** DiScOnTinUeD ** BC/Lowell V Kelike28 ** WON **

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

[QUOTE=Amethyst;480292]They should do.... whether they do or not is

Me again. Do I send 2 copies to the court or 1 to court and 1 to BC? Assuming I send recorded? Thanks

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

1 to court and 1 to BC xx Recorded is best yes.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Just in case I'm being dumb lol. It's my local court now isn't it. Not Northampton.

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Yes - the order for hearing/disclosure came from your local court didn't it?

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Yes it did. Feel silly asking it but feeling edgy about it now so wanted to be sure.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Yes - the order for hearing/disclosure came from your local court didn't it?

Just having a little panic. After all this.... is it possible the judge can just give be me a CCJ there and then? I'm kind of feeling sick! :tinysmile_cry_t:

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Don't panic, and really don't worry. Yes they could get a CCJ at the hearing, you do have the option of paying within 28 days if they do and you want to keep it off your credit file, otherwise you'll ask for an instalment order to pay an affordable amount each month - but that's really not going to happen unless they turn up on the day with compliant documents.

If they get compliant documents to you beforehand then you can negotiate with them for an installment Tomlin order to keep you out of having a CCJ and pay an affordable amount each month.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Don't panic, and really don't worry. Yes they could get a CCJ at the hearing, you do have the option of paying within 28 days if they do and you want to keep it off your credit file, otherwise you'll ask for an instalment order to pay an affordable amount each month - but that's really not going to happen unless they turn up on the day with compliant documents.

If they get compliant documents to you beforehand then you can negotiate with them for an installment Tomlin order to keep you out of having a CCJ and pay an affordable amount each month.

Oooh ek! So if their WS which I should get any day has all the said docs I can try and save going to court. If they don't send me anything are they allowed to produce them on the day in court? If so can I deem it as unfair as they haven't given me fair chance to defend or accept it etc

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Don't panic, and really don't worry. Yes they could get a CCJ at the hearing, you do have the option of paying within 28 days if they do and you want to keep it off your credit file, otherwise you'll ask for an instalment order to pay an affordable amount each month - but that's really not going to happen unless they turn up on the day with compliant documents.

If they get compliant documents to you beforehand then you can negotiate with them for an installment Tomlin order to keep you out of having a CCJ and pay an affordable amount each month.

Post man came yesterday and nothing from BC also been this morning and nothing from BC. Surely I should have their WS by now? Does anything change if the courts don't get BCs WS in time?

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Post man came yesterday and nothing from BC also been this morning and nothing from BC. Surely I should have their WS by now? Does anything change if the courts don't get BCs WS in time?

11 days and still nothing from BC. Should I not call the court and explain I've not had anything from BC? Or not?

[MIKE770]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

they are at default as usual, seems to be their game of chance, Ame seems to be helping you here so wait until she advises any movement, look back in here, without going all through your thread I guess that They have not complied with CCA request etc etc?????

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

they are at default as usual, seems to be their game of chance, Ame seems to be helping you here so wait until she advises any movement, look back in here, without going all through your thread I guess that They have not complied with CCA request etc etc?????

No. Not complied with anything. Bit unfair really if they can be allowed to go to hearing without abiding by rules. They had my WS Thursday last week so I at least thought they may send me theirs a few days later.

[MIKE770]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

read other threads lowell Brian carter you will get the picture of the letters/non compliance they send i/e/ we want to agree a consent order or the OC would of given you the term etc at inception (not producing themselves) , the next move is up to them, you have sent you say your WS, so it is up to them now, not sure PM Ame if you like>

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

read other threads lowell Brian carter you will get the picture of the letters/non compliance they send i/e/ we want to agree a consent order or the OC would of given you the term etc at inception (not producing themselves) , the next move is up to them, you have sent you say your WS, so it is up to them now, not sure PM Ame if you like>

Post man been and gone again. Still nothing. Shall PM Amethyst. See what she thinks. Thanks

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

No need Just having a read back xx