Re: Kerobo letter to Cabot
Re: the CMC - Kerobo all of sudden seemed to go through a very sticky patch two weeks ago - they had thier MOJ license revoked - but within two days they were reinstated. They have since been incredibly difficult to get hold of saying on their website that they are taking no further claims and they are taking no calls whatsoever - I have sent more emails than you can shake a stick at and over the last ten days have had what sounds as delaying tactics. That is why I came onto this site.
The last thing they sent me was a copy of the original agreement from Lowell for a Capital One CC - Dated 97 and sent by Lowell on the 70/07 - They also sent a copy of their letter sent to me and to Lowell stating that having failed to comply with the s77/8 request in the prescribed time it had fallen into defaul on 07/04 and was now unenforceable.
So this created the confusion - meaning is it game back on and it is now enforceable!!!???
They have sent a copy of the original agreement sent in 27th June 1997 - V2
Then a reconstituted copy of the original agreement and finally a copy of current agreement that must be dated pre. 2004 but has no signature on it - V10
So the question is on the basis of the original and this current agreement and that they supplied outside the required time - do they still have a case against me? or as you mentioned above does s127(3) apply.
Thanks for being understanding,
D
Re: the CMC - Kerobo all of sudden seemed to go through a very sticky patch two weeks ago - they had thier MOJ license revoked - but within two days they were reinstated. They have since been incredibly difficult to get hold of saying on their website that they are taking no further claims and they are taking no calls whatsoever - I have sent more emails than you can shake a stick at and over the last ten days have had what sounds as delaying tactics. That is why I came onto this site.
The last thing they sent me was a copy of the original agreement from Lowell for a Capital One CC - Dated 97 and sent by Lowell on the 70/07 - They also sent a copy of their letter sent to me and to Lowell stating that having failed to comply with the s77/8 request in the prescribed time it had fallen into defaul on 07/04 and was now unenforceable.
So this created the confusion - meaning is it game back on and it is now enforceable!!!???
They have sent a copy of the original agreement sent in 27th June 1997 - V2
Then a reconstituted copy of the original agreement and finally a copy of current agreement that must be dated pre. 2004 but has no signature on it - V10
So the question is on the basis of the original and this current agreement and that they supplied outside the required time - do they still have a case against me? or as you mentioned above does s127(3) apply.
Thanks for being understanding,
D







Comment