• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Two-year wait for Financial Ombudsman verdicts

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Two-year wait for Financial Ombudsman verdicts

    Two-year wait for Financial Ombudsman verdicts.


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/p...-verdicts.html


    People who take complaints against banks and insurers to the Financial Ombudsman Service are having to wait as long as two years for a decision, it has emerged.


    By Jessica Gorst-Williams 12:30PM BST 30 Mar 2011



    Several readers have expressed disquiet about the time it is taking to navigate some complaints through the FOS. A few report waits of more than two years.

    I have expressed concern about this to FOS, which tells me that it is currently receiving a record number of cases. It expects the number to amount to more than 170,000 by the end of this financial year.


    Many relate to payment protection insurance (PPI) where the British Bankers’ Association’s legal challenge on behalf of the industry to the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the regulator, and the FOS is ongoing.


    Of the rest, the FOS said it was resolving 51pc within three months and 75pc within six. It added that the number of cases being referred beyond the adjudicator stage to an ombudsman for a final decision had doubled from 10pc to 20pc in some areas. This extends the time it takes to conclude a matter.

    The delayed cases I am referring to are not about PPI.

    The service said some insurance companies were also digging in their heels, even on claims involving relatively small amounts. This brings it yet more work. It said the chief ombudsman recognised that some cases were taking too long and had made it a priority to ensure the service had the resources to deal with this.
    The FOS said consumers should let it know if there was a genuine reason for a case to be fast-tracked – for example, if they were suffering from serious ill health or were in severe financial difficulty.
    Tags: None

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X