Here's the Claimant's WS
** Lost ** Moriarty Law/MMF v lb1989
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Just putting your WS here for ease - https://legalbeagles.info/forums/fil...tch?id=1423917#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
Not a good witness statement to be fair.Originally posted by Amethyst View PostJust putting your WS here for ease - https://legalbeagles.info/forums/fil...tch?id=1423917
Its basically an admission of debt but the actual debt amount & interest is disputed.
Comment
-
Defence(although it was edited before submission) https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...14#post1399514#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
WTF that orders deficient in my view, CPR 23.10 gives a right to set it aside, yet the Court order makes no referencethe rights under CPR 23.9(3)
That order must be set asideI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
Comment
-
How would I go about that? I’ve read the below, but is there a fee involved?
23.10
(1) A person who was not served with a copy of the application notice before an order was made under rule 23.9, may apply to have the order set aside(GL) or varied.
(2) An application under this rule must be made within 7 days after the date on which the order was served on the person making the application.
- 1 thank
Comment
-
yes, you would need to make an application to the Court sadly, but i think its needed, you have gone from having a dead claim to a risk of CCJ in circumstances where the order facilitating it is frankly perverse.Originally posted by lb1989 View PostHow would I go about that? I’ve read the below, but is there a fee involved?
23.10
(1) A person who was not served with a copy of the application notice before an order was made under rule 23.9, may apply to have the order set aside(GL) or varied.
(2) An application under this rule must be made within 7 days after the date on which the order was served on the person making the application.
You could write to the Court making these observations but the chances are the judge will simply refuse without an applicationI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
Comment
-
Paul - can you have a quick look at that dodgy Mr Lender agreement too please - would it help the application to reiterate its deficient ( misstated total charge for credit etc) ?
£100 without notice app to set aside order ? or hearing reqd? Remembering we don't know what their app or evidence is based on and just assuming it's an administrative error plea. They were originally struck for not paying hearing fee.#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
Sorry to sound harsh here but £100 now, vs losing in court, having judgment and costs is in my book a no brainer. The Court has made an order on application of the claimant that it cannot really make, it must be set aside, and i think you wouold have a good shout at getting your costs back on the application too.Originally posted by lb1989 View PostSo what do you think I should do next? £100 seems a lot to try and set aside their application
That order needs to go, you ought to have your say as to why the Claim shouldnt be reinstated and your right to reply etcI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Argh i cannot seem to read the agreementOriginally posted by Amethyst View PostPaul - can you have a quick look at that dodgy Mr Lender agreement too please - would it help the application to reiterate its deficient ( misstated total charge for credit etc) ?
£100 without notice app to set aside order ? or hearing reqd? Remembering we don't know what their app or evidence is based on and just assuming it's an administrative error plea. They were originally struck for not paying hearing fee.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
Comment
-
#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
-
See if this helps xx MrLenderagreement.pdf#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.




Comment