Originally posted by bluebottle
View Post
Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Guest repliedRe: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
I don't and I'm sure that he wasn't, but it was Clapham Common where buggery is not unknown.
- 2 likes
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
How do you know that Ron Davies was doing unspeakable things to badgers, Cloggy?:grin:Originally posted by CleverClogs View PostIFYPFY !
msl:
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
IFYPFY !Originally posted by bizzybob View PostAnd Ron Davies was buggering badgers, allegedly...
msl:
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
If you use anti-harassment laws, Charity, you have to select the most appropriate Act as your best weapon. The Public Order Act 1986 requires proof beyond all reasonable doubt, but Section 3, PfHA 1997 (as amended) is a civil remedy provision and is on balance of probability which, as you know, is a lesser burden. It also places the onus probandi on the person(s) whose conduct is in question as to whether they are acting lawfully or reasonably. You have, of course, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 as another stick with which to beat those who abuse covert surveillance powers. The Human Rights Act is another as Excel who, in all probability, fall under its ambit as they are carrying out functions of local government on PCC's behalf and any private-sector company doing so is subject to the Act whether they like it or not.Originally posted by charitynjw View PostThe usual problem is getting proof beyond reasonable doubt.
"Yer Honour, see, I'm a 'twitcher', & I was just trying to get a 'photo' of the greater-spotted Detterbird, a very reclusive specimen............honest!"

- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
This is worth a read
http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/ho...estigator.html
http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/ho...html#more-5536
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
In this case there is a written record, somewhere of his reasons for taking photos when i reported his registration to the police. I've still not heard back from plod as to what he did say he was doing. From where he was he can see nothing but my oil tank and house - not even a view of the miles of fields behind! I'm sure that would have been the day I had my Van to Remove fee had i not reported him. It would be a coincidence that a council appointed bailiff, who has been to my address before should suddenly have any other reason for taking pics of my house. I guess his camera has since suffered a fault so the images no longer exist, although if one could find the original SD card it can be recovered, and his camera data will show the date etc of images. He could argue that the date was set to the wrong date, in which case any evidence he may produce that requires photos would be invalid, and rather nicely this incident clearly demonstrates that bailiffs do take photos of property without ever getting out of thier car, as such cannot use a photo as proof of an official visit.
Any ideas how I can get plod to reply to their email sent from 101 to the officer involved? I did consider a DPA but why should I pay for something i'm already entitled to for free?!
I've just finished a night shift and so i'm waffling...sorry...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
And Ron Davies was bothering badgers, allegedly...Originally posted by charitynjw View PostThe usual problem is getting proof beyond reasonable doubt.
"Yer Honour, see, I'm a 'twitcher', & I was just trying to get a 'photo' of the greater-spotted Detterbird, a very reclusive specimen............honest!"

- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
Originally posted by bluebottle View PostWhat you have highlighted could amount to Harassment, as per PfHA 1997 (as amended) or Causing Intentional Alarm, Distress or Harassment, as per the Public Order Act 1986. PCC are going to have to explain what Excel bailiffs were doing taking photographs of your home. If they don't, then I can see this matter landing in the LGO's In tray.The usual problem is getting proof beyond reasonable doubt.Originally posted by bizzybob View PostHasn't this very behaviour by Local Authorities and private organisations, as in spying on people, just become a very hot potato. May be worth a FOI into the use of covert surveillance by PCC on residents with council tax arrears
"Yer Honour, see, I'm a 'twitcher', & I was just trying to get a 'photo' of the greater-spotted Detterbird, a very reclusive specimen............honest!"
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
Hasn't this very behaviour by Local Authorities and private organisations, as in spying on people, just become a very hot potato. May be worth a FOI into the use of covert surveillance by PCC on residents with council tax arrears
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
What you have highlighted could amount to Harassment, as per PfHA 1997 (as amended) or Causing Intentional Alarm, Distress or Harassment, as per the Public Order Act 1986. PCC are going to have to explain what Excel bailiffs were doing taking photographs of your home. If they don't, then I can see this matter landing in the LGO's In tray.Originally posted by Rob0000 View PostI was just thinking...yes there is a burning smell...about Post 80. Do I not have the right to a private and family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights). Would taking photographs of my family home, for no CT enforcement reason be a breach of my right to a private and family life? Additionally, why is that the police would need to check their observations of me were in line with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers act (2000), but Excel Thugs don't - even thought they are employed and requested to undertake covert observations of me by Pembrokeshire County Council?
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
I was just thinking...yes there is a burning smell...about Post 80. Do I not have the right to a private and family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights). Would taking photographs of my family home, for no CT enforcement reason be a breach of my right to a private and family life? Additionally, why is that the police would need to check their observations of me were in line with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers act (2000), but Excel Thugs don't - even thought they are employed and requested to undertake covert observations of me by Pembrokeshire County Council?
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
In post 80 he was in a VW Golf, the second time they were in a 4x4 BMW...not sure if it can take 500ltrs of oil!!
Originally posted by bizzybob View PostGood advice from CC, the Welsh Family must be one that are from Barry with ancestry in Beijing and Rhondda Cynon Taff, we did multicultural in Wales before the name existed. One thought is I woner relating to the post #80, was the Excel bailiff thinking of levying the heating oil, and removing it for sale? If such a thing is allowed. Would a bailiff be allowed to levy and remove heating oil and coal , notwithstanding he would need a tanker to remove the oil at an extortionate van fee?
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
The T5 transporter and the Sprinter sized Crafter are good vans, the T5 is cramped in the cab like a Vivaro, compared to the Sprinter, so three burly bailiffs would be like a sardines in the T5, Vivaro or VitoOriginally posted by bluebottle View PostI've heard that about the MB Vito from a number of people. The VW T5, on the other hand, is a lot more reliable. A coachbuilding firm, based in North Yorkshire, have based a bus on it and TfL use it for their Dial-A-Ride service, which says something about the T5's quality and reliability.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
I've heard that about the MB Vito from a number of people. The VW T5, on the other hand, is a lot more reliable. A coachbuilding firm, based in North Yorkshire, have based a bus on it and TfL use it for their Dial-A-Ride service, which says something about the T5's quality and reliability.Originally posted by bizzybob View PostWoudln't have either of those vehicles expensive cramped cab.....Vito is unreliable, bailiff would need loadsa fees to pay for the spares.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Excel Civil Enforcement - thugs
Woudln't have either of those vehicles expensive cramped cab.....Vito is unreliable, bailiff would need loadsa fees to pay for the spares.Originally posted by CleverClogs View PostIf one considers their excessive charges, one might conclude they can afford them!
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: