Re: Paid PCN, repeat notices, multiple refs, no breakdown and harassment
In all honesty, BB, Harassment, as defined by the PfHA, would not be appropriate, in the OP's case, unless JBW or their bailiffs continued with enforcement, regardless, and failed to desist in the face of the local authority telling them the warrant had been negated and the OP had served them with a Notice to Cease and Desist, although, such a notice is not always necessary. Demanding fees not permitted by applicable legislation or for work not carried out, quite simply, is Fraud. If the demands are accompanied by threats, then it escalates to the more serious offence of Blackmail. It has become clearly evident that certificated bailiffs, even those of limited intellectual ability, believe they are untouchable and above the law and can do whatever they like without fear of recourse. Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles' recent statement is an encouraging sign that the politicians are beginning to take the problems of bully-boy/girl bailiffs seriously. Let's just hope they go further and clamp down on the abuses that blight the lives of those who are, all too often, on the receiving end of bailiffs' malpractices, not to mention leave creditors in no doubt of the liability they hold for the actions of their contracted enforcement agents. Where CT arrears are involved it is those who pay CT who need to call their elected representatives to account for the actions of bailiffs engaged, in their name, to collect arrears. There also needs to be greater accountability of local government officers who are clearly not doing anything to ensure the law is being observed or that when the line is crossed, sanctions are imposed on the bailiff company, including cancellation of its contract.
Originally posted by bizzybob
View Post
Comment