Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

lol funny !

Hope you don't mean my WS!

[Amethyst]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

pmsl nooooooooooooo the envelope.... they still arguing the same thing now?

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

pmsl nooooooooooooo the envelope.... they still arguing the same thing now?

Guess I'll be able to answer that when/if I receive new W/S! :lol:

So, just to confirm, (apologies for being a worrier) as nothing has changed since submitting WS for SJ hearing, I simply submit further copy to Restons and the court, after agreeing with them a date for simultaneous exchange?

Ame, many thanks for all your help today.:_tighthug__by_darkm

[Amethyst]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Yip, I'd say so, though I'd update the WS to include the more recent happenings (disclosure etc).....ie ad a couple of ... On XX/XX/XX I received X, Y,Z an so on.

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Somewhat surprised this morning to receive a written request from Restons asking for confirmation about something in our disclosure statement. Now, as the order states that all requests for clarification or further info based on a document disclosed should be made within 21 days of disclosure, a date that has long since passed; I don't think we'll be able to help them, do you?!! :tongue2:

[pt2537]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

ive commented on the other thread,

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Hi all,

Just tweaking our W/S used to defeat the SJ application and have a couple of questions please.

1. In HFC's t&c's (those that they allege would have been on the back of the application form) it is stated that they may terminate "subject to service of any notice required by law".
Should I add that to the W/S?

2. Assume it would be prudent to point out that Carey & McGuffick do not apply?

3. As the other side are already in possession of all the documents exhibited, is there any need to forward further copies?


TIA x

[Amethyst]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

What have they asked for confirmation of?

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

What have they asked for confirmation of?

That the envelope in my disclosure list was the one mentioned in WS for SJ !!!

[Amethyst]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Ohhh lol. Don't see any reason that would be a problem to confirm really, but I am not privvy to your other thread. I don't know if you have sent them a copy of the envelope (or is that what they are asking to inspect?).

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Ohhh lol. Don't see any reason that would be a problem to confirm really, but I am not privvy to your other thread. I don't know if you have sent them a copy of the envelope (or is that what they are asking to inspect?).

Ame,

'pt' responded OTR to this. I have informed Restons that it is indeed one of the same and they already have a copy of it.

Are you able to help with my questions in post#37 above?

[Amethyst]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Cool.

1: I dont see any need to its a standard phrase

2: If they have bought the cases up then yes rebuff them in the WS, if not, then dont.

3. If they have them no, but a letter reminding them they have them might be in order, (with your WS as I assume these are WS Exhibits ? ) but add if they need further copies you'll happily provide them (ie dont be obstructive just helpful and mindful of costs and trees) Assume you will provide court with the exhibits ?

Have they asked for them in inspection or just the envelope ?

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

Cool.

1: I dont see any need to its a standard phrase

2: If they have bought the cases up then yes rebuff them in the WS, if not, then dont.

3. If they have them no, but a letter reminding them they have them might be in order, (with your WS as I assume these are WS Exhibits ? ) but add if they need further copies you'll happily provide them (ie dont be obstructive just helpful and mindful of costs and trees) Assume you will provide court with the exhibits ?

Have they asked for them in inspection or just the envelope ?

They already have copies of all exhibits.


Thanks once again for your help. x

[Delfi]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

HFC don't like me much ... well, they probably really dislike me. They picked a fight and the consequence was a precedent that carries some weight

I hope that they end up not liking you nearly as much as me.

D

[fluffystuff]

Re: Fluffystuff's OH v HFC

HFC don't like me much ... well, they probably really dislike me. They picked a fight and the consequence was a precedent that carries some weight

I hope that they end up not liking you nearly as much as me.

D

So do I Delfi, so do I. ray2: