• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Skeletal argument

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Skeletal argument

    Can someone.help me with the 3 things i habe to do for court its i dont know what to start with i have taken a picture to show what the court are asking for.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    You're the claimant ? ( just to check )
    Is the claim for over £10k or in fast track due to it's complexity ?
    (is this your claim against your Ex for your belongings still?)

    You need to exchange skeleton arguments with the other side and agree the bundle which will consist of the below.

    Originally posted by CPR
    3.2 Unless the court orders otherwise, the trial bundle should include a copy of:
    (1) the claim form and all statements of case,

    (2) a case summary and/or chronology where appropriate,

    (3) requests for further information and responses to the requests,

    (4) all witness statements to be relied on as evidence,

    (5) any witness summaries,

    (6) any notices of intention to rely on hearsay evidence under rule 32.2,

    (7) any notices of intention to rely on evidence (such as a plan, photograph etc.) under rule 33.6 which is not –
    (a) contained in a witness statement, affidavit or experts report,

    (b) being given orally at trial,

    (c) hearsay evidence under rule 33.2,


    (8) any medical reports and responses to them,

    (9) any experts’ reports and responses to them,

    (10) any order giving directions as to the conduct of the trial, and

    (11) any other necessary documents.


    3.3 The originals of the documents contained in the trial bundle, together with copies of any other court orders should be available at the trial.

    3.4 The preparation and production of the trial bundle, even where it is delegated to another person, is the responsibility of the legal representative5 who has conduct of the claim on behalf of the claimant.

    3.5 The trial bundle should be paginated (continuously) throughout, and indexed with a description of each document and the page number. Where the total number of pages is more than 100, numbered dividers should be placed at intervals between groups of documents.

    3.6 The bundle should normally be contained in a ring binder or lever arch file. Where more than one bundle is supplied, they should be clearly distinguishable, for example, by different colours or letters. If there are numerous bundles, a core bundle should be prepared containing the core documents essential to the proceedings, with references to the supplementary documents in the other bundles.

    3.7 For convenience, experts’ reports may be contained in a separate bundle and cross referenced in the main bundle.

    3.8 If a document to be included in the trial bundle is illegible, a typed copy should be included in the bundle next to it, suitably cross-referenced.


    3.9 The contents of the trial bundle should be agreed where possible. The parties should also agree where possible:
    (1) that the documents contained in the bundle are authentic even if not disclosed under Part 31, and

    (2) that documents in the bundle may be treated as evidence of the facts stated in them even if a notice under the Civil Evidence Act 1995 has not been served.

    Where it is not possible to agree the contents of the bundle, a summary of the points on which the parties are unable to agree should be included.

    3.10 The party filing the trial bundle should supply identical bundles to all the parties to the proceedings and for the use of the witnesses.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Good day it is against my ex for belongings. I did not ask for a notice of pictures but they were submitted in exchange of documents. I also am struggling with skeletal argument as trying to find case law concerning cpr 1977 interference woth goods act. As well as a case summary.
      i need some advise on this please if you can help.
      i was also trying ro find a precedent or case law of domestic abuse were the ex partner had redused to return personal items . Along with case law for false statement as he jad agreed to pay me half the house hold bills plus he took monies from me then said he would pay back.
      any pointers please?

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

      Announcement

      Collapse

      Support LegalBeagles


      Donate with PayPal button

      LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

      See more
      See less

      Court Claim ?

      Guides and Letters
      Loading...



      Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

      Find a Law Firm


      Working...
      X