HCEO fees and actions

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

[QUOTE=CleverClogs;394998]Not lawfully, as your limited company is a separate legal entity from you and/or your OH. Good, that's what I thought

Who owns your present home? It's rented

Who was sued by the ba:censored:rds at Robinsons? My OH in his name

Did you tell the Stockport Express about your problems?[/QUOTE No, I'm not one for causing a scene :santa2:

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

Was it, by God?

I must say I've heard some nasty things about those users of the Tin Brook, but never quite as bad as this.


Perhaps they'd overindulged on Old Tom? :grin:

They could have indulged in whatever 'brew' they wanted to, they were all crap

[CleverClogs]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

Old Tom "barley wine" is, if I recall correctly, their strongest.

I've never tried the stuff, mind; the rest are the usual (as weak as horse piddle) Eurofizz if brewery conditioned and just less gassy if not.

[ploddertom]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

There is anotherway of looking at this. Having not gained entry and not having seized goods externally suggests the Enforcement Officer has not executed the Writ. All he has done is to make the debtor pay in small amounts which are done electronically. The work done is very minimal and to keep making repeated visits is only done to garner further fees. If he is upset over the level of payment then he should never have agreed to it in the first place.

[CleverClogs]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

Who owns your present home?

It's rented

OK...

Who was sued by the ba:censored:rds at Robinsons?

My OH in his name

Good...

Does your OH have any assets or savings?

Who owns your limited company?

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

OK...

Good...

Does your OH have any assets or savings? No, neither of us do.

Who owns your limited company?

s We are both equal shareholders and directors.

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

There is anotherway of looking at this. Having not gained entry and not having seized goods externally suggests the Enforcement Officer has not executed the Writ. All he has done is to make the debtor pay in small amounts which are done electronically. The work done is very minimal and to keep making repeated visits is only done to garner further fees. If he is upset over the level of payment then he should never have agreed to it in the first place.

We agreed the £20/mth with the first collector in a different part of the country (have since moved), they say the reason they want the payments increased is that we aren't even paying off the interest. There is a HC writ. I think we've just been fairly clever in our handling of them, they know that we know our rights

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

There is anotherway of looking at this. Having not gained entry and not having seized goods externally suggests the Enforcement Officer has not executed the Writ. All he has done is to make the debtor pay in small amounts which are done electronically. The work done is very minimal and to keep making repeated visits is only done to garner further fees. If he is upset over the level of payment then he should never have agreed to it in the first place.

My OH says that when they first came to our new address they said the reason was because they had issued a new Writ and wanted to increase the payments. Is there another action that makes it 'executed'?

[CleverClogs]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

s We are both equal shareholders and directors.

The reason I asked was to explore the possibility of your OH declaring himself bankrupt; whilst that might release him from this onerous debt (and, hopefully, leave the creditor with next to bugger all) there would be serious consequences.

[Burnybum]

Re: HCEO fees and actions

The reason I asked was to explore the possibility of your OH declaring himself bankrupt; whilst that might release him from this onerous debt (and, hopefully, leave the creditor with next to bugger all) there would be serious consequences.

No that's not really an option as in our business people search you out, hence why we paid our debts The debt isn't the issue, THE FEES ARE We have no wish to fight the debt or go bankrupt, it's JUST THE FEES I have an issue with if you guys can help us