Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Keep pushing along Di you know of all the problems i had with my adjudicator and as you know i also got the impression very keenly that they didn't want me to take my cap 1 case to the ombudsman,in fora penny in for a pound my woman,all you'll lose is time,it won't cost you anything though,give it a go.

Yes I got the distinct impression that the adjudicator did not want me to persist with a Bank of Scotland one but I have!
i wonder if it was the same one?
The other is still with a different adjudicator and this is the one with Halifax for which I posted the document earlier

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Well done with M&S.
When did you put your complaint in? I have had 2 complaints in with them, one a credit card and one a loan, and they have been on hold since March 2011. Don't get any joy when I call and was told it could be weeks or months and no time scale available.

It was a spur of the moment thing, I was sorting out all my documents and came across all the documents, including the ones from the collection company, I rang them initially on or about the beginning of April, just before the judgment, had to phone them and got very frustrated as they have recently changed to an overseas call centre.
Did a cca and initially they said they "could not find evidence etc but sent me the form from them asking about ppi I filled it in and sent it back with copies of the original documents I had that had it added.
It then took a further month and just over the 28 days they asked for on the 12th of last monht but I got it and sent the acceptance form back today.
With the help and support both to myself and others it was LB that made me persist and insist on written responses still got to here from both the others and the Cabot one has not been as successful to date but again not giving up!

[cappo]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Well done to everyone with success.

I have been having a nightmare of a day and on limited time now on getting everything else in to the Adjudicator - to have this reviewed by the ombudsman, but I feel he's trying to put us off.

If anyone gets a few mins, I would be happy to hear your opinions on my Hamilton/HFC matter please.

I have a huge headache and its like talking to a brick wall with the adjudicator at the moment.

Here below is the link to my thread, cheers folks, oh and here is the email below as well received from the Adjudicator, think he was a bit short myself but I'm not ready to give up quite yet, cheers.

Dear Mr & Mrs

I have spoken to HFC this morning in an attempt to speed up the process as promised. I explained that you felt that they were involved in the sale of the PPI policy and maybe responsible for that sale.

HFC explained to me that this was not the case and the loan and PPI were arranged on the same date by Click Finance. This is evidenced by the fact that the broker was paid commission for the sale of the insurance.

Therefore in light of these submissions, I would need some concrete evidence from you and Mrs ***** to show that it was not Click Finance that sold you the PPI policy.

I look forward to hearing from you by 30 June 2011.

Yours sincerely
M
Adjudicator | Financial Ombudsman Service
South Quay Plaza | 183 Marsh Wall | London | E14 9




http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...t=27433&page=6

Keep pushing along Di you know of all the problems i had with my adjudicator and as you know i also got the impression very keenly that they did'nt want me to take my cap 1 case to the ombudsman,in fora penny in for a pound my woman,all you'll lose is time,it won't cost you anything though,give it a go.

[di30]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Well done to everyone with success.

I have been having a nightmare of a day and on limited time now on getting everything else in to the Adjudicator - to have this reviewed by the ombudsman, but I feel he's trying to put us off.

If anyone gets a few mins, I would be happy to hear your opinions on my Hamilton/HFC matter please.

I have a huge headache and its like talking to a brick wall with the adjudicator at the moment.

Here below is the link to my thread, cheers folks, oh and here is the email below as well received from the Adjudicator, think he was a bit short myself but I'm not ready to give up quite yet, cheers.

Dear Mr & Mrs

I have spoken to HFC this morning in an attempt to speed up the process as promised. I explained that you felt that they were involved in the sale of the PPI policy and maybe responsible for that sale.

HFC explained to me that this was not the case and the loan and PPI were arranged on the same date by Click Finance. This is evidenced by the fact that the broker was paid commission for the sale of the insurance.

Therefore in light of these submissions, I would need some concrete evidence from you and Mrs ***** to show that it was not Click Finance that sold you the PPI policy.

I look forward to hearing from you by 30 June 2011.

Yours sincerely
M
Adjudicator | Financial Ombudsman Service
South Quay Plaza | 183 Marsh Wall | London | E14 9




http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...t=27433&page=6

[flossie]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Yes go for it!
Know that M and s are HSBC and it took nearly ten weeks, thought they were going to reject as for a time the one I claimed for went to a collection company but I was able to pay it off when i got my pension lump sum in 2005.


:beagle:

Well done with M&S.
When did you put your complaint in? I have had 2 complaints in with them, one a credit card and one a loan, and they have been on hold since March 2011. Don't get any joy when I call and was told it could be weeks or months and no time scale available.

[debtisbad]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

From today's Times:


The widespread mis-selling of payment protection insurance may have turned into a nightmare for the big high street banks, but it is manna from heaven for those given the task of sorting out the whole sorry mess.

Interim Partners, a recruitment firm that, as its name suggests, supplies interim managers, says that the surge in PPI claims has created unprecedented demand from financial institutions for temporary staff to deal with them.

The rewards for such interim staff are not unattractive, starting at £200 to £300 a day for claims processors, rising to about £800 for those who hire and manage teams of processors and as much as £1,500 a day for interim managers with experience of PPI products.

The firm’s Andrew McIntee says: “The number of consumers the FSA has said should be compensated is so high that it will take an army of contractors and senior managers to work through all the claims.”

Most people who post on here would be more than capable of managing teams of people. Let's go and get recruited!

[enaid]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

They deserve a nightmare for what they have put a lot of decent people through over the years.
I hope it costs them trillions and then they may get the picture, we want good customer service, fair treatment, no hidden penalties and a regulator that has the power and the bottle to make sure we get em.
Enaid x

[EXC]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

From today's Times:


The widespread mis-selling of payment protection insurance may have turned into a nightmare for the big high street banks, but it is manna from heaven for those given the task of sorting out the whole sorry mess.

Interim Partners, a recruitment firm that, as its name suggests, supplies interim managers, says that the surge in PPI claims has created unprecedented demand from financial institutions for temporary staff to deal with them.

The rewards for such interim staff are not unattractive, starting at £200 to £300 a day for claims processors, rising to about £800 for those who hire and manage teams of processors and as much as £1,500 a day for interim managers with experience of PPI products.

The firm’s Andrew McIntee says: “The number of consumers the FSA has said should be compensated is so high that it will take an army of contractors and senior managers to work through all the claims.”

[cappo]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Thanks Di I was very pleased - and surprised, tbh - to get the FOS letter as this one is sooooooooooooo early I really thought LTSB would be able to wriggle their way out of it, but it would appear not

It's definitely worth having a try with yours - nothing ventured, nothing gained as they say...........and very good luck to you with them!!! I had nothing except the account number and a distinct recollection of being told I had to have PPI to be accepted for the loan - as I was very young and naive at the time I fell for it but having paid seven years worth of premiums I reckon my naivety will pay off once the refund cheque arrives, lol!!! Mind you, I'm still struggling to see how they'll work out how much to refund when they insisted that no paperwork was kept for something dating back so far. It makes you wonder just how long they really do keep documentation for..................

Nellie xxx

Probably for as long as reliable computer records are kept,back to the early ninties i'd say.

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Yes go for it!
Know that M and s are HSBC and it took nearly ten weeks, thought they were going to reject as for a time the one I claimed for went to a collection company but I was able to pay it off when i got my pension lump sum in 2005.
However n the letter as reply she goes on about that she will not "go into" my specific concerns etc and this was for a different account only one I had to them was a store card abd that was defuct over seven years ag0
Still wainting on the Barckyas and Bank of Scotland x 2 but may have to fully SAR the Halifax one as Cabot still tring to wriggle out of the fact that this is showing s no longer a valid debt


:beagle:

[nelliewops]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Nellie, so sorry to have missed this one earlier, that is fab news! Well done!

This is giving me hope now on another 2 we had with Lloyds 1996 and 1997, the only issue is - is again lack of paperwork, although as you know my recent wins via Lloyds on my thread I have just been successful on them 2 dated from late 1999 to 2001, and with lack of paperwork as well.

However, I remember the 1996-97 loans very well, with them being our first ever ones, and still remember the repayment of £111.18 a month lol.

Do you think there's hope for me on these hun? cheers x
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------



WOW, Well done to you! fab news this, made me smile big time anyway lol x

Thanks Di I was very pleased - and surprised, tbh - to get the FOS letter as this one is sooooooooooooo early I really thought LTSB would be able to wriggle their way out of it, but it would appear not

It's definitely worth having a try with yours - nothing ventured, nothing gained as they say...........and very good luck to you with them!!! I had nothing except the account number and a distinct recollection of being told I had to have PPI to be accepted for the loan - as I was very young and naive at the time I fell for it but having paid seven years worth of premiums I reckon my naivety will pay off once the refund cheque arrives, lol!!! Mind you, I'm still struggling to see how they'll work out how much to refund when they insisted that no paperwork was kept for something dating back so far. It makes you wonder just how long they really do keep documentation for..................

Nellie xxx

[cappo]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

RESULT!
This is one i had with Marks and Spencer which was settled in 2005
had to wait almost 10 weeks but had an offer in the post today which I am more than happy with, Just Barclay's and Bank of Scotland (x2) then!
Could not have done it with out all the advice from you guys
xxx
DT

Nice one DT:beagle::tongue2::doggieyes:
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------

Nellie, so sorry to have missed this one earlier, that is fab news! Well done!

This is giving me hope now on another 2 we had with Lloyds 1996 and 1997, the only issue is - is again lack of paperwork, although as you know my recent wins via Lloyds on my thread I have just been successful on them 2 dated from late 1999 to 2001, and with lack of paperwork as well.

However, I remember the 1996-97 loans very well, with them being our first ever ones, and still remember the repayment of £111.18 a month lol.

Do you think there's hope for me on these hun? cheers x
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------



WOW, Well done to you! fab news this, made me smile big time anyway lol x

Don't see why not Di.

[EXC]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

In the wake of the PPI scandal things are really hotting up on the regulatory front.

HM Treasury has today issued a White Paper that includes a provision to amalgamate and speed up compensation claims for mis-selling - as reported in the FT:


Mis-selling cases to get fast track treatment
Cases of widespread mis-selling of financial products are to be handled as a group to limit harm to consumers and speed compensation claims under draft regulation reforms unveiled by the government.
Traditionally complaints about financial services are handled case by case, but this is to change following recent scandals involving payment protection insurance and poor investment advice to vulnerable customers.

FT.com / UK / Politics policy - Mis-selling cases to get fast track treatment


In addition the FSA have published the provisional findings to their consultation on Product Intervention which would give the soon-to-be established Financial Conduct Authority the power to unilaterally ban products. Up till now in order to get a product banned the OFT have to hold an investigation and then make a reference to the Competition Commission who would duplicate a further lengthy inquiry. In the case of single premium and regular premium PPI sold at the point-of-sale, the banning process took a ridiculous 5 years.

Also the European Commission ''is considering the issue of EU-wide product bans''.


Looking at one of the most high-profile cases in recent times, the current regulatory system,
involving work by the Office of Fair Trading, the Competition Commission and the FSA,
was eventually able to deal with the problems inherent in sales of Payment Protection
Insurance (PPI). However, this took several years to achieve appropriate redress for
consumers, was subjected to a judicial review and will cost the industry billions of pounds
in compensation. We believe that developing the current system to strengthen our ability
to supervise and enforce earlier in the value chain would have substantial benefits to
consumers and to firms by helping prevent the recurrence of this type of scenario. As the
FCA is to have a lower risk tolerance than the FSA and will aim to stop detriment from
occurring in the first place, this seems necessary.

Further to the discussion in chapter 2, we believe that high standards in product
governance are essential to achieve good customer outcomes. As part of this, we
will make sure that the FSA – and, in due course, the FCA – has the right regulatory
framework in which to operate. While the current framework does cover product governance,
new rules will be necessary in order to deliver the best results. The Payment Protection Insurance
(PPI) case shows some of the limits of the current approach, where it took some
years to reach the right outcomes, and problems which could have been eliminated
at an earlier stage developed to cause detriment to a great many consumers.

As the FCA is to have a lower risk tolerance than the FSA, we need to find a way to
guard against the repetition of such a situation.To address this we will develop additional
rules in support of the current framework.

We consider that, by intervening earlier in the value chain, the regulator will be able to prevent
consumer detriment before it crystallises, or limit it, rather than seeking ex post redress (as has
been the case with Payment Protection Insurance (PPI)).

We note that the Treasury’s recent consultation proposes that the FCA begiven the power to
ban products. In addition, the European Commission isconsidering the issue of EU-wide product
bans.

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/discussion/fs11_03.pdf

[di30]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

RESULT!
This is one i had with Marks and Spencer which was settled in 2005
had to wait almost 10 weeks but had an offer in the post today which I am more than happy with, Just Barclay's and Bank of Scotland (x2) then!
Could not have done it with out all the advice from you guys
xxx
DT

Well done DT!
That is very pleasing news, great work!

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

RESULT!
This is one i had with Marks and Spencer which was settled in 2005
had to wait almost 10 weeks but had an offer in the post today which I am more than happy with, Just Barclay's and Bank of Scotland (x2) then!
Could not have done it with out all the advice from you guys
xxx
DT