• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Garlok
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    There ain't many countries who would welcome the likes of Barclays taking up domicile in their territory particularly now it has been established that they and their like are "too big to fail" and it is the taxpayer of the country of domicile that in the end picks up the tab.

    Many sensible commentators including a specialist Reuters investigation and report have openly discussed this. If Diamond wants to go then let him, his own country doesn't want him. Just remember it was him that boasted to a Parliamentary Select Committee that Barclays had paid 2 billion into the Treasury via taxation on "his Bank". When examined that does not stand up to scrutiny, in fact most of that was made up of payroll taxes from his employees and only 113million please note million was corporation tax on the business. The rest of the tax had been evaded by offshore machinations.

    Let 'em go and we can get back to manufacturing things in this country. The Japanese disasters have revealed just how vulnerable we are relying on the likes of Diamond and his grubby little mates.

    regards
    Garlok

    Leave a comment:


  • NLP
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by EXC View Post
    If NLP genuinely believes that, somehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case, he needs help.

    If he thinks that a complex £4b case involving 4 parties which took just six months from the initial claim to judgment wasn't expedited or took any longer than if he took his own PPI claim to the County Court, he is deluded.

    That's not a criticism. It's a psychological condition.
    Enjoying the weather, young man?
    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
    Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    That is the point they will not be paying out billions in the sence of the word but returning money that was never theres in the first place.

    They will only return the money if it is proved that the policy was missold and on that basis the money is not, was not and never will be theres.

    If the Supreme Court does judge in the BBA's favour it will be another nail in the coffin of the british financial industry and will prove how corrupt justice is.

    However I still stand behind Judge Ouseley's excellent Judgement and still believe it will win the day and July will be the turning point for us all.


    [/color][/left]
    I clearly hope you are correct, as we all do no doubt.... but I certainly would not bet on it.
    Last edited by NLP; 28th April 2011, 16:21:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul210
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by EXC View Post
    somehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case
    The government cant control judges and frequently loose on big matters where they are a direct party rather than simply have a percieved vested interest (recent attempts at deportation and the human rights act and voting rights for prisoners spring to mind) even if they wanted to I dont think they could control the outcome (thankfully)

    Leave a comment:


  • EXC
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    If NLP genuinely believes that, somehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case, he needs help.

    If he thinks that a complex £4b case involving 4 parties which took just six months from the initial claim to judgment wasn't expedited or took any longer than if he took his own PPI claim to the County Court, he is deluded.

    That's not a criticism. It's a psychological condition.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    returning money that was never theres in the first place.
    They won't see it that way. That's the point. There's probably not much point debating this.

    I could really do with my money back from First Direct right now, but do I think I'm likely to get it back? I honstly don't know. Probably not.

    Leave a comment:


  • pompeyfaith
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    You must remember this... the banks keep this little old island afloat... no government can afford to not bow down to them.


    I do not agree it is business that keeps us aflot banks are merely custonians of the money generated by business if there was no businesses paying that money in they would soon go under the whole country is running scared of the banks and that is wrong if a bank goes bust or want to move let them as another will soon take over the gap they left.

    The Government and us consumers are the true kingmakers, we should never be held to ransom by the banks.




    Last edited by pompeyfaith; 28th April 2011, 15:25:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • pompeyfaith
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    do not like paying out billions to consumers


    That is the point they will not be paying out billions in the sence of the word but returning money that was never theres in the first place.

    They will only return the money if it is proved that the policy was missold and on that basis the money is not, was not and never will be theres.

    If the Supreme Court does judge in the BBA's favour it will be another nail in the coffin of the british financial industry and will prove how corrupt justice is.

    However I still stand behind Judge Ouseley's excellent Judgement and still believe it will win the day and July will be the turning point for us all.


    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by NLP View Post
    relocation of Barclay's to NYC... the City pooped themselves... they win at all costs cos they can.
    Sadly that statement must be accurate. The bank bail outs were a fop to their threats.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul210
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Not sure where they got their figures from but if correct a ppi ROE of 490% is scary, im clearly in the wrong game, how do i get into this selling ppi lark??

    (said in jest, before the entire LB community come gunning for me lol.)

    Leave a comment:


  • NLP
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by The Debt Star View Post
    That'd be my take on it as well.

    The 'system' always wins one way or 'tother.
    CORRECT!
    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
    Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    NLP,

    6 Words with no sustinance perhaps you could enlighten us all and give your reasons why you think it will be lost at the supreme court.

    come on we are dying to know.
    Just my opinion... based upon previous stich ups.

    You must remember this... the banks keep this little old island afloat... no government can afford to not bow down to them.

    Look at Bob Diamond recent comments re:re location for Barclay's to NYC... the City pooped themselves... they win at all costs cos they can.
    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
    Those still in lah lah land not able to comprehend who the banks truly are

    spend a few hours watching "Money Masters" on you tube or reading The Creature from Jekyll Island.
    Last edited by NLP; 28th April 2011, 15:00:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Good question. Lets say if I HAD to place a bet then I would bet on the banks winning; and not for any other reason than this affects the bank balances of the most powerful people in the land.

    Leave a comment:


  • skv123
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Would you put any against it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    PF, the problem is that the monied elite, who own the banks one way or the other, do not like paying out billions to consumers. To appear "just" the case has to be seen to succeed at one level, but on appeal may go 'tother way.

    This is cynical and I do not want it to be that way. I have PPI claims and detest the banks with a passion.

    I just wouldn't put any ready money on a consumer victory in the long-term.

    Leave a comment:


  • pompeyfaith
    replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    NLP,

    6 Words with no sustinance perhaps you could enlighten us all and give your reasons why you think it will be lost at the supreme court.

    come on we are dying to know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

    Originally posted by NLP View Post
    Appeal.... lose

    Supreme... win

    the end.

    That'd be my take on it as well.

    The 'system' always wins one way or 'tother.

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X