** DiScOnTinUeD ** BC/Lowell V Kelike28 ** WON **

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Nothing to worry about for you, its a very simple 2 page with no questions that will cause you any trouble basically asking if you are willing to seek mediation and that you agree to the allocated track the case will be assigned to

onlyme

Thanks onlyme. Hopefully that will come soon so I can stop fretting and hopefully get something sorted.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

lol, dickheads, well keep the emails, shows you acted properly and they didn't, and wait for the court to come back to you, next step should be the allocation/directions questionnaire.

Hi

I've just had another letter through the post, it is headed without prejudice, then says the court have notified them of my defence butt hey are hoping we can agree this matter without the need for a court hearing, if they do not hear from me they will apply to the court to strike out my defence at hearing which will result in further costs for me. They have also included a consent order for me to fill in. Obviously i wont. Is this another standard letter?????
Thanks v muchly folks

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Yes, another standard letter I'm afraid. File it with the rest. If it isn't a proper offer then the without prejudice bit has no relevance.

What's the consent order say?


Actually bit weird as their other letter said they wished to continue which they wouldnt send unless they knew you'd defended.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

O

Yes, another standard letter I'm afraid. File it with the rest. If it isn't a proper offer then the without prejudice bit has no relevance.

What's the consent order say?


Actually bit weird as their other letter said they wished to continue which they wouldnt send unless they knew you'd defended.

It does actually offer me an option to pay the full amount on the claim by instalments by me inserting an amount on the form to which I think I can afford.
The order had gaps to be filled in...
Before District judge on the day of sitting at CCBC
Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement
By consent
It is ordered that all further proceedings in this action be stayed upon the terms set out in the schedule below blah blah blah
And it is further ordered that there be no order as to costs
Schedule
1 the claimant agrees to accept full sum and pay by instalments
2 the claimant agrees not to enter judgement if above is maintained
3 will be at liberty to enter judgement if balance remains unpaid

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Amethyst could you take a look at my reply please? Thanks a mil

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Itsonlyme had same, two tics I'll get link for you... have they produced documents under either the CPR or cca requests? If no then I'd remind them of such.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Itsonlyme had same, two tics I'll get link for you... have they produced documents under either the CPR or cca requests? If no then I'd remind them of such.

Nope...big fat nothing in regard to documents requested from either Lowell or BC

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...fence-lowel-BC

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Sooooooo I take it i just to wait for the Court to send questionnaire... perhaps reply again reminding him im waiting for response to my requests? Or leave out BC for now?

[Amethyst]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

I'd just wait for the questionnaire, thought I guess it won't hurt to reply saying thanks I'll consider it once you've sent all the documents

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

BC have been quite good (haha) in replying to my emails of late so I just dropped them a line to say thanks but no Thanks. Until documents received I shall just wait to heart from the court. Maybe they will respond maybe not. Thanks again. Especially for getting back to me at the weekend xx

[ohitsonlyme]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Kelike look at the dates between the letters. They replied on the same day that they received my last letter.


I am not going to reply soo quickly to them or it may become ping pong letters

This will give them the idea that I would settle rather than go to court

I don't wish to hand over the initiative to them, so my reply to the tomlin letter will not go off for a week or so, with another paragraph stating "having duly considered"

Onlymeagain

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Kelike look at the dates between the letters. They replied on the same day that they received my last letter



I am not going to reply soo quickly to them or it may become ping pong letters

This will give them the idea that I would settle rather than go to court

I don't wish to hand over the initiative to them, so my reply to the tomlin letter will not go off for a week or so, with another paragraph stating "having duly considered"

Onlymeagain

Yes that makes total sense. Well like I said i emailed yesterday... just see what happens next. Fingers crossed it won't take forever.

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Kelike look at the dates between the letters. They replied on the same day that they received my last letter.


I am not going to reply soo quickly to them or it may become ping pong letters

This will give them the idea that I would settle rather than go to court

I don't wish to hand over the initiative to them, so my reply to the tomlin letter will not go off for a week or so, with another paragraph stating "having duly considered"

Onlymeagain

Hi Ive just had an email again from BC as below......please let me know what you think and if i just still hang on to hear from the courts. I am happy to do so but dont want to appear to be missing anything i should be doing along the way.

Cheers all. xx

Thank you for your email, the contents of which we have noted.It is the original creditor’s policy to provide an agreement to its customers at the point of contract and statements throughout and therefore you have already been provided with validation of the debt. Our client will therefore provide a validation of the debt in accordance with the court’s directions.We recommend that you seek independent legal advice

[kelike28]

Re: BC/Lowell V Kelike28

Kelike look at the dates between the letters. They replied on the same day that they received my last letter.


I am not going to reply soo quickly to them or it may become ping pong letters

This will give them the idea that I would settle rather than go to court

I don't wish to hand over the initiative to them, so my reply to the tomlin letter will not go off for a week or so, with another paragraph stating "having duly considered"

Onlymeagain

Hi Ive just had an email again from BC as below......please let me know what you think and if i just still hang on to hear from the courts. I am happy to do so but dont want to appear to be missing anything i should be doing along the way.

Cheers all. xx

Thank you for your email, the contents of which we have noted.It is the original creditor’s policy to provide an agreement to its customers at the point of contract and statements throughout and therefore you have already been provided with validation of the debt. Our client will therefore provide a validation of the debt in accordance with the court’s directions.We recommend that you seek independent legal advice