Originally posted by jaguarsuk
View Post
I'm using The Sheriffs Office.
Originally posted by jaguarsuk
View Post
The 'guidance' stated that (verbatim) :
"She asked why the amount has increased from the judgment order , I told her that the matter has been taken to court and we cannot answer that for hr. she will have contact the coot or the client directly".
Yes, they really did put 'hr' and 'coot'; but putting the bad grammar aside, I'm not happy that the Sheriffs Office advised the Defendant to contact the court or the client (myself) to find out why the amount had increased. The Defendant did phone me a few times last week, but I didn't answer, as I didn't want to get embroiled in a futile argument.
The message, that I've had, states that the Defendant has said that they'll pay the 'command' figure. From what I've seen on the Internet, the 'Command' figure appears to be the original amount put forward by the court. I'm slightly concerned, because I don't think the Defendant realises the implications of not paying the full amount on time.
I'm disappointed also, that none of the documentation I've received from the Sheriffs Office gives the name of the Sender. All their documents conclude with :
'Yours faithfully,
The Sheriffs Office'
From whom have I received the emails ? - and where's the accountability ?
Thank you, by the way, for taking the trouble to reply !
Comment