• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lowell vs Reiss

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    @nemesis45 should i send you in private message? Or should i delete my personal details and upload?

    The address seems to be correct and so does the name (i.e spelling all fine)

    where it says Application Type: Internet Mar 2008

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Originally posted by Reiss View Post
    @nemesis45 @charitynjw i have just spoken to the court and they said the status is "stay".

    In regards to the Agreement there are no page numbers i have scanned exactly how the are (i.e nothing cropped out)

    I also have an additional two pages titled "Digital Signature Application Details" ??

    and the following pages are statements of transactions if thats of any help?
    Important Does your name and address appearas it was when the account was opened?
    Yes lets have a look at the rest Reiss.

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] [MENTION=5553]charitynjw[/MENTION] i have just spoken to the court and they said the status is "stay".

    In regards to the Agreement there are no page numbers i have scanned exactly how the are (i.e nothing cropped out)

    I also have an additional two pages titled "Digital Signature Application Details" ??

    and the following pages are statements of transactions if thats of any help?

    Leave a comment:


  • charitynjw
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Originally posted by Reiss View Post
    Hi @charitynjw i will give the court a ring now and let you all know what has been said, in regards to replying back to the defence what do you mean? I did post a letter i had received further up on this page #86
    Yep
    That's the court order instructing Lowells to make a reply to your submitted defence. ("....must contact the court.....")
    Have they done so?

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Originally posted by Reiss View Post
    @nemesis45 i have scanned all the pages for you to view https://www.scribd.com/document/332788631/Agreement
    let me know if you can view the link fine!!

    Many Thanks
    OK,

    Only one page C 3 of 8 ) are there numbers on any others?

    There is no signature page.

    Does this have your name and address as it was when the account was opened?

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Hi [MENTION=5553]charitynjw[/MENTION] i will give the court a ring now and let you all know what has been said, in regards to replying back to the defence what do you mean? I did post a letter i had received further up on this page #86

    Leave a comment:


  • charitynjw
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Also give the court a ring to check on the status of the claim, if you haven't already done so.
    Have they replied to your defence per the court order?

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] i have scanned all the pages for you to view https://www.scribd.com/document/332788631/Agreement
    let me know if you can view the link fine!!

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Originally posted by Reiss View Post
    Here is the letter below, also do i need to phone the court for anything? @charitynjw @Stu



    - - - Updated - - -

    Hi @nemesis45 yes i can scan now, is there any particular page as there are quite a few pages?
    Hello Reiss,

    The main page of the agreement please.

    I suggest that you check the terms and conditions are complete, e.g. are any terms/ conditions mentioned but not actually present, if the pages are numbered are they all there.

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Here is the letter below, also do i need to phone the court for anything? [MENTION=5553]charitynjw[/MENTION] [MENTION=69750]Stu[/MENTION]



    - - - Updated - - -

    Hi [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] yes i can scan now, is there any particular page as there are quite a few pages?

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Originally posted by Reiss View Post
    Hi All!!
    Hope everybody is well and wrapped up warm!!

    I have just got back from a mini break and shocked to see that a letter had come through the post, it contained the Original agreement and statement. It also states they still await a copy of the default notice.
    Hello Reiss,

    Can we see a copy of the agreement please?

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Hi All!!
    Hope everybody is well and wrapped up warm!!

    I have just got back from a mini break and shocked to see that a letter had come through the post, it contained the Original agreement and statement. It also states they still await a copy of the default notice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Reiss
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    Thank you [MENTION=69750]Stu[/MENTION] [MENTION=5553]charitynjw[/MENTION] for your replies, i will do just that and wait to see what happens.

    Fingers crossed it all goes to plan!!

    Leave a comment:


  • charitynjw
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    The court does not inform you of the stay.
    As [MENTION=69750]Stu[/MENTION] says, allow a couple of days or so over the 28 day deadline, then phone the court to check on the status of the claim.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stu
    replied
    Re: Lowell vs Reiss

    When their time is up leave it a few days more as apparently the courts are running well behind, they may tell you it is stayed but the solicitors might just get there in time and the courts not process their defence...
    Last edited by Stu; 16th November 2016, 10:46:AM. Reason: Spelling error

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X