Tweet
Hi Guys, I am about to file a defence against parking control management (PCM) who are using Gladstone solicitors and have issued a claim against me for a parking contravention for July 2020. My defence is that the residential block I was living in at the time had a number of allocated bays for parking. Some residents owned there own bays and the ones like myself who did not, had to share several bays. So for example I was allowed to park in bay 7,9,16,27,15 -21. However in 2020, several of the shared parking bays had construction containers put on them for cladding works in the block to be carried out. This restricted our parking severely for the small number of bays we had. I would like to argue with photographic evidence that as the parking bays were obstructed by the construction company who were instructed by the housing association who in turn instructed PCM, the contract is/was invalid etc.
Does this argument hold up? and if so can anyone point me to any points of law etc, that i can use in my defence?
(A request for inspection of documents under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Gladstone Solicitors Ltd was sent and not answered)
Does this argument hold up? and if so can anyone point me to any points of law etc, that i can use in my defence?
(A request for inspection of documents under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Gladstone Solicitors Ltd was sent and not answered)
