• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

    Reported your post for the attention of Kate
    Any opinions I give are my own. Any advice I give is without liability. If you are unsure, please seek qualified legal advice.

    IF WE HAVE HELPED YOU PLEASE CONSIDER UPGRADING TO VIP - click here

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

      letter today

      we are red debt collection services the debt collection division of lowell financial ltd and we are instructed to collect the money you owe lowell
      we specialise in assessing accounts for litigation and we will be obtaining a copy of your credit file in order to reveiw your financial circumstances and the information within file it will help us determine the best way to recover what you owe
      you can aviod this by calling xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      pay in full
      to arrange an affordable repayment plan
      if you do not repay what you owe you could risk legall action being taken we may decide to apply to the county court for a judgment against you this is know as ccj if we are succesful in obtaining a ccj and you still do not repay depending on the amount you owe and your cirumstances we could then apply to secure the debt against your property or to decuct amounts dircectly from earnings alternatively we may ask a court for a bailiff to remove goods from your house to the value of the debt

      we would obviously prefer to avoid such action and settle this amicably so please call xxxxxxxx

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

        A CCJ is much better than a Stat Demand If it goes to court you can submit your income expenditure and make an offer to pay. HOWEVER, I think the new lot will just need reminding of past events on this same account .....

        ie.


        The deadline for CPR 31.14 expired on 6th July. So as nothing has been received, they have not complied.

        and

        CASE CLOSED FOR NOW
        take notice that the claimant hereby discontinues all
        proceedings under the above numberd action and accordingly withdraws
        from the same
        we certify that a copy of this notice has been served on the defendant


        second letter

        we can confirm that we have been instructed by our client to discontinue the county court claim issued
        against you therefore please find enclosed by way of service you notice of discontinuance
        we trust this is in order



        You might have to go around the houses again with a request for the CCA and other documents but as they couldn't supply them before, there's no reason they would have suddenly appeared just because they are with another DCA.
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

          You really couldnt make it up.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

            Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
            You might have to go around the houses again with a request for the CCA and other documents but as they couldn't supply them before, there's no reason they would have suddenly appeared just because they are with another DCA.
            It's still the same old DCA, our favourite one, where the left hand has no idea what the right hand does.
            Originally posted by smith View Post
            letter today

            we are red debt collection services the debt collection division of lowell financial ltd and we are instructed to collect the money you owe lowell
            we specialise in assessing accounts for litigation and we will be obtaining a copy of your credit file in order to reveiw your financial circumstances and the information within file it will help us determine the best way to recover what you owe
            you can aviod this by calling xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
            pay in full
            to arrange an affordable repayment plan
            if you do not repay what you owe you could risk legall action being taken we may decide to apply to the county court for a judgment against you this is know as ccj if we are succesful in obtaining a ccj and you still do not repay depending on the amount you owe and your cirumstances we could then apply to secure the debt against your property or to decuct amounts dircectly from earnings alternatively we may ask a court for a bailiff to remove goods from your house to the value of the debt

            we would obviously prefer to avoid such action and settle this amicably so please call xxxxxxxx
            Originally posted by ODC View Post
            You really couldnt make it up.
            There was a case a few months ago, where the Lowlifes issued 3 or 4 SD in succession to the same person, a month apart! :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: Can't remember where that thread was...

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

              Originally posted by FlamingParrot View Post
              It's still the same old DCA, our favourite one, where the left hand has no idea what the right hand does.


              There was a case a few months ago, where the Lowlifes issued 3 or 4 SD in succession to the same person, a month apart! :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: Can't remember where that thread was...
              I read it. Im just so amazed these Cupid Stunts are still in business

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                Originally posted by ODC View Post
                I read it. Im just so amazed these Cupid Stunts are still in business

                See you are a Baffty Crastard with your words.:tung:

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                  Yes they really are a Wunch of Bankers

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                    Originally posted by ODC View Post
                    Yes they really are a Wunch of Bankers
                    For want of wetter birds?

                    CAVEAT LECTOR

                    This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                    You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                    Cohen, Herb


                    There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                    gets his brain a-going.
                    Phelps, C. C.


                    "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                    The last words of John Sedgwick

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                      Originally posted by smith View Post
                      unless we receive payment in full or part payment with proposed payment plaN
                      within the next 5 days we will have no alternative but to instruct our solicitor to
                      look to begin legal action against you
                      Utter nonsense - they could just as easily sell the alleged debt elsewhere or just go back to scratching each others' crotch.

                      this could result in us applying for the value of the [debt] to be secured on your property or applying to recover the money you owe by making deductions directly from your earnings along with court costs and interest
                      But only if they won in court, which is by no means certain.

                      alternatively we may arrange for an agent to vist your adress to negotiate settlement
                      Their "agent" would have no more rights to enter one's house than would next door's smelly cat.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                        A standard threatogram...

                        Originally posted by smith View Post
                        if you do not repay what you owe you could risk legall action being taken we may decide to apply to the county court for a judgment against you this is know as ccj if we are succesful in obtaining a ccj and you still do not repay depending on the amount you owe and your cirumstances we could then apply to secure the debt against your property or to decuct amounts dircectly from earnings alternatively we may ask a court for a bailiff to remove goods from your house to the value of the debt

                        If.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                          Originally posted by ODC View Post
                          I read it. Im just so amazed these Cupid Stunts are still in business
                          Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post
                          See you are a Baffty Crastard with your words.:tung:
                          Or that ODC gets wucking mords fuddled?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                            Originally posted by FlamingParrot View Post
                            It's still the same old DCA, our favourite one, where the left hand has no idea what the right hand does.
                            They're both playing with themselves and self-fisting? msl:

                            There was a case a few months ago, where the Lowlifes issued 3 or 4 SD in succession to the same person, a month apart! :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
                            Can't remember where that thread was...
                            Here - link

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                              hi Celestine just got a letter from hamptons legal

                              that red debt collections services have instructed us to pursue you for the overdue ballance
                              on your lowell portfolio 1 limited account

                              you are contractually responsible for repaying the debt unless you send payment to us or
                              red debt collection services immediately we may prepare for more serious action which coul include applying for a county court judgment ccj against you

                              ONCE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEGUN WE MAY BE ABLE TO CLAIM THE MONEY YOU OWE TOGETHER WITH
                              the intrest accured on your overdue account
                              legal cost of recoverying money you owe
                              if we are granted a ccj you could face the following consequences
                              1 ccj against you will be recorded for 6 years
                              2we may apply to enforce the judgment for example by useing bailiffs desuctions from your earnings

                              3 falure to repay your debts may have a impact on your abilty to obtain credit in the future or the terms on which credit is available lenders will look at how you have repaid your debts
                              in the past before they decide to grant you further borrowing

                              IF YOU DO NOT CONTACT US OR ARRANGE PAYMENT WE MAY BEGIN PROCEEDINGS

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                                They don't have any paperwork so a CCA request should see them off. I'll let Kate know, but for now I would prepare and send a standard CCA request.


                                As an idea

                                Dear Sirs,

                                Account or Reference No.:

                                I hereby formally request a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement, pursuant to s.77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA1974).I require you to provide me with a true copy, or reconstituted copy of the credit agreement relating to any account you deem to be mine, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide. I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit (12 + 2 days).

                                If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties. Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b), 6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).​

                                In line with recent OFT Guidance (issued Oct 2010) surrounding Unenforceability, I presume you're aware that the OFT has stipulated that 'sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 outline the information creditors must provide to debtors under fixed-term, running account & Hire Agreements'. This simply means that under these sections a debtor can pay £1 to get:
                                • a copy of their agreement
                                • copies of some of the other documents mentioned in their agreement
                                • a statement of account



                                If this information is not provided within 12 working days the debt becomes unenforceable. This means a creditor cannot:
                                • make the debtor pay the debt before they're supposed to
                                • get a court judgment against the debtor


                                So, in line with the OFT Guidance, and the Consumer Credit Act, please find attached my £1 payment, which is the statutory fee - note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

                                Yours faithfully,
                                #staysafestayhome

                                Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                                Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X