• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Even if they did have a valid cause of action, there is still the matter of quantum to be considered.

    If the total of the actual debt, court costs and solicitors' fees had been less than £600, they could not have got the HCEO involved.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    il have to find those figures out
    Thank you. Once it is established whether AW had a right in law to bring a claim or not, we can then start to point you in the right direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
    At the moment, the figures I have highlighted in red I am not interested in. What I am interested in is how much they overcharged you. Also, what is needed is the bare alleged debt. This means the actual debt AW was claiming less any court costs and any alleged solicitor's fees. If the overcharging is equal to the alleged bare debt or more than the alleged debt, in which case AW owes you money, the proceedings were fraudulent ultra vires, ab initio.
    il have to find those figures out

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    these are the costs wriien on wpo:
    judgement debt 989
    judgement costs 165
    execution costs 51.75
    interest to date 1.61
    officers fees 453.50 ( fees will increase by 29p per day whist in posession)
    total levy 1,731.01
    At the moment, the figures I have highlighted in red I am not interested in. What I am interested in is how much they overcharged you. Also, what is needed is the bare alleged debt. This means the actual debt AW was claiming less any court costs and any alleged solicitor's fees. If the overcharging is equal to the alleged bare debt or more than the alleged debt, in which case AW owes you money, the proceedings were fraudulent and ultra vires, ab initio.

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
    Daisychain,

    Could you answer these questions, please -

    1. How much did AW claim you owed them?
    2. How much did they overcharge?
    3. How much were they owed or owed you after deducting any overcharging from their alleged claim?

    This should give a better idea of just how lawful AW's actions were and are.
    these are the costs wriien on wpo:
    judgement debt 989
    judgement costs 165
    execution costs 51.75
    interest to date 1.61
    officers fees 453.50 ( fees will increase by 29p per day whist in posession)
    total levy 1,731.01

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Daisychain,

    Could you answer these questions, please -

    1. How much did AW claim you owed them?
    2. How much did they overcharge?
    3. How much were they owed or owed you after deducting any overcharging from their alleged claim?

    This should give a better idea of just how lawful AW's actions were and are.

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
    Also, Anglian Water's application to the court for and grant of a CCJ should be challenged on the grounds of its veracity and the fact that they had been overcharging and there is a likelihood they were not owed the sum of money they were claiming, or were not owed any money at all, or owed the OP money. It would also bring into question the involvement of Marstons and obtaining of the High Court writ.
    exactly. this is why im so angry. anglian water confirmed the sent ccj papers to me but i definatly didnt recieve them so i havnt been able to defend my self in courtpersonally. also this has come at a time when i have alot of pressure on me (personal things going on in my life) and this has caused a huge amount of stress on me unduly to the point ive hardly slept since they came. also is there a set smount of time that i have to get this set aside? they came and siezed on 14/2/14
    Last edited by daisychain; 23rd February 2014, 12:41:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluebottle
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Also, Anglian Water's application to the court for and grant of a CCJ should be challenged on the grounds of its veracity and the fact that they had been overcharging and there is a likelihood they were not owed the sum of money they were claiming, or were not owed any money at all, or owed the OP money. It would also bring into question the involvement of Marstons and obtaining of the High Court writ.

    Leave a comment:


  • bizzybob
    replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    clock is a 2.99 jobby from b&m. sofas are all material and my tele is a standard 42 inch hd fltscreen. im classed a vunrable household as i am a single parent to3 children ( which one is disabled) and i am on benefits. also the waterbill was so high because anglian water were over charging me and i wanted them to investigate which they refused .
    Which is why you complain to OFWAT, your MP, and the CEO of anglian, regarding their appointed agents Marstons enforcement tactics and UNLAWFUL Global Levy

    Leave a comment:


  • bizzybob
    replied
    Re: global levy on a vunrable household marstons

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    also if the stay of execution is granted does that mean my goods are no longer levied?
    It takes the HCEO out of the equation, as to the levy, it is invalid due to being global, and you can use that as part of your complaint to OFWAT, Anglian and your MP.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    sofas are all material
    Unless they still have their fire safety tags attached, they may not lawfully be sold or auctioned in the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: global levy on a vunrable household marstons

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    brilliant. i will do this starting tomorrow. thank u for your advice
    also if the stay of execution is granted does that mean my goods are no longer levied?

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: global levy on a vunrable household marstons

    Originally posted by bizzybob View Post
    You could go to your local county court, or go online at a local library, You need to challenge the £120 as it is unaffordable top you, you MUST contact the welfare department at anglian and involve your MP.
    brilliant. i will do this starting tomorrow. thank u for your advice

    Leave a comment:


  • bizzybob
    replied
    Re: global levy on a vunrable household marstons

    Originally posted by daisychain View Post
    also marstons have arranged me to pay 120 per month. im also wondering if i signed under duress- i was running late getting my child to school and she knew this.if she had come back later i probably would have more time to read through everything.
    You could go to your local county court, or go online at a local library, You need to challenge the £120 as it is unaffordable top you, you MUST contact the welfare department at anglian and involve your MP.

    Leave a comment:


  • daisychain
    replied
    Re: global levy on a vunrable household marstons

    also marstons have arranged me to pay 120 per month. im also wondering if i signed under duress- i was running late getting my child to school and she knew this.if she had come back later i probably would have more time to read through everything.

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X