** Lost ** Moriarty Law/MMF v lb1989
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
- 1 thank
-
Okay it seems like the best thing to do. How do I go about submitting that application then? Do I send a cheque, and is it form N244? I had a look at it yesterday but not sure how to fill it in? Any help is much appreciated, thanks!Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
Sorry to sound harsh here but £100 now, vs losing in court, having judgment and costs is in my book a no brainer. The Court has made an order on application of the claimant that it cannot really make, it must be set aside, and i think you wouold have a good shout at getting your costs back on the application too.
That order needs to go, you ought to have your say as to why the Claim shouldnt be reinstated and your right to reply etc
Comment
-
well you would need an N244, you would need to supply that N244 with a cheque, and it would need to set out the grounds on which the order was defective etc, it is fairly straight forward so shouldnt be overly problematic to complete the N244Originally posted by lb1989 View Post
Okay it seems like the best thing to do. How do I go about submitting that application then? Do I send a cheque, and is it form N244? I had a look at it yesterday but not sure how to fill it in? Any help is much appreciated, thanks!I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
Comment
-
#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
Yeah for you ... it'll take me a day to figure out why the court shouldn't have made the order without notice as the claim was struck for non payment of hearing fee and presumably they argued admin error or court error on it ....Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
well you would need an N244, you would need to supply that N244 with a cheque, and it would need to set out the grounds on which the order was defective etc, it is fairly straight forward so shouldnt be overly problematic to complete the N244#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
Whats order are you asking the court to make and why? - "The applicant seeks an order to set aside the Claimant's application dated 15/1/19." What should I put as the why?Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
well you would need an N244, you would need to supply that N244 with a cheque, and it would need to set out the grounds on which the order was defective etc, it is fairly straight forward so shouldnt be overly problematic to complete the N244
Thanks - got the form up now. For the question "have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for?" Do I select No, or do I need to provide a draft order?
I guess I should select "without a hearing" as how I want it to be heard, and then I've put in the date and time of the hearing due in May in question 7. I've said District Judge for question 8 (just based on reading the letter I received on Tuesday).
Re: "Who should be served with this application", would I need to say Claimant/Claimant's Solicitor, or can I do the same and do it without notice to them?
Question 10 - what information will I rely on. Should I resubmit the WS *and* set out evidence in the form?
Sorry for all the questions!
Comment
-
Just for ref.
Relief from sanctions
3.9
(1) On an application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order, the court will consider all the circumstances of the case, so as to enable it to deal justly with the application, including the need –
(a) for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost; and
(b) to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.
(2) An application for relief must be supported by evidence.
Back to top General power of the court to rectify matters where there has been an error of procedure
3.10 Where there has been an error of procedure such as a failure to comply with a rule or practice direction –
(a) the error does not invalidate any step taken in the proceedings unless the court so orders; and
(b) the court may make an order to remedy the error.#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
Reading 23.9 it statesWith that in mind, I've got the following in my N244:(3) The order must contain a statement of the right to make an application to set aside or vary the order under rule 23.10.
Doesn't quite sound right though?The applicant seeks an order to set aside the Claimant's application dated 15/1/19 pursuant to Pt 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules on the ground that the order did not contain a statement of the right to make an application to set aside or vary the order
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Not the application the order, the Defendant seeks an order setting aside the "order" dated........Originally posted by lb1989 View PostReading 23.9 it states
With that in mind, I've got the following in my N244:
Doesn't quite sound right though?
Why? Because the application was made without notice seeking relief from sanctions, the Defendant was denied the right to make submissions as to why relief should not be granted thus contrary to the principles of natural justice, and the order was defective as it did not draw the Defendants attention to the fact that per CPR.... the defendant could apply to set the order aside.....
Something like that shoudl do the trickI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Could I argue that "proportionate cost" went out of the window when their application cost £255 on an original claim amount of £463, alongside the fact the order did not state I had the option to make an order to set aside under CPR 23.10Originally posted by Amethyst View PostJust for ref.
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Thank you! I can't quite get it all to fit in Q3 (what order). Can some of it shift into the evidence box in Q10.Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
Not the application the order, the Defendant seeks an order setting aside the "order" dated........
Why? Because the application was made without notice seeking relief from sanctions, the Defendant was denied the right to make submissions as to why relief should not be granted thus contrary to the principles of natural justice, and the order was defective as it did not draw the Defendants attention to the fact that per CPR.... the defendant could apply to set the order aside.....
Something like that shoudl do the trick
i.e.
The applicant seeks an order to set aside the order dated 18/1/19 pursuant to Pt 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules on the ground that the order was made without notice seeking relief from sanctions, as well as the evidence provided below.
Comment
-
you can put in the box 3, Why? Please see the reasons set out in section 10 of this applicationOriginally posted by lb1989 View Post
Thank you! I can't quite get it all to fit in Q3 (what order). Can some of it shift into the evidence box in Q10.
i.e.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
- 1 thank
Comment
-
Thanks for all your help so far. I've attached a draft copy of what I have so far. Do you think it needs a bit more meat to it? Also not sure how to start the evidence section, at the minute i've just put in the reasons. Do I need something like "I believe the order should be set aside based on the below evidence"? Maybe I could add something around the agreement stating repayment of £70 etc. (I have that in my original WS, could I re-submit that or even send an edited version?) as well as proportionate cost?
I'm off work today so just sat here trying to get it all typed up and make sure it has a leg to stand on!Attached Files
Comment
-
Aside from the N244, what else do I need to send?
do I have to do a draft order?
do I need to include my WS?
you mentioned earlier I’d have a good chance at getting the £100 for this application back - how would I go about that?
Want to get it all sent off on Monday as that is the last day I can send it to make it in time for the 7 days after receiving the original order.
Thanks
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.



Comment