• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Penalty Charges Newsletter

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Penalty Charges Newsletter

    Dear Member

    In this month news letter we have the following articles.

    1. OFT (what are they doing)
    2. FSA (the Wavier)
    3. Running Total Updated
    4. Great success on Consumer Credit Agreements
    5. General consumer section Updates
    6. Legal Proceedings issued against PAYPAL
    7. Site developments



    1. THE OFT

    The OFT has been battling it out in the courts for number months now, we are still waiting on the Judge’s decision on the Banks old terms and conditions.

    It was originally thought that his judgement would be made in July 2008. We don’t know if the delay has been caused by the complexity of the issues and or the amount of documentation that the Judge has to consider, maybe his other commitments have delayed matters. Either way as soon a we hear the information it will be posted in The Test Case Forum section.

    Since July the OFT has issued a number of Question and Answer guides for consumers, we would like your feedback on these as consumers. Do you find them helpful up to date or lacking? We want to hear from you.

    The OFT has also issued as Personal current accounts market study we have a full copy on the forum and we would like member feedback and suggestion we will then be submitting this to the OFT. A copy of the Consultation paper can be found at the following link http://www.penaltychargesforum.co.uk...ad.php?t=47224

    We at penalty charges did not attended a recent meeting with the OFT however we are glad that a least one site attend. (Maybe the OFT was worried about inviting PC being the founding site behind the bank charges campaign. We note that Which and the CAB were also invited to a meeting with the OFT.

    Penalty Charges has already attended two Meetings with the OFT one many years ago when Stephen Hone Organised the first protest outside the OFT to try and compel the OFT to take the legal action it is now doing. Penalty Charges found both meetings to be very uneventful as the OFT kept hiding behind Acts, and would never commit to or disclose anything.

    Even today the OFT have not disclosed information requested under the freedom of information Act. A point that one of our members has now taken to the Information commissioner. We submit simple question were asked of the OFT but to date most if not all have been avoided, be answered at all or to our satisfaction. (what has the OFT to got to hide we ask)

    Penalty charges will be writing to the OFT as we want to encourage the OFT to apply some pressure in respect of the Wavers that are still enforce, and if needed then the OFT should make an application to the court that the continued granting of these waivers must stop or banks must be stopped from charging too.


    2. FSA (The Wavier)

    Penalty Charges is considering organizing a large protest outside the FSA office at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS. Just before Xmas (date to be confirmed) we would like to encourage as many members as possible to spare a little time and join us in a united stance against the FSA waivers. (we say Protect the consumer first) If you interested please let us know at on the following link ( if you another consumer site and like to join us please let us know)
    http://www.penaltychargesforum.co.uk...ad.php?t=47143


    The protest will be on two points firstly that the Waivers should stop or the banks should be stopped from applying charges to consumers. Consumers are already struggling and yet the banks keep applying these charges. Unlike the banks, the consumers don’t get bailed out by the government.

    We would also like to see the FSA stop the banks paying themselves huge bonus when they had to borrow (given) tax payers money due to their errors, clearly the taxpayers money used to bail the banks should be a last resort. And the bonus should be the first resort or was the tax payer money used to pay these bonus, a question members should write and ask there local MP. Either way consumers should not be paying for the banks errors whilst the banks pay the chief executives million pound bonuses.

    For now the waivers are in place until January 2009 see this link
    http://www.penaltychargesforum.co.uk...ad.php?t=47183


    3. Running Total updated

    We would like to apologise for the delay in adding an over 600,000 thousand to the running total this was caused because by a technical glitch. We have now solved his problem and the total is up to date once again.

    4. Great success on Consumer Credit Agreements

    One of our members who was being hounded by a debt collection company for the last year, he had event been threatened with a statutory demand, well he has now had over £7,500.00 wiped, as the bank failed to supply the credit agreement and or show that they had any legal grounds on which to pursue the alleged debt.

    Full advice of this is available on the forum
    http://www.penaltychargesforum.co.uk...play.php?f=392

    We asked the Debt collectors why that had not checked that they has the legal grounds to chase the debt before they started, clearly chasing and unenforceable debt is wrong. One response they provided was; well they said it was owed. We submit that this leaves debt collectors open to chase debts that are not even real and potentially open to abuse. (Think of the elderly and the vulnerable faced with a letter say you could face losing you home if you do not pay) must would just pay out of fear, even though the debt might not be owed or be enforceable.

    Penalty charges will be writing to the FSA and OFT and local MP’s to call for tighter controls on debt collcting companies.


    5 General consumer news.

    Penalty charges has a huge General Consumer forum which covers most if not all areas of Consumer law, we even have a fantastic Traffic Offences forum which run mainly run by our very Traffic Watchdog “sammyferre” Thanks Sammyferre.

    Come check it out,

    As was mentioned above our excellent consumer law section, covers everything from private contracts to tenancy disputes, through to misrepresentation through how to deal with a DCA in a firm manner! - If you have a problem or just want to learn your rights then please have a look, there are many sources of information that one can browse at one's leisure!!

    If that’s not enough law, then feel free to track the case of Hone v PayPal. Our boss is taking PayPal to court for various reasons including PayPal meddling in a contract between the buyer and seller!

    6. PAYPAL

    Court Proceedings have now been issued against PAYPAL an (eBay company)
    We have seen a number of complaints against PayPal just refunded buyer money when there has been a contractual dispute between the buyer and selling. We have asked the court to make a declaration that in contractual disputes between the two parties (buyer and selling) that PayPal has no legal standing to intervene by refunding the buyer money, clearly is there is a contractual dispute the only person who has the power to order a refunded or make an award of money is a Judge at a Court of Law.

    7. BIG NEWS

    On the 1st October Penalty charges will be launching its sister site which we hope will be used by millions of consumers and businesses from around the world. The site will be launched on the 1st October but the doors won't open until the 15th October 2008.

    Finally we like to say a big thank you for all the donations received, with these donations the sites can keep growing and offer help and advice for free. Please if you would like to donate click on the donation link on the site here https://www.paypal.com/uk/cgi-bin/we...2285e4178e91a4
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

  • #2
    Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

    Even today the OFT have not disclosed information requested under the freedom of information Act. A point that one of our members has now taken to the Information commissioner. We submit simple question were asked of the OFT but to date most if not all have been avoided, be answered at all or to our satisfaction. (what has the OFT to got to hide we ask)


    :rolleyes: He wasn't even there! And the grammar!!!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

      There's an irony in that lot.

      PC's boss (Hone) is taking Paypal to court. Court proceedings have been issued against Paypal.

      But if you would like to donate money to PC, then please click the link which takes you to .... Paypal !!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

        Originally posted by Jester View Post
        There's an irony in that lot.

        PC's boss (Hone) is taking Paypal to court. Court proceedings have been issued against Paypal.

        But if you would like to donate money to PC, then please click the link which takes you to .... Paypal !!
        I hope he's made alternate arrangements for his donations......paypal will pull that facility and probably take ages to give him any money in the account.
        I heard that Stephen was dyslexic (not sure if this is true or not, given the scale of inter site rumours), and can sympathise, but why oh why doesn't he get someone to check before he sends the e-mails out.:cry:

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

          Some might not like the guy but does everyone understand what he means? I assume they do & if so then his emails, however couched, are enough to express their meaning

          We have much more important fish to fry

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

            Originally posted by Emerald View Post
            I heard that Stephen was dyslexic (not sure if this is true or not, given the scale of inter site rumours), and can sympathise, but why oh why doesn't he get someone to check before he sends the e-mails out.:cry:
            I so agree, Emerald. Why send an e-mail to thousands of people when it's so grammatically incorrect?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

              reason it was sent out was, I was in a hurry, I am finishing my law degree run a company were everything has to be double checked, because yes i am dyslexic so spelling has to be perfect. oh and i have a family that do need some of my time

              so your lucky i even had time to send the letter! lol

              Just to clear a point up, so you know, i had asked someone to spell check the article and they informed me that had. so i did not recheck it!

              Now i am sorry if my letter upset you for a few grammatical errors, but your some comments were fare more rude and thoughtless than my letter was.

              My letter was sent out to help and advice people, can you say the same about your comments.

              a lot of people thanked me for just taking the time to sit and write it! now they are true gents and ladies,

              Rant over

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                I'm sorry you got stitched up by your spelling and grammar checker! Do feel free to PM any future draft newsletters to me - I'd love to check them for you.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                  what is the problem......so what if there is some grammatical (must be the posh word for spelling)............... i really do not understand people who constantly have a pop at others who obviously have a disability/disadvantage and who are right at the forefront of this campaign against the bank.
                  Do you guys really know what a achievement it is that Stephen or plain old Mr Hone has done to make it into the 3rd year of his studies in Law. well i do and i have a mountainous respect for him in achieving this, and to say he was one of the first to stand up and put the POC's out publicly so all the rest of us could claim from the banks. But naw Stephen it's about grammatical errors.
                  As for the Jibe about Ebay, they do have another donation facility for postal orders and cheques, however without giving bank details out in public there are very limited way's to recieve funding over the net. Do you not agree it's time that Paypal got it's comeuppance???? because i do.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                    I agree poltie It's always been my understanding that to remark on someones grammar is very bad manners. There are occasions when some who look on the web for advice may lack an education or as is the case with Stephen suffer from dyslexia.

                    To continually make such derogatory remarks must put such people off from asking for help which is rather ironic as all to often they are the ones who need help most
                    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                    PS Paypal are an appaling bunch of ******s
                    Last edited by righty; 29th October 2008, 15:22:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                      Agreed completely.

                      I do however think that in public announcments, emails etc that represent a site it should get checked over first. i know i've made some clangers in the past, and we had a bit of a row on here cause i spelt something wrong in a letter to lloyds, and errors in the old CAG newsletters used to get well attacked.

                      Most of Stephens users do know him and just ignore the odd error, and he did get this checked over first. Anyway he gets many more newsletters out than we manage to - think we managed one so far lol.
                      #staysafestayhome

                      Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                      Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                        OK the AME may I suggest a complete ban on criticizing another persons grammar. When it happens even in jest I find it somewhat childless & feel it detracts from the mission.

                        Incidentally just sent this to legal 1@1

                        Sir you are a disgrace

                        Attempts by you to quell the consumer uprising by the use of spurious accusations of illegality will not go unheeded.

                        The struggle against the avarice of the money lenders & the often appalling conduct of their agents will not succeed

                        What has happened to PC has simply had the effect of bringing the community closer together and has not in fact had the effect you may have wished for something which must be of great disappointment to you

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                          think we having an amnesty on spelling at the mo....i think the points been made well enough for peeps to pick up on it.

                          I don't know what avarice means but otherwise well done. i don't think 1&1 were the instigators of everything, they will have been threatened with action (I would guess) and hosting companies will tend to just pull the plug. Really they should have investigated first before going off half cock and ordering Paperhat to pull the plug on PC. I think thats more where the failing lies.
                          #staysafestayhome

                          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                            an aminasty on speeeling 'o' goood
                            ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                            Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                            think we having an amnesty on spelling at the mo....i think the points been made well enough for peeps to pick up on it.

                            I don't know what avarice means but otherwise well done. i don't think 1&1 were the instigators of everything, they will have been threatened with action (I would guess) and hosting companies will tend to just pull the plug. Really they should have investigated first before going off half cock and ordering Paperhat to pull the plug on PC. I think thats more where the failing lies.

                            There you go definition of avarice
                            extreme greed for wealth Latin avere to crave
                            ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                            I know AME but they have to understand that there may be a price to pay for knuckling under to such pressure & perhaps next time they may not be so quick to act.

                            IMHO what a read did not amount to advising illegal conduct & therefore the threat was empty as it would not have stood up under scrutiny
                            Last edited by righty; 29th October 2008, 16:33:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Penalty Charges Newsletter

                              Oh yes I agree, there was nothing at all wrong it what was posted.

                              I feel sad for weemonk, seems he's got in poop at work over it all due to some petty minded colleague.

                              I guess it reminds us to be careful just how much info we make public.
                              #staysafestayhome

                              Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                              Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X