CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

The Directors name is Mark Melville, dob 16/10/1955 he is also a director of the following

County Court Collections Ltd - Active

Agreements.Co.Uk. Ltd - Financial Statements too old

Agreements Ltd - Active

Rio International Ltd - Company dissolved

IT Appointments Ltd - Company dissolved

The Business Grants Consultancy Ltd - Company dissolved

Firstdirect.com Ltd - Company dissolved

Windows Warehouse (Retail) Ltd - Active, newly incorporated

Easy CMS Ltd - Company dissolved

Markyboy Ltd - Company dissolved


If anyone wants anymore info give me a shout please.

Oh what a busy boy then lol.

[Angry Cat]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Nice easy case for them though:
http://www.e-sue.co.uk/#

http://www.e-sue.co.uk/docs/Lowell_Claim.pdf

Obviously, the judgement is beneficial. However, am concerned that some may mis-intpret the reasoning behind same.
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Good result, on this occasion.
But, is this not just another claims firm advertising their services OTR?
http://www.agreements.co.uk/customer_service.htm
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Name & Registered Office:
AGREEMENTS.CO.UK LIMITED
MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS HOUSE
143-144 FLEET STREET
LONDON
UNITED KINGDOM
EC4A 2BP
Company No. 04511033


Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 14/08/2002

Country of Origin: United Kingdom
Company Type: Private Limited Company
Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
7260 - Other computer related activities
7411 - Legal activities
Accounting Reference Date: 31/08
Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/08/2008 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)
Next Accounts Due: 31/05/2010 OVERDUE
Last Return Made Up To: 14/08/2009
Next Return Due: 11/09/2010
Last Members List: 14/08/2009
Previous Names:Date of changePrevious Name17/03/2003GLOBEXPHARMA LIMITED

[TomThumb]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Not blinkers.
rathermore like directions?

Anyone, seen this:

http://www.e-sue.co.uk/docs/lowell_judgment.pdf

posted up OTR by a first time poster...needs checking out!

Its nice everyonce in a while to see justice prevail

S.

[pompeyfaith]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Would love to see a case like this go to appeal court :tinysmile_grin_t:

[Tools]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Interesting and a common sense Judgment in my opinion, thanks AC

[pompeyfaith]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Nice and how it should be, over the last two years since having to give up work though disability at my last count I had a total of 147 threat letters from various DCA's

Also many from my bank when there is a clear "VIS" a "VIS" regarding missold PPI.

Nice Judgement just goes to show what can be achieved on a subject that many would say is hard to prove.

PF

[Angry Cat]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

And she's still got her blinkers on. Although it doesn't apparently stop her from seeing a very big chip on my shoulder, I notice.

Not blinkers.
rathermore like directions?

Anyone, seen this:

http://www.e-sue.co.uk/docs/lowell_judgment.pdf

posted up OTR by a first time poster...needs checking out!

[LuggerBugs]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

And she's still got her blinkers on. Although it doesn't apparently stop her from seeing a very big chip on my shoulder, I notice.

[Angry Cat]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

I can't believe I haven't been CAGbotted for my comments. Heck, I'm surprised I haven't been banned yet.

Of course, if that happens, there are other avenues open to get my point across.

I note that Lowell CRT are still posting OTR and;
Comrade Booky is still spouting. However, she now appears to have completely forgotten her quote: 15 minutes!


http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...-Viewing)-nbsp

Post number 17

[LuggerBugs]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

I can't believe I haven't been CAGbotted for my comments. Heck, I'm surprised I haven't been banned yet.

Of course, if that happens, there are other avenues open to get my point across.

[Angry Cat]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Sorry to drag this up again. But after reading earlier about Bookie's absolute refusal to accept that Lowell's were being allowed to post, and indeed tried to tell everyone that they were shot down in flames and lasted about 15 minutes, I notice this wee contribution...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ncial-old-debt



Checking the user's profile shows a total of 8 posts. And "James" has been a member since 21st June.

Hardly a "15 minutes of fame".

Perhaps Bookie needs to go to Specsavers? Seems there is a discrepency between the threads SHE sees and what everybody sees. She apparently can't even see the ads, FFS.

Up to last night, their last activity was, 12 August 2010.

[righty]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Who's Buzby are they a former Mod?
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
If they can ID you they CAN use thread you created in litigation. They may even use it to 'prove' what good guys they are & how they tried to help but you, the feckless debtor, couldn't be persuaded to pay up

Have they given an undertaking NOT to use in any litigation what they learn from CAG ......... I bet not

[EXC]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

Looks like CAG's consultation response will make for some interesting reading. Can't wait.


Martin3030
''Think the bailiff fees are under remit of the MOJ arent they ?''

Kennythecelt
''Yes you are correct Martin.''

Urgent-views wanted,Consumer Rights Directive -Unfairness in Consumer Contracts

[LuggerBugs]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

legally they are bound by data protection legislation from discussing your issue on a public forum

It's a pity CAG don't seem to worry about DPA issues, and seem quite happy to hang the Cabot 6 out to dry.

Oh, sorry... the Cabot 6 voluntarily revealed their personal details to Cabot's solicitors. Nothing whatsoever to do with Marc Gander and his Stormtroopers bullying and browbeating them into doing so. No way, no siree.

[leclerc]

Re: CAG has had an almighty 'upgrade'

That does mean that they are officially recognised. I know that MSE allow company representatives but ONLY authorised by them and they are clearly visible. That appears to be the CAG policy if that Customer Rep is authorised but have their terms and conditions changed though?
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
"4.4 Please note that usernames highlighted in GREEN are customer service representatives who have asked permission from site administration to monitor, and respond to, posts made. Please use your discretion when responding to these users. We have agreed to allow them to post as a means to helping users resolve issues more quickly, however they are not authorised to hassle users, and legally they are bound by data protection legislation from discussing your issue on a public forum - unless you give them permission to do so. If you feel that an authorised customer service representative is acting unlawfully, or is breaching the terms of their membership, please contact site administration."

I have removed their email addy but yes their rules have changed again on 12/08/2010
Forum rules. Please read these before posting