Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

[Amethyst]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Thing with Carl's lot was the company that the credit card payments went through was allegedly owned by a.n.other so although in reality Carl was the controlling mind of all the companies, on paper he wasn't. Had LIL been owned by a different person on paper than liposuction ltd... or whatever they were called... then would the judgment have been the same?

[EXC]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Not sure if this old Mirror article has been posted.

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigat...refu.html#more

We treat each case on its individual merits, as we did in this case, but unfortunately Mrs Malouf did not have full contracts for either plot or any written guarantees on the profitability of the land or the granting of planning permission.

I wonder how many contracts MBNA can lay their hands on which guarantee profitability and planning permission?

[pt2537]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Not sure if this old Mirror article has been posted.

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigat...refu.html#more



I wonder how many contracts MBNA can lay their hands on which guarantee profitability and planning permission?

Hi Exc

Haha the Mirror gave evidence in this case tooo, they did an investigation etc.

The Hayden James literature promised they would obtain planning and it guarantees profit too, when they knew it wasn't the case. Most of the people scammed will have their order forms and papers, that's what im seeing currently anyhow,

[EXC]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

And am I right in saying that there was a contractual provision preventing the investors from contacting the planning authorities themselves?

[Guest]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

There seems to be the issue of the absurdity of the existence of a credit agreement without the goods being supplied keeps coming up as the main issue despite it not being allowed, yet the section 75 issue keeps being pursued.

[Nibbler]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Seems to be on here now. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2014/1.html

[pt2537]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Seems to be on here now. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2014/1.html

And here http://www.credittoday.co.uk/article...raft-of-claims

And also will be in the Mirror, Lexis Nexis are also going to host an article on this area of law too and the case, BBC and other organizations are looking at it too

[jon1965]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

The way they reported it makes this Tilley bloke sound like a criminal

[PlanB]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

And am I right in saying that there was a contractual provision preventing the investors from contacting the planning authorities themselves?

Was there really :scared:

That in itself would have flagged up an "uh oh" moment for me.

[pt2537]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

And am I right in saying that there was a contractual provision preventing the investors from contacting the planning authorities themselves?

Yes sir you are correct. The investors were forbidden from doing so under threat of breach of contract actions

[jon1965]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Was there really :scared:

That in itself would have flagged up an "uh oh" moment for me.

That would have been enough for me to say "my brain hurts"

I do think it is a fantastic result for common sense

[Amethyst]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Small piece on this blog too :- http://assetlandscamgroup.wordpress....e-28-jan-2014/