Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
There ain't many countries who would welcome the likes of Barclays taking up domicile in their territory particularly now it has been established that they and their like are "too big to fail" and it is the taxpayer of the country of domicile that in the end picks up the tab.
Many sensible commentators including a specialist Reuters investigation and report have openly discussed this. If Diamond wants to go then let him, his own country doesn't want him. Just remember it was him that boasted to a Parliamentary Select Committee that Barclays had paid 2 billion into the Treasury via taxation on "his Bank". When examined that does not stand up to scrutiny, in fact most of that was made up of payroll taxes from his employees and only 113million please note million was corporation tax on the business. The rest of the tax had been evaded by offshore machinations.
Let 'em go and we can get back to manufacturing things in this country. The Japanese disasters have revealed just how vulnerable we are relying on the likes of Diamond and his grubby little mates.
regards
Garlok
Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Enjoying the weather, young man?Originally posted by EXC View PostIf NLP genuinely believes that, somehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case, he needs help.
If he thinks that a complex £4b case involving 4 parties which took just six months from the initial claim to judgment wasn't expedited or took any longer than if he took his own PPI claim to the County Court, he is deluded.
That's not a criticism. It's a psychological condition.
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
I clearly hope you are correct, as we all do no doubt.... but I certainly would not bet on it.Originally posted by pompeyfaith View PostThat is the point they will not be paying out billions in the sence of the word but returning money that was never theres in the first place.
They will only return the money if it is proved that the policy was missold and on that basis the money is not, was not and never will be theres.
If the Supreme Court does judge in the BBA's favour it will be another nail in the coffin of the british financial industry and will prove how corrupt justice is.
However I still stand behind Judge Ouseley's excellent Judgement and still believe it will win the day and July will be the turning point for us all.
[/color][/left]
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
The government cant control judges and frequently loose on big matters where they are a direct party rather than simply have a percieved vested interest (recent attempts at deportation and the human rights act and voting rights for prisoners spring to mind) even if they wanted to I dont think they could control the outcome (thankfully)Originally posted by EXC View Postsomehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
If NLP genuinely believes that, somehow, the Government would risk their very existence to attempt to corrupt 5 of the most senior judges in the UK and risk their own distinguished careers to throw a case, he needs help.
If he thinks that a complex £4b case involving 4 parties which took just six months from the initial claim to judgment wasn't expedited or took any longer than if he took his own PPI claim to the County Court, he is deluded.
That's not a criticism. It's a psychological condition.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
They won't see it that way. That's the point. There's probably not much point debating this.Originally posted by pompeyfaith View Postreturning money that was never theres in the first place.
I could really do with my money back from First Direct right now, but do I think I'm likely to get it back? I honstly don't know. Probably not.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
You must remember this... the banks keep this little old island afloat... no government can afford to not bow down to them.
I do not agree it is business that keeps us aflot banks are merely custonians of the money generated by business if there was no businesses paying that money in they would soon go under the whole country is running scared of the banks and that is wrong if a bank goes bust or want to move let them as another will soon take over the gap they left.
The Government and us consumers are the true kingmakers, we should never be held to ransom by the banks.
Last edited by pompeyfaith; 28th April 2011, 15:25:PM.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
do not like paying out billions to consumers
That is the point they will not be paying out billions in the sence of the word but returning money that was never theres in the first place.
They will only return the money if it is proved that the policy was missold and on that basis the money is not, was not and never will be theres.
If the Supreme Court does judge in the BBA's favour it will be another nail in the coffin of the british financial industry and will prove how corrupt justice is.
However I still stand behind Judge Ouseley's excellent Judgement and still believe it will win the day and July will be the turning point for us all.
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Sadly that statement must be accurate. The bank bail outs were a fop to their threats.Originally posted by NLP View Postrelocation of Barclay's to NYC... the City pooped themselves... they win at all costs cos they can.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Not sure where they got their figures from but if correct a ppi ROE of 490% is scary, im clearly in the wrong game, how do i get into this selling ppi lark??Originally posted by di30 View Post
(said in jest, before the entire LB community come gunning for me lol.)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
CORRECT!Originally posted by The Debt Star View PostThat'd be my take on it as well.
The 'system' always wins one way or 'tother.
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Just my opinion... based upon previous stich ups.Originally posted by pompeyfaith View PostNLP,
6 Words with no sustinance perhaps you could enlighten us all and give your reasons why you think it will be lost at the supreme court.
come on we are dying to know.
You must remember this... the banks keep this little old island afloat... no government can afford to not bow down to them.
Look at Bob Diamond recent comments re:re location for Barclay's to NYC... the City pooped themselves... they win at all costs cos they can.
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Those still in lah lah land not able to comprehend who the banks truly are
spend a few hours watching "Money Masters" on you tube or reading The Creature from Jekyll Island.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Good question. Lets say if I HAD to place a bet then I would bet on the banks winning; and not for any other reason than this affects the bank balances of the most powerful people in the land.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Would you put any against it?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
PF, the problem is that the monied elite, who own the banks one way or the other, do not like paying out billions to consumers. To appear "just" the case has to be seen to succeed at one level, but on appeal may go 'tother way.
This is cynical and I do not want it to be that way. I have PPI claims and detest the banks with a passion.
I just wouldn't put any ready money on a consumer victory in the long-term.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
NLP,
6 Words with no sustinance perhaps you could enlighten us all and give your reasons why you think it will be lost at the supreme court.
come on we are dying to know.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Originally posted by NLP View PostAppeal.... lose
Supreme... win
the end.
That'd be my take on it as well.
The 'system' always wins one way or 'tother.
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: