Your defence needs to go in before Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Court claim received
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Court claim received
Your defence needs to go in before Tuesday, August 11, 2015
-
Re: Court claim received
Ok Jon, so I've heard nothing from Lowells, sent the postal order but had no paperwork back, BC sent his usual template letter which I have replied back to, what now, how long have I got left to save my bacon from these muppets?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
I think you'll need to post on the thread for now
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Responded to PM.
The Carter reply is just his regular template Carts.
See PM for further info.
nem
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Hello Carts,Originally posted by carts69 View PostSo why is BC still hounding me by phone despite the recent claim form? Called twice today!
How many calls are you receiving over all? This can be stopped quite easily.
I've PM'd you Carts
nemLast edited by nemesis45; 14th July 2015, 08:22:AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Glad to be of help. Depending on your circumstances they would probably rather get a lump sum than cribs and drabs through the court.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Ok, thanks Jon, they are easy enough to ignore, just curious why?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Maybe because the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing or maybe because they fear they do not have a good claim and want to bully you into settle. If you want to stop them calling there is a letter you can send. Nothing heavy just
Dear Sir Ref xxxxxxx
Further to your recent telephone calls that I find personally harassing please take not that I will only communicate in writing via Royal Mail . I would remind you that not only is it my right to give reasonable requests as to methods of contact but also of the recent case Roberts v Bank of Scotland Plc (Rev 1) [2013] EWCA Civ 882 (11 June 2013)
Yours Faithfully
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
So why is BC still hounding me by phone despite the recent claim form? Called twice today!
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Endorse PO " For Statutory Fee Only" don't use a PO Box No. in Lowell's address, Just Ellington House, 9 Savannah Way etc. PO Box addresses my not sign for items.Originally posted by carts69 View PostOk, CCA request with a £1 postal order next, anyone got Lowells address for me please?
- - - Updated - - -
Scrub that, it's on the claim form
woke up too early!
Crossed or un crossed PO or doesn't it matter, payable to Lowell I presume or leave it blank?
nem
- - - Updated - - -
OK Carts no problem!!Originally posted by carts69 View PostGreat advice from everyone, but Nem...I would like your help with this please, it's much easier to deal with one person rather than different people overloading my head.
nem
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
No right or wrong answer as to crossed or blank. I would probably cross it but leave it blank.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Court claim received
Ok, CCA request with a £1 postal order next, anyone got Lowells address for me please?
- - - Updated - - -
Scrub that, it's on the claim form
woke up too early!
Crossed or un crossed PO or doesn't it matter, payable to Lowell I presume or leave it blank?Last edited by carts69; 12th July 2015, 08:22:AM.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: