Good Afternoon All
I have received a PCN from Highview Parking, Watford Waterfields. Link to PCN Image
I have read previous posts and am hopeful that I might be successful in appealing I saw a previous post and formulated the following initial response below.
Link to PCN Image Back page
Initial reply to PCN by me ..
Re PCN number: 20000x Registration XXX
I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner. There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegation and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle. If the allegation concerns a PDT machine, the data supplied in response to this appeal must include the record of payments made - showing partial VRNs - and an explanation of the reason for the PCN, because your Notice does not explain it.
If the allegation involves an alleged overstay of minutes, your evidence must include the actual grace period agreed by the landowner.
As your Parking Charge Notice does not comply with the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4), you are, in law, unable to hold the registered keeper of the vehicle liable for the parking charge; I suggest therefore that you contact the driver. As there is no legal requirement placed on the registered keeper to identify the driver, I will not be doing so.
Furthermore it is understood the car park was fully populated that day with over 25 minute waiting time for a space that allowed suitable provision to open both doors to allow 1 small child and a baby out was not possible. The vehicle would not have been parked for the 2 hours that this charge is indicating.
Thanks in advance.
AppealPCN.co.uk Response
Dear Madam,
Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking Charge.
The representations stated in your correspondence have been noted and considered.
Please forward to us the full name and address of the driver at the time this charge was incurred so that we can update our records accordingly.
Also, in light of your claims, we are prepared to reconsider the status of this Charge should we receive evidence of your custom at the site on the date in question.
However, until such time as this evidence is received this Charge will continue to remain outstanding.
We are placing this Charge on hold for 14 days from the date of this letter to allow time for the documentation requested to be received.
Yours faithfully,
Highview Parking Ltd.
Please help as I am not sure how to respond and I only have 14 days as of today!
Many Thanks
I have received a PCN from Highview Parking, Watford Waterfields. Link to PCN Image
I have read previous posts and am hopeful that I might be successful in appealing I saw a previous post and formulated the following initial response below.
Link to PCN Image Back page
Initial reply to PCN by me ..
Re PCN number: 20000x Registration XXX
I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner. There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegation and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle. If the allegation concerns a PDT machine, the data supplied in response to this appeal must include the record of payments made - showing partial VRNs - and an explanation of the reason for the PCN, because your Notice does not explain it.
If the allegation involves an alleged overstay of minutes, your evidence must include the actual grace period agreed by the landowner.
As your Parking Charge Notice does not comply with the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4), you are, in law, unable to hold the registered keeper of the vehicle liable for the parking charge; I suggest therefore that you contact the driver. As there is no legal requirement placed on the registered keeper to identify the driver, I will not be doing so.
Furthermore it is understood the car park was fully populated that day with over 25 minute waiting time for a space that allowed suitable provision to open both doors to allow 1 small child and a baby out was not possible. The vehicle would not have been parked for the 2 hours that this charge is indicating.
Thanks in advance.
AppealPCN.co.uk Response
Dear Madam,
Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking Charge.
The representations stated in your correspondence have been noted and considered.
Please forward to us the full name and address of the driver at the time this charge was incurred so that we can update our records accordingly.
Also, in light of your claims, we are prepared to reconsider the status of this Charge should we receive evidence of your custom at the site on the date in question.
However, until such time as this evidence is received this Charge will continue to remain outstanding.
We are placing this Charge on hold for 14 days from the date of this letter to allow time for the documentation requested to be received.
Yours faithfully,
Highview Parking Ltd.
Please help as I am not sure how to respond and I only have 14 days as of today!
Many Thanks