• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

*** Won *** Judgment issued, but bar subsequently put in place ?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jaguarsuk View Post

    I don't know what HCE firm you have used, but they sound like a bunch of cowboys.
    Yes, that's my impression too !

    I'm using The Sheriffs Office.

    Originally posted by jaguarsuk View Post

    As for explaining to the defendant, that's the HCEO's job and they should explain that the debt has risen due to the debtor failing to pay. And, the longer they take to cough up the larger that amount is going to get.
    I agree entirely with this ^^^.

    The 'guidance' stated that (verbatim) :

    "She asked why the amount has increased from the judgment order , I told her that the matter has been taken to court and we cannot answer that for hr. she will have contact the coot or the client directly".

    Yes, they really did put 'hr' and 'coot'; but putting the bad grammar aside, I'm not happy that the Sheriffs Office advised the Defendant to contact the court or the client (myself) to find out why the amount had increased. The Defendant did phone me a few times last week, but I didn't answer, as I didn't want to get embroiled in a futile argument.

    The message, that I've had, states that the Defendant has said that they'll pay the 'command' figure. From what I've seen on the Internet, the 'Command' figure appears to be the original amount put forward by the court. I'm slightly concerned, because I don't think the Defendant realises the implications of not paying the full amount on time.

    I'm disappointed also, that none of the documentation I've received from the Sheriffs Office gives the name of the Sender. All their documents conclude with :

    'Yours faithfully,

    The Sheriffs Office'

    From whom have I received the emails ? - and where's the accountability ?

    Thank you, by the way, for taking the trouble to reply !
    Last edited by kettlaness; 20th May 2019, 14:31:PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by kettlaness View Post

      Yes, that's my impression too !

      I'm using The Sheriffs Office.



      I agree entirely with this ^^^.

      The 'guidance' stated that (verbatim) :

      "She asked why the amount has increased from the judgment order , I told her that the matter has been taken to court and we cannot answer that for hr. she will have contact the coot or the client directly".

      Yes, they really did put 'hr' and 'coot'; but putting the bad grammar aside, I'm not happy that the Sheriffs Office advised the Defendant to contact the court or the client (myself) to find out why the amount had increased. The Defendant did phone me a few times last week, but I didn't answer, as I didn't want to get embroiled in a futile argument.

      The message, that I've had, states that the Defendant has said that they'll pay the 'command' figure. From what I've seen on the Internet, the 'Command' figure appears to be the original amount put forward by the court. I'm slightly concerned, because I don't think the Defendant realises the implications of not paying the full amount on time.

      I'm disappointed also, that none of the documentation I've received from the Sheriffs Office gives the name of the Sender. All their documents conclude with :

      'Yours faithfully,

      The Sheriffs Office'

      From whom have I received the emails ? - and where's the accountability ?

      Thank you, by the way, for taking the trouble to reply !
      I'd be inclined to fire back at "The Sheriffs Office" that it is them who should be explaining to the defendant as my agent that costs of obtaining a writ of control plus their fees have been added to the original judgement due to none payment and that failure by the defendant to pay the entirety now outstanding will mean enforcement will continue until everything is paid.

      They sound about as much use as a chocolate fireguard though, so you might be best just explaining to the defendant in writing the current position.

      Dear Defendant

      RE: You -v- Defendant in the <<PLACE>> County Court Claim No: XXXXXXXX

      I write regarding the judgement in the above matter dated XX/XX/20XX.

      I have been informed by my agents that you are querying the amount now outstanding in this matter and am taking this opportunity to clarify the position, so that you may make payment of the balance.

      The judgement issued against you stated that the sum adjudged to me be paid by XX/XX/20XX and you failed to settle the judgement. Consequently I escalated the matter to the High Court for enforcement at your further cost and employed the agents who have sent you notice of intention to enforce the Writ of Control I have now been grated at your even further cost.

      The outstanding balance therefore comprises the judgement, cost of a Writ of Control and ongoing costs of High Court Enforcement Officers (HCEO).

      Should you continue to refuse to settle the amount owing further costs will be added by the HCEO's until you have settled in full. Please note that now paying the original judgement will not suffice to settle this matter and the HCEO's have been instructed to fully recover the sum owed inclusive of any further fees.

      It is therefore in your interest to settle this matter with the HCEO at your earliest convenience and they may be reached on <<TEL NUMBER>>.

      For the avoidance of doubt it is not my intention to accept any form of reduced settlement with you or to communicate directly with you further.

      Regards
      You
      Send a copy to the defendant recorded delivery and then a copy of the letter and delivery confirmation to the HCEO, then tell them to get on with it.

      The defendant cannot claim they do not know what's going on to stall the HCEO after that.
      COMPLETING AN N180 DIRECTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (SMALL CLAIMS TRACK) GUIDE

      My posts here are based on my experience of a variety of life events. I have no formal legal training & if in doubt take professional legal advice or contact CAB. If you follow anything I write here you do so at your own risk & I accept no liability for any loss, costs or other outcomes.

      Private messages are disabled as help is only offered publicly. I do not come on here in the evening, at weekends or on public holidays.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by jaguarsuk View Post

        I'd be inclined to fire back at "The Sheriffs Office" that it is them who should be explaining to the defendant as my agent that costs of obtaining a writ of control plus their fees have been added to the original judgement due to none payment and that failure by the defendant to pay the entirety now outstanding will mean enforcement will continue until everything is paid.

        They sound about as much use as a chocolate fireguard though, so you might be best just explaining to the defendant in writing the current position.



        Send a copy to the defendant recorded delivery and then a copy of the letter and delivery confirmation to the HCEO, then tell them to get on with it.

        The defendant cannot claim they do not know what's going on to stall the HCEO after that.

        Thank you so much !!!

        I'll do exactly as you've suggested !

        You've been a terrific help - much appreciated !

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse
        1 of 2 < >

        SHORTCUTS


        First Steps
        Check dates
        Income/Expenditure
        Acknowledge Claim
        CCA Request
        CPR 31.14 Request
        Subject Access Request Letter
        Example Defence
        Set Aside Application
        Directions Questionnaire



        If you received a court claim and would like some help and support dealing with it, please read the first steps and make a new thread in the forum with as much information as you can.





        NOTE: If you receive a court claim note these dates in your calendar ...
        Acknowledge Claim - within 14 days from Service

        Defend Claim - within 28 days from Service (IF you acknowledged in time)

        If you fail to Acknowledge the claim you may have a default judgment awarded against you, likewise, if you fail to enter your defence within 28 days from Service.




        We now feature a number of specialist consumer credit debt solicitors on our sister site, JustBeagle.com
        If your case is over £10,000 or particularly complex it may be worth a chat with a solicitor, often they will be able to help on a fixed fee or CFA (no win, no fee) basis.
        2 of 2 < >

        Support LegalBeagles


        Donate with PayPal button

        LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

        See more
        See less

        Court Claim ?

        Guides and Letters
        Loading...



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X