Turbo - ignore everything else for now, and just concentrate on the 3 account statements ONLY. I have taken these as true statements of account - therefore all dates, amounts and balances are taken as factual.
Start with Loan 1.
8 payments WERE made, and WERE included in the balance owing on 01/02/07.
The loan was partially settled on 16/02/07, leaving a balance owing of £8.57.
The account was credited with £151.89 "Settlement Adj." on 19/02/07, leaving a credit balance of £143.32.
The account was finally debited with £143.32 "Refund" on 27/02/07, leaving a zero balance.
PPI was therefore charged on all 8 payments
If this final refund was actually made to D1anne separately, then we need to confirm that, and deduct £143.32 x 13.9204% = £19.95 from the £119.72 claim I put forward earlier, making the claim £99.77.
Now, the PPI 'Carry-Forward' (or 'Flowthrough' as BH have mentioned) :-
There was actually a ninth payment made on 16/02/07 toward this loan, in the form of a credit of £1879.39.
Previously, we may have claimed £261.62 as the 13.9204% PPI element of this as a part of the claim for Loan 1, but not under current FSA rules.
This £1879.39 forms a part of the total advance for Loan 2, which itself had £1142.99 PPI charged to it.
So, the total of the PPI element in Loan 2 was actually £1142.99 + £261.62 = £1404.61, which is 22.8652% of the total loan advance.
We repeat this for Loans 2 & 3.
The 'Carry-Forward' has the effect of increasing the apportionment factor in the subsequent loan(s), and the 'brought-forward' PPI is reclaimed in this way. It has the effect of increasing the claim quantum, so it is to the claimant's advantage.
Originally posted by Turbo
The debt was settled with a repayment of £10619.56. As 29.141% of this was PPI, then £3094.65 is due to be refunded from this.
I believe this is where BH have made their error, in that they 'Carried-Forward' the £3094.65 PPI to nowhere !!!
For simplicity, we could perhaps accept their figures for loans 1 & 2, and simply dispute loan 3's offer, as this is where the main error is, IMO. But that's up to D1anne to decide.






Leave a comment: