Proof of identity

[Kati]

Re: Proof of identity

I am very pleased to say, that the claim against me was struck out on Friday the 26th.
Thank you again for all your help 

Is there any chance you still have documents/letters showing this (from February)??
[MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] ... would it be a good idea to incorporate the previous strike-out in this 'new' defence??

[Amethyst]

Re: Proof of identity

And is this still the only copy agreement you have received? http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...007#post644007 Still no accompanying terms?

( not that it matters that much but just checking how much come back they would have to a strike out app )

You have NOA and DN.

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

Same solicitors , yes.
Do I still need to do the usual process , acknowledge the claim intending to defend ?

Yes, otherwise they will get judgement by default.

nem

[icrina53]

Re: Proof of identity

So presumably they didn't argue the strike out previously then? so no relief from sanctions.

Same solicitors ?

You will need to apply to strike on the grounds they have already had a claim on the same cause of action struck out, and as such this claim is an abuse of process, but it is worth writing to them first with a copy of the strike out notice.

Same solicitors , yes.
Do I still need to do the usual process , acknowledge the claim intending to defend ?

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

Of course you can :nod: xx

Thank You!!
nemxx

[Kati]

Re: Proof of identity

I might have to email it to Kati if she doesn't mind as I cannot do it on my phone .

Of course you can :nod: xx

EDIT: Got it xx

[Amethyst]

Re: Proof of identity

So presumably they didn't argue the strike out previously then? so no relief from sanctions.

Same solicitors ?

You will need to apply to strike on the grounds they have already had a claim on the same cause of action struck out, and as such this claim is an abuse of process, but it is worth writing to them first with a copy of the strike out notice.

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

I might have to email it to Kati if she doesn't mind as I cannot do it on my phone .

OK Icrina I'll tag [MENTION=49370]Kati[/MENTION] can you help please?

nemxx

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

tagging @nemesis45 xx

Thanks [MENTION=49370]Kati[/MENTION] xx

[icrina53]

Re: Proof of identity

Hello Icarina.

Please tell us what they are up to now.

Can you please post a copy of the claim form after removing your name and address and the claim number.

nem

I might have to email it to Kati if she doesn't mind as I cannot do it on my phone .

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

I can't believe it! they re-issued court proceedings again, received the court papers through the post today.

Hello Icarina.

Please tell us what they are up to now.

Can you please post a copy of the claim form after removing your name and address and the claim number.

nem

[Kati]

Re: Proof of identity

tagging [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] xx

[icrina53]

Re: Proof of identity

I can't believe it! they re-issued court proceedings again, received the court papers through the post today.

[nemesis45]

Re: Proof of identity

Thank you for that ! yes I saw that on their website , i will have a better look tomorrow on a computer.
What application form should I enclose? i'm a bit confused .
I will type up the letter tomorrow and send it .

The one you have received and posted here they say is the agreement.
nem

[icrina53]

Re: Proof of identity

Ok.

Private & Confidential

Mr Simon A Baskind
Director Cohen Cramer Solicitors
Address as on their letters.

Date:

Ref: use the one on their letter.
Re: CC Claim Struck Out On Date:

Dear Mr Baskind,


I refer you to a letter from Cohen Cramer dated ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, in regard to the CC claim No. C5GK9061 struck out by DDJ Murray- Smith on 23rd February 2016 I am rather surprised that Cohen Cramer is not aware of the reasons for the DD Judges decision.

However Cohen Cramer has now on behalf of it's client certain documents that it claims may lead to judgment in favour of its client if put before a court. I am however not convinced by this argument nor do I believe that the documents provided meet the requirements of a true copy of an agreement or a reconstituted true copy and the document is therefore rejected for reasons that I am sure you are aware.

I have attached herewith a copy of the application form supplied for ease of reference.

Should your client decide either to challenge the strike out or reissue proceedings any such action will be robustly defended.
Your early confirmation that this matter is now closed would be appreciated.

Encl: Attach a copy of the application form.

Signed for post Icrina check delivery date and signature and print off a copy.


I notice from researching Howard Cohen/ Cohen Cramer that the SRA has had some " interest " in their " practices"!

nem

Thank you for that ! yes I saw that on their website , i will have a better look tomorrow on a computer.
What application form should I enclose? i'm a bit confused .
I will type up the letter tomorrow and send it .