Tweet
Originally posted by Rico
View Post
Loading...
-
This next week is going to be one hell of a week for consumers im hoping. There will be some news which i will be breaking next week, cant say anything more at this stage as im bound until judgment, but mark my words there will be a sad bank indeed out there.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Tags: None -
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Boy am I looking forward to that one. Should be a stonker.Originally posted by pt2537 View Post -
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Can't make up my mind which bank I'd prefer that to be..... There are too many who deserve the pain. :tinysmile_hmm_t2:Originally posted by pt2537 View PostComment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
PT you are such a tease. When you can release it maybe a general email or at least a link on this thread please please pretty pleaseComment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Originally posted by jon1965 View Post
No teasing just the way these things are implemented, comments after actual deliberation.Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Pt's comment above was before the "deliberation" though, I would call that a tease.Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
Not complaining mind you, something to look forward to.
Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
I think (or hope) that PT knows me well enough by know to see a sarky comment when he sees oneComment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
*** taps foot ***
Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Well it ain't bloody morning now. He does like keeping us in suspendersComment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
LOLOriginally posted by Nibbler View Post*** taps foot ***
Just about to post the same
Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Press release approved
Awaiting publication
Judgment against MBNA on a section 75 fraudulent Misrep caseI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Oooooh! Interesting.Originally posted by pt2537 View PostComment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
http://www.qualitysolicitors.com/howlettclarke/news/Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Indeed, it was a very interesting case.Originally posted by Nibbler View Post
MBNA fought tooth n nail to keep it out of the High Court.
They did get an order of indemnity costs too, so this in my view shows the Courts distaste of what was clearly poor conduct throughout the claim.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Comment
-
Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014
Just skim read the summary. The credit card companies are going to utterly loath you for that judgement. Well done.
Comment
Comment