Hi, Can I have some advice please.
Money claim online done and was road to add any trading names of the business so I did.... .mr Joe blogs t/a blogs repairs.
Fast forward to beginning of march had final hearing which defendant didn't turn up (didn't turn up for anything throuought or engage apart from respond to initial claim notification online).
I was awarded a judgement where judge said this will impact him financially such as credit etc.... and he has 14days to pay when he gets the letter.
Both received the letter says I'm awarded the sum of £xxxx. The letter has at the top me and Joe blogs t/a blogs repairs. In the boxes to the right says me as claimant and defendant as Mr Joe blogs.
Hes told me he'll pay 50 a month on the 1st and not received it today and he's said he's closing the business.
I've told him that it's irrelevant closing the business as sole trader not limited company so debt will still be owing and that I will take further.
He said there's no ccj against him as he's checked his credit file. He also said any judgement or ccj will be against blogs repairs and not him.
Here's my questions.
Who's right about the name ?
Why wasn't the judgement a ccj but instead a judgement order?
Thanks.
Money claim online done and was road to add any trading names of the business so I did.... .mr Joe blogs t/a blogs repairs.
Fast forward to beginning of march had final hearing which defendant didn't turn up (didn't turn up for anything throuought or engage apart from respond to initial claim notification online).
I was awarded a judgement where judge said this will impact him financially such as credit etc.... and he has 14days to pay when he gets the letter.
Both received the letter says I'm awarded the sum of £xxxx. The letter has at the top me and Joe blogs t/a blogs repairs. In the boxes to the right says me as claimant and defendant as Mr Joe blogs.
Hes told me he'll pay 50 a month on the 1st and not received it today and he's said he's closing the business.
I've told him that it's irrelevant closing the business as sole trader not limited company so debt will still be owing and that I will take further.
He said there's no ccj against him as he's checked his credit file. He also said any judgement or ccj will be against blogs repairs and not him.
Here's my questions.
Who's right about the name ?
Why wasn't the judgement a ccj but instead a judgement order?
Thanks.
Comment