Re: Any help gratefully received - Cabot and Rentons
Hi Nem,
Many thanks once again - I have now received a response from Restons - they state the following:
As we have confirmed on several occasions, a delay often occurs in the provision of documentation, as our client has to revert back to the Claimant, who in turn has to revert back to the original creditor.
We would however point out that proceedings were stayed on 8 December 2015 and have remained so.
We note your intention to apply to the court for the claim to be struck out. It is the Claimant's position that the making of this application will be unnecessary.
On this basis any application to strike out the claimant's claim will be defended and the costs associated sought from you.
What on earth does this mean? Why is the application unnecessary? The whole letter has confused me!!
Thanks in advance - this is really very much appreciated.
Anders.
Originally posted by nemesis45
View Post
Many thanks once again - I have now received a response from Restons - they state the following:
As we have confirmed on several occasions, a delay often occurs in the provision of documentation, as our client has to revert back to the Claimant, who in turn has to revert back to the original creditor.
We would however point out that proceedings were stayed on 8 December 2015 and have remained so.
We note your intention to apply to the court for the claim to be struck out. It is the Claimant's position that the making of this application will be unnecessary.
On this basis any application to strike out the claimant's claim will be defended and the costs associated sought from you.
What on earth does this mean? Why is the application unnecessary? The whole letter has confused me!!
Thanks in advance - this is really very much appreciated.
Anders.
Comment