I contacted a company called Kerobo Claims last year who took on a number of claims. The lost their license and then had it reinstated by MOJ. However contacting them has turned into a nightmare and am stuck with what to do - They claimed that the Monument Contract had breaches in - This is going through Cabot who are the most aggressive - quote:
I refer to Kerobo’s letter of 9th June 2010 stating that they had identified breeches in the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulation 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required.Since this document fails to comply with required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3)
consumer Credit Act 1974.
Would these breaches be valid or not?
Hope you can help,
Regards,
Dan
I refer to Kerobo’s letter of 9th June 2010 stating that they had identified breeches in the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulation 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required.Since this document fails to comply with required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3)
consumer Credit Act 1974.
Would these breaches be valid or not?
Hope you can help,
Regards,
Dan
Comment