Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2011

[Amethyst]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

Well you can easily show they aren't the right terms from the original agreement as MBNA didn't have A&L cards till after you took out the agreement and they have given you MBNA T&Cs...and submitted them in court.....I think a mention of that and a copy of this case summary would be enough to make them seriously look at their case. Shame you have no statements from inception....but talk to PT he'll have a better idea how to demonstrate they arent right and I think this HC judgment does the arguing part for you now. Sounds like Pt's lot bought in the differing T&Cs late n in the day in this case xx

[frisp]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

Thanks Enaid despite all my attempts to persuade Wescot to the light side of the force they stubbornly refuse to leave their dark offices and see whats in front of them :tinysmile_hmm_t2:

[enaid]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

All I have to do now is work out how to get Wescot to withdraw based on this - no pressure then ;0)

Godd Luck frisp I am sure you will ge there

[frisp]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

All I have to do now is work out how to get Wescot to withdraw based on this - no pressure then ;0)

[Amethyst]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

for you, extremely

[frisp]

Re: Phoenix Recoveries v Kotecha Jan 2010

Priceless