Ok here we go.... my first thread.
Where to begin ay, ermmm ok from the start.
My daughter was born in 2004 and at the time I was still with the mother. Unfortunately we seperated two and a half years later. Initially she allowed me to see my child as often as I liked which was brilliant. Then unfortunately when she realised there was no way we would get back together (6 months later) she started to halt contact.
Every time i mentioned court ect she amazingly allowed contact up until 3 years agom where she said if i went through court she would accuse me of being everything under the sun. Not letting this phase me i instructed a solicitor and this is where it really began.
Initially she one upped me and i got a letter from her solicitor advising that I could see my child in a contact centre. I happily agreed to this as i really didnt care where it was i just wanted to see my kid. 3 months later I get a notification that she has refused to attend the contact centre.
The next step was mediation (were now at about 6 months). I attended, got spoke to like crap for two hours and then a month later got a letter from them advising me that she had refused to attend mediation.
So after this we had to make an application to court. I had to wait 5 months for the first hearing. First hearing commences and as you would expect Cafcass brought in to meet child, indirect contact by way of letters awarded (i have sent one weeky even up to the present).
Months later I get a call and attend Cafcass. They tell me that my ex has accused me of being an alcoholic (i dont drink at all) drug addict (think not) violent (im 5 ft 6 and weigh as much as a bag of sugar) and that police had detailed files about a number of crimes i had commited (yeah right). On this basis interim contact was advised against and at the next hearing we gained an adjourment following police safeguarding checks.
Suprise suprise safeguarding checks come back clear with not a single blip. My employer intervenes to explain that my job is supporting people who drink and do drugs and happily passed on my random fluid test results (which have always been clear for many years). So over the further delays I disproved all comments made.
Moving forward indirect contact was increased to include phonecalls, 4 months later she hadnt answered a single call and out of the blue I get a solicitors letter advising me she would be staying in hspital for the duration of a pregnancy (3 more months) and i had to cease contact. To my suprise several photographs emerged proving she was in fact not in hospital at all bu Cafcass chose to ignore this information.
So back to court we go and yet another adjournment so phonecall contact can be reattempted. 3 months later she starts to answer calls and i begin speaking to my daughter which was great. I continued sending letters also.
So with progress made we returned to court and I was awarded 2 contact sessions at Cafcass. First session didnt go to well my daughter was scared of the Cafcass officer and refused to go into the office so i ended up speaking to her on the phone for an hour and a half. Second session went brilliantly and the Cafcass report reflected this.
Ok so back to court again. 6 supervised contact sessions awarded (November 2011). Lets put it this way, that was six months ago and i have only had 3 sessions. every other session has been cancelled with really trivial excuses. I was back in court today and the court have adjourned for an additional 3 months. What did concern we was the statement "6 months for 3 sessions is awful but with this trend i had better allow sufficient time for the remaining 3 sessions to take place".
Additional details to consider:
I have never had a response to any letters i have sent.
Cafcass has proposed my ex takes my daughter to CAHMS before it becomes court ordered.
All false claims made about me have been disproven and i have documentary proof of this.
Telephone calls (indirect contact) have not been answered for the past 5 months.
there are no single derogatory remarks made on a cafcass report from me about the childs mother.
My daughter has responded well to calls and contact and has expressed the desire to progress further.
So there you go. My story.
My main concern is that the "resident parent" is obstructing every court order made and has caused some very serious delays. Is she free to do this or will they actually at some point call her on these blatant attempts to drag the process out?
Any advice is appreciated.
Many Thanks
Where to begin ay, ermmm ok from the start.
My daughter was born in 2004 and at the time I was still with the mother. Unfortunately we seperated two and a half years later. Initially she allowed me to see my child as often as I liked which was brilliant. Then unfortunately when she realised there was no way we would get back together (6 months later) she started to halt contact.
Every time i mentioned court ect she amazingly allowed contact up until 3 years agom where she said if i went through court she would accuse me of being everything under the sun. Not letting this phase me i instructed a solicitor and this is where it really began.
Initially she one upped me and i got a letter from her solicitor advising that I could see my child in a contact centre. I happily agreed to this as i really didnt care where it was i just wanted to see my kid. 3 months later I get a notification that she has refused to attend the contact centre.
The next step was mediation (were now at about 6 months). I attended, got spoke to like crap for two hours and then a month later got a letter from them advising me that she had refused to attend mediation.
So after this we had to make an application to court. I had to wait 5 months for the first hearing. First hearing commences and as you would expect Cafcass brought in to meet child, indirect contact by way of letters awarded (i have sent one weeky even up to the present).
Months later I get a call and attend Cafcass. They tell me that my ex has accused me of being an alcoholic (i dont drink at all) drug addict (think not) violent (im 5 ft 6 and weigh as much as a bag of sugar) and that police had detailed files about a number of crimes i had commited (yeah right). On this basis interim contact was advised against and at the next hearing we gained an adjourment following police safeguarding checks.
Suprise suprise safeguarding checks come back clear with not a single blip. My employer intervenes to explain that my job is supporting people who drink and do drugs and happily passed on my random fluid test results (which have always been clear for many years). So over the further delays I disproved all comments made.
Moving forward indirect contact was increased to include phonecalls, 4 months later she hadnt answered a single call and out of the blue I get a solicitors letter advising me she would be staying in hspital for the duration of a pregnancy (3 more months) and i had to cease contact. To my suprise several photographs emerged proving she was in fact not in hospital at all bu Cafcass chose to ignore this information.
So back to court we go and yet another adjournment so phonecall contact can be reattempted. 3 months later she starts to answer calls and i begin speaking to my daughter which was great. I continued sending letters also.
So with progress made we returned to court and I was awarded 2 contact sessions at Cafcass. First session didnt go to well my daughter was scared of the Cafcass officer and refused to go into the office so i ended up speaking to her on the phone for an hour and a half. Second session went brilliantly and the Cafcass report reflected this.
Ok so back to court again. 6 supervised contact sessions awarded (November 2011). Lets put it this way, that was six months ago and i have only had 3 sessions. every other session has been cancelled with really trivial excuses. I was back in court today and the court have adjourned for an additional 3 months. What did concern we was the statement "6 months for 3 sessions is awful but with this trend i had better allow sufficient time for the remaining 3 sessions to take place".
Additional details to consider:
I have never had a response to any letters i have sent.
Cafcass has proposed my ex takes my daughter to CAHMS before it becomes court ordered.
All false claims made about me have been disproven and i have documentary proof of this.
Telephone calls (indirect contact) have not been answered for the past 5 months.
there are no single derogatory remarks made on a cafcass report from me about the childs mother.
My daughter has responded well to calls and contact and has expressed the desire to progress further.
So there you go. My story.
My main concern is that the "resident parent" is obstructing every court order made and has caused some very serious delays. Is she free to do this or will they actually at some point call her on these blatant attempts to drag the process out?
Any advice is appreciated.
Many Thanks
Comment