Cabot Financial UK Ltd

[mystery1]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

The cases I deal with elsewhere are not on any public forum M1
The POC's are essentially the same.
nem

I know they're not but i would like to see them if possible. I'm not interested in the cases per se but i just want to check the details pre and post amendment.

E.g.

"Claimant: Cabot Financial UK Ltd
Document/Payments Address: Weightmans LLP

Particulars of Claim:
1. The Defendant entered into a credit agreement described by the origianl creditor as OPUS CREDIT CARD-CREDIT CARD and having account number 000110500000126xxxx ('the Account').
2. The Claimant, a UK limited compnay with comany number 3757424, is the assignee and legal owner of all rights previously enjoyed by the original creditor in respect of the Account.
3. The Defendant is indebted to the Claimant in respect of ths account in the sum of 7175.20
4. The Claimant claims the said sum of 7175.20, plus costs


Amount Claimed: 7175.20
Court Fee: 410
Solicitor's costs: 100
Total Amount: 7685.20"



Now if they amended the claim and that statement is false in the original, that's a problem. If it's unchanged in the amended version then that's a problem.

Clearly it cannot be correct pre and post amendment. If it's the same person that signed both claims they have much explaining to do and i'd be asking the court to refer the matter to the AG.

M1

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

The cases I deal with elsewhere are not on any public forum M1
The POC's are essentially the same.
nem

[mystery1]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

The ones where they amended. I'd like to see the statement of claims before and after. I suspect there are serious issues which the legal team(s) may have overlooked which are, i think, blatantly obvious.

M1

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

Bump.

M1

Referring to which claims M1?

nem

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

We now have another Cabot thread.
One claim from Cabot Financial UK Ltd West Malling
2nd Claim from Cabot Financial Uk Ltd Marlin House Worthing
for the same debt.

nem

[mystery1]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

The particulars of the claim i.e. the statement of case. Have they changed at all or is it just the claimant details on the top left that changed ?

M1

Bump.

M1

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

I cant see how it can be desirable to substitute the Claimant when there is an illegality issue, quite simply substitution can be challenged on this head alone.

Good evening PT are we actually sure there is an illegality here?
I guess we will not know until the status of an Cabot Financial UK Ltd, claim is challenged.

nem

[Berniethebolt]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

I cant see how it can be desirable to substitute the Claimant when there is an illegality issue, quite simply substitution can be challenged on this head alone.

problem is PT that the vast majority of people will have no knowledge of this so cabot will get away with minimal damage . What can be done to make them suffer -yes I am kinky where DCA's and debt purchasers are concerned - beat them beat them

[Berniethebolt]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

Thanks Nem
If memory serves me that was only 2 or 3 years ago, complete crossed wires . Glad its sorted

[pt2537]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

I have has contact from the FCA regarding the Cabot affair and have listed the
various " problems " experienced " with their conduct including the current nonsense and
The 40 days to comply with a CCA request, the refusal of their solicitors to comply with CPR 31.14.
and everything else I can think of.
Jon the Lowell situation was similar to the Cabot reorganisation of the group with the connection
with Interlaken Group and later Freds.
The Register at present does not appear to be up to date.

nem

19.2
(1) This rule applies where a party is to be added or substituted except where the case falls within rule 19.5 (special provisions about changing parties after the end of a relevant limitation period^(GL)).
(2) The court may order a person to be added as a new party if –
(a) it is desirable to add the new party so that the court can resolve all the matters in dispute in the proceedings; or
(b) there is an issue involving the new party and an existing party which is connected to the matters in dispute in the proceedings, and it is desirable to add the new party so that the court can resolve that issue.
(3) The court may order any person to cease to be a party if it is not desirable for that person to be a party to the proceedings.
(4) The court may order a new party to be substituted for an existing one if –
(a) the existing party’s interest or liability has passed to the new party; and
(b) it is desirable to substitute the new party so that the court can resolve the matters in dispute in the proceedings.

I cant see how it can be desirable to substitute the Claimant when there is an illegality issue, quite simply substitution can be challenged on this head alone.

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

I have has contact from the FCA regarding the Cabot affair and have listed the
various " problems " experienced " with their conduct including the current nonsense and
The 40 days to comply with a CCA request, the refusal of their solicitors to comply with CPR 31.14.
and everything else I can think of.
Jon the Lowell situation was similar to the Cabot reorganisation of the group with the connection
with Interlaken Group and later Freds.
The Register at present does not appear to be up to date.

nem

[Berniethebolt]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

No mention of ceasing to exist!

nem

I clearly misunderstood the post

[mystery1]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

The particulars of the claim i.e. the statement of case. Have they changed at all or is it just the claimant details on the top left that changed ?

M1

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

Have the POCs been amended ?


M1

Yes, CF Europe Ltd.
nem

[nemesis45]

Re: Cabot Financial UK Ltd

When did Lowell Portfolio 1 cease to exist , I thought they were still an entity with a CCL

having said that the FCA clearly stated that they were going to be tough and uphold the regulations

No mention of ceasing to exist!

nem