Smith v lowell & fredrickson international DISCONTINUED

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Bump

[ncf355]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Hi, why the bump?

Didn't see a question?

[Amethyst]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Is the court date good news or bad ? Is it for the hearing of your application to order compliance with your CPR 31.14 request? and have you had any copies of the documents from the claimants yet?


Edit. Ahh yes post #98 " to deal with the defendants application for the claim to be struck out."

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Is the court date good news or bad ? Is it for the hearing of your application to order compliance with your CPR 31.14 request? and have you had any copies of the documents from the claimants yet?


Edit. Ahh yes post #98 " to deal with the defendants application for the claim to be struck out."

hi amethyst its for application to order compliance with your CPR 31.14 request and still not had any thing from claimant s as yet

was looking at particulars and states contract and there solictor in letter i posted states this is a simple contract ?

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

post 109 answerd


and the time its took to come to court and if no documents come forward on 28 april the claim should be struck out or will that be a struggle to get thrown out

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

letter from bryan carter solicitors 22/4/2014

please find attached for information a copy of the notice of discontinuance forwarded to the county court in doncaster

notice of discontinuance of proceedings

take notice that the claimant hereby wholly discontinues this action against the defendant
we certify that we have given notice of discontinuance of proceedings to every defendant against whom the claimant
desires to discontinue
signed bryan carter
advise on this part of letter

at bottom of letter states this
n279 notice of discontinuance of proceedings
or withdrawal of part of claim order 18. rule 1

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

letter from bryan carter solicitors 22/4/2014

please find attached for information a copy of the notice of discontinuance forwarded to the county court in doncaster

notice of discontinuance of proceedings

take notice that the claimant hereby wholly discontinues this action against the defendant
we certify that we have given notice of discontinuance of proceedings to every defendant against whom the claimant
desires to discontinue
signed bryan carter
advise on this part of letter

at bottom of letter states this
n279 notice of discontinuance of proceedings
or withdrawal of part of claim order 18. rule 1

can i know get all crap on credit file removed know

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

letter from bryan carter solicitors 22/4/2014

please find attached for information a copy of the notice of discontinuance forwarded to the county court in doncaster

notice of discontinuance of proceedings

take notice that the claimant hereby wholly discontinues this action against the defendant
we certify that we have given notice of discontinuance of proceedings to every defendant against whom the claimant
desires to discontinue
signed bryan carter
advise on this part of letter

at bottom of letter states this
n279 notice of discontinuance of proceedings
or withdrawal of part of claim order 18. rule 1

letter of discontinuance bottom section not sure about advise please

[ncf355]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Doesnt really matter, they have 'wholly discontinued' so thats an end to their claim

[ncf355]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

I'd be inclined to go for a wasted costs order now, though await Amethyst (and others) input on thatbefore going for it

Theyve embarked on a claim they could not substantiate so they should pay you for your wasted time, printer ink, paperr, postage, application cost, etc

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

I'd be inclined to go for a wasted costs order now, though await Amethyst (and others) input on thatbefore going for it

Theyve embarked on a claim they could not substantiate so they should pay you for your wasted time, printer ink, paperr, postage, application cost, etc

ok how do i go down this rout ill try it need a bit more advise about this way please

[ncf355]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

I think that would require a further application

Did you previous strike oout application have a line for wasted costs in it?

[ncf355]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Certainly worth a try with just a letter:

The Court Manager
X Court
X Town
Etc

X Date

Dear Sir/Madam

Case name and number

I wish to inform the court that the claim as detailed above, in which I am the Defendant, has now been discontinued (I have attached a copy of the Claimant's notice of discontinuance).

However, I believe that the Defendant has behaved unreasonably in their approach to issuing this claim, as clearly he failed to obtain the documentation required to substantiate a claim prior to issuing proceedings.

I would therefore request that the court consider making an order for wasted costs under their case management powers contained within CPR 38.6.

I request the following:

My time to investigate the Claimant's claim and relevant legislation, respond to Claimant and court - 5 hours @ LIP rate £18/hour = £

Printing paper = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Printing ink = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Telephone calls = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Travel time required to post items= £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Fuel = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)


(REMOVE ANY NOT APPLICABLE/ADD ANY OTHERS THAT ARE REASONABLE)

TOTAL = £

I thank the court for it's time and consideration in this matter.

Yours faithfully,


X

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

I think that would require a further application

Did you previous strike oout application have a line for wasted costs in it?

the application was in info was not supplied to have it struck out ill wait for
Amethyst

[smith]

Re: Smith v lowell & fredrickson international

Certainly worth a try with just a letter:

The Court Manager
X Court
X Town
Etc

X Date

Dear Sir/Madam

Case name and number

I wish to inform the court that the claim as detailed above, in which I am the Defendant, has now been discontinued (I have attached a copy of the Claimant's notice of discontinuance).

However, I believe that the Defendant has behaved unreasonably in their approach to issuing this claim, as clearly he failed to obtain the documentation required to substantiate a claim prior to issuing proceedings.

I would therefore request that the court consider making an order for wasted costs under their case management powers contained within CPR 38.6.

I request the following:

My time to investigate the Claimant's claim and relevant legislation, respond to Claimant and court - 5 hours @ LIP rate £18/hour = £

Printing paper = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Printing ink = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Telephone calls = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Travel time required to post items= £ (insert amount reasonably spent)
Fuel = £ (insert amount reasonably spent)


(REMOVE ANY NOT APPLICABLE/ADD ANY OTHERS THAT ARE REASONABLE)

TOTAL = £

I thank the court for it's time and consideration in this matter.

Yours faithfully,


X

was thinking more like having to research the law like a solicitor would