• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

PPI and Court

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: PPI and Court

    In my view, the offer sent to you is in line with our usual guidance as explained in my letter dated 20 September 2010 and also fair and reasonable.

    Read more at: PPI and Court - Page 12 - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum
    ''In my view''--I don't pf is interested in his view.

    ''fair and reasonable'--is a million miles from ''correct and exact''

    reasonable [ˈriːzənəbəl]adj1. showing reason or sound judgment
    2. having the ability to reason
    3. having modest or moderate expectations; not making unfair demands
    4. (Business / Commerce) moderate in price; not expensive
    5. fair; average reasonable weather

    Comment


    • Re: PPI and Court

      Right Pf

      Slow down--keep calm
      Everyone else -- no more tunes/photos or simple messages of supporrt

      We are at the sharp end now and need to focus on info in a few posts

      The Fos have commented today that
      1-they do not deal with DSAR
      2-they think the offer was reasonable
      3-they want PF to tell them the timeframe you want to extend their particular "deadline"

      I presume that you have not contacted Co-Op successfully ??

      Two issues then:

      FOS

      Reply to them with illustration on why they are wrong in saying that they believe that Co-Op have followed the guidelines (refer to the old letter which they say it is not up to them to understand the sums !!!

      Then as an illustration-we'll concentrate on JUST LOAN 1 which is easy to explain the difficiency in their offer in simple English Prose without the aid of spreadsheets.!!

      Then-we ask them to explain why they think its right
      and tell them the timeframe required to accept/ the offer be extended to14 days after full compliance with the DSAR (which is only asking for simple statements)

      Co-OP

      Keep up a civil relationship & conversation with Co-Op via phone-frequent fax & reminders that the timeframe is effectively 40 days


      Later tonight--I will draft your reply to FOS for tomorrow, hopefully Bill & Marshy will verify /edit if neccessary by 10:00am

      Turbo
      Last edited by Turboman; 5th October 2010, 19:22:PM.

      Comment


      • Re: PPI and Court

        I presume that you have not contacted Co-Op successfully ??


        I have not phoned the bank yet, was going to do it this afternoon but my wife hurt her back so had to take her to the hospital.

        Thats not a great issue though as they have now had time to read those letters and I will phone them in the morning.

        PF


        If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

        sigpic

        Comment


        • Re: PPI and Court

          Sorry to hear about your wife PF, hope she will be okay.
          ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
          Originally posted by Turboman View Post
          xxxxx

          Sorry was meant to post up on this earlier Turbo, these little doggies are so lovely, they look well behaved too. X
          Last edited by di30; 5th October 2010, 19:24:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

          Comment


          • Re: PPI and Court


            Here you go the first one that I have gained a signature for.
            Last edited by pompeyfaith; 5th October 2010, 19:37:PM.
            If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

            sigpic

            Comment


            • Re: PPI and Court

              Right Pf

              Slow down--keep calm
              Everyone else -- no more tunes/photos or simple messages of supporrt

              We are at the sharp end now and need to focus on info in a few posts

              The Fos have commented today that
              1-they do not deal with DSAR
              2-they think the offer was reasonable
              3-they want PF to tell them the timeframe you want to extend their particular "deadline"

              I presume that you have not contacted Co-Op successfully ??

              Two issues then:

              FOS

              Reply to them with illustration on why they are wrong in saying that they believe that Co-Op have followed the guidelines (refer to the old letter which they say it is not up to them to understand the sums !!!

              Then as an illustration-we'll concentrate on JUST LOAN 1 which is easy to explain the difficiency in their offer in simple English Prose without the aid of spreadsheets.!!

              Then-we ask them to explain why they think its right
              and tell them the timeframe required to accept/ the offer be extended to14 days after full compliance with the DSAR (which is only asking for simple statements)

              Co-OP

              Keep up a civil relationship & conversation with Co-Op via phone-frequent fax & reminders that the timeframe is effectively 40 days


              Later tonight--I will draft your reply to FOS for tomorrow, hopefully Bill & Marshy will verify /edit if neccessary by 10:00am

              Thanks TM I will be at the PC in the morning.

              PF
              If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

              sigpic

              Comment


              • Re: PPI and Court

                Originally posted by Turboman View Post
                Right Pf

                Slow down--keep calm
                Everyone else -- no more tunes/photos or simple messages of supporrt

                We are at the sharp end now and need to focus on info in a few posts

                The Fos have commented today that
                1-they do not deal with DSAR
                2-they think the offer was reasonable
                3-they want PF to tell them the timeframe you want to extend their particular "deadline"

                I presume that you have not contacted Co-Op successfully ??

                Two issues then:

                FOS

                Reply to them with illustration on why they are wrong in saying that they believe that Co-Op have followed the guidelines (refer to the old letter which they say it is not up to them to understand the sums !!!

                Then as an illustration-we'll concentrate on JUST LOAN 1 which is easy to explain the difficiency in their offer in simple English Prose without the aid of spreadsheets.!!

                Then-we ask them to explain why they think its right
                and tell them the timeframe required to accept/ the offer be extended to14 days after full compliance with the DSAR (which is only asking for simple statements)

                Co-OP

                Keep up a civil relationship & conversation with Co-Op via phone-frequent fax & reminders that the timeframe is effectively 40 days


                Later tonight--I will draft your reply to FOS for tomorrow, hopefully Bill & Marshy will verify /edit if neccessary by 10:00am

                Turbo
                I think we can say that where they have quoted the rebates against the insurance for some loans they are correct (the rule 78 ones that is) BUT as regards Loan 1 we are in agreement with the redress but only cause Co-op have not verified that there was a rebate against the insurance.
                I would think that they would be co-operative (pardon the pun) in asking (nicely of course) them to verify if there was a rebate against this loan as we are definately in agreement that IF there was not then this one is definately more to come back.

                Like I say and will carry on saying....(sorry folks) I think they will verify with statements that this was the case. I don't want to sound negative here but I had the same problems with mine and they DID eventually send the statements and I was able to check them against what I settled and as Turbo will beable to confirm (i emailed my statement they were correct to the penny against the Stewart Calculator. The one they obviously use as when I say to the penny, they were correct to the exact penny.

                On saying this I had statements and settlement dates and we are a little vague on PF's settlement dates????

                Comment


                • Re: PPI and Court

                  Right --drafting out the Fos letter-Marsh--stop worrying--it is vastly to our advantage if they pluck a rebate out of the air!!!)

                  Marshy---this is the main part of my letter for FOS to illustrate to them that Co-Op are not complying with the basic guideline that the loan must be adjusted as if PPI had not been applied---only going to use Loan 1---please check it for me

                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  With reference to the first Loan--ref Account 80 in Co-op Offer Letter of 24th August 2010

                  Date of Agreement : 9/3/1999
                  Date of first payment: 9/4/1999

                  Total Monthly payment: £132.98
                  Monthly Pymnt Cach Loan: £108.21
                  Monthly Paymnt PPI Loan: £24.77

                  18 Total Payments made of £132.98= £2,393.64 (Co-op letter of 24/8/2010 £2,393.56)
                  18 PPI Payments made of £24.77= £445.86 (Co-op letter of 24/8/2010 £445.92)

                  So Co-op offer £445.92 + 8% interest on each payment = £360.84 (actually only calculated up to February 2010 ) = £806.76 (as in the letter of 24/8/2010)

                  However,we believe that the Co-Op have concealed the final payment to close the loan (calculated by the Stewart Rule of 78 Calculator-Equal instalments site & used by Co-Op ) of £4,486

                  of which that part attributable to the PPI part of the agreement = £835.75( 18.63%)---further attracting 8% interest from time of settlement of 9/10/2010. This 8% amounts to £626.83 (as at 24/8/2010)

                  Therefore the correct refund would be £806.76 (Co-op offer) + £835.75 + 626.83) = £2,269.34
                   

                  Comment


                  • Re: PPI and Court

                    Aha --Bill on line--your thoughts appreciated old mate

                    Comment


                    • Re: PPI and Court

                      OK PF--FOS reply

                      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Right PF—stop worrying—remember our strategy is to get info out of Co-Op—the FOS are effectively sidelined as the Co-Op must comply with our request under the DSAR Act
                      However, it pays to illustrate to the FOS also why we think they are wrong and bring up the letter that they did they do not have to understand the sums ( so who’s checking on who?) ?]

                      Comment


                      • Re: PPI and Court

                        If they say they don't have to understand the sums, then either they will need to point out the legislation that says they don't, or you will need to point out the legislation that says they do. Its not enough for you to say "Oh yes you do" cos they will just say "Oh no we don't". Perhaps someone should look at the FOS's remit and see exactly what their guidelines are, and what guidelines they have on how to interpret their guidelines?? As in, when the CO-Op say they are following the FOS guidleines - what do the guidelines actually say? And where does it say that FOS have to understand the sums? Yes I know that would be the logical assumption, but you have to remember that this is an official body, a policing organisation, if you like. Since when did the words "official body" and "logical" go together in the same sentence?
                        Is no longer here

                        Comment


                        • Re: PPI and Court

                          Originally posted by WendyB View Post
                          If they say they don't have to understand the sums, then either they will need to point out the legislation that says they don't, or you will need to point out the legislation that says they do. Its not enough for you to say "Oh yes you do" cos they will just say "Oh no we don't". Perhaps someone should look at the FOS's remit and see exactly what their guidelines are, and what guidelines they have on how to interpret their guidelines?? As in, when the CO-Op say they are following the FOS guidleines - what do the guidelines actually say? And where does it say that FOS have to understand the sums? Yes I know that would be the logical assumption, but you have to remember that this is an official body, a policing organisation, if you like. Since when did the words "official body" and "logical" go together in the same sentence?

                          Thanks Wendy--Can you run with this one for the morning Di as you know the sites

                          Turbo

                          Comment


                          • Re: PPI and Court

                            Hmmm.......have this been posted on here at all?

                            http://www.financial-ombudsman-probl...guidelines.htm

                            Comment


                            • Re: PPI and Court

                              The above link also takes you into the link here too.....
                              http://www.financial-ombudsman-problems.co.uk/index.htm

                              Comment


                              • Re: PPI and Court

                                if they say they do not have to understand the sums then what is the point in having a calculations team? And is that not defenting the object of the fos ?
                                If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X