Lowell vs Reiss

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Hi Everybody hope you are all well and good!! @nemesis45 @Diana M @MIKE770

Thank you for all the responses back in previous post and sorry it has taken me so long to get back on here, i've had a manic few months.

So 2 weeks ago i decided to call Northampton court as i had still not received the questionnaire and was getting worried.

After given the lady my details and claimant number she stated that it was "STAYED" i told her i had received a questionnaire from Lowell and there letter said i should be receiving one from yourselfs (northampton court) shortly. She said nothing had be processed and she even seemed confused herself, she then said she will send me by email and i should fill it out and return back.

So that is where i am at presently with this.....

Regards Reiss

Good morning Reiss,

I think Lowell has messed up again, and suddenly realised they have nothing to back up their claim!!

It would be best I think to check with the court on regular basis to avoid any dirty tricks from Lowell.

nem

[Reiss]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Hi Everybody hope you are all well and good!! [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] [MENTION=87380]Diana M[/MENTION] [MENTION=3599]MIKE770[/MENTION]

Thank you for all the responses back in previous post and sorry it has taken me so long to get back on here, i've had a manic few months.

So 2 weeks ago i decided to call Northampton court as i had still not received the questionnaire and was getting worried.

After given the lady my details and claimant number she stated that it was "STAYED" i told her i had received a questionnaire from Lowell and there letter said i should be receiving one from yourselfs (northampton court) shortly. She said nothing had be processed and she even seemed confused herself, she then said she will send me by email and i should fill it out and return back.

So that is where i am at presently with this.....

Regards Reiss

[Diana M]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

will do just that when i receive my copy!

When you receive your DQ from the court post on your thread to get comments on how you need to complete it.

A 'mirror image' of the Claimant's DQ responses may not be appropriate to your particular set of legal circumstances.

Di

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

they have indicated O on a few questionnaires it seems

Indeed so Mike !!

I don't think they have the qualified staff, can's see Ms de Tute toddling of round the county courts of England and Wales.


nem

[MIKE770]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Not necessarily.

Lowells have answered question D3 wrong unless they don't plan to show up for the hearing

The Defendant may want to 'do their own thing' such as have a handwriting expert or need a translator etc.

Or if the OP has a hospital appointment, job interview or a holiday booked in the next six months they need to put those dates in answer to Question D4 even though the Claimant has answered "No" to that availability question.

Di

they have indicated O on a few questionnaires it seems

[Diana M]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Not the first DQ by a long way where Lowell Solicitors rely on paperwork only and wont be the last.

Agreed, but the OP's answer on their own DQ shouldn't match the answer of Lowells if they (OP) plan to attend the hearing.

Reiss you should put "1" in answer to question D3 unless you want to tell the court that you won't be attending any hearing, which may mean they make a decision on paper without the benefit of your presence to support your written evidence.

Di

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Not necessarily.

Lowells have answered question D3 wrong unless they don't plan to show up for the hearing

The Defendant may want to 'do their own thing' such as have a handwriting expert or need a translator etc.

Or if the OP has a hospital appointment, job interview or a holiday booked in the next six months they need to put those dates in answer to Question D4 even though the Claimant has answered "No" to that availability question.

Di

Not the first DQ by a long way where Lowell Solicitors rely on paperwork only and wont be the last.

[Diana M]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Your answers when you receive your DQ should match theirs

Not necessarily.

Lowells have answered question D3 wrong unless they don't plan to show up for the hearing

The Defendant may want to 'do their own thing' such as have a handwriting expert or need a translator etc.

Or if the OP has a hospital appointment, job interview or a holiday booked in the next six months they need to put those dates in answer to Question D4 even though the Claimant has answered "No" to that availability question.

Di

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

@nemesis45 Thanks will do just that when i receive my copy.

Thanks for the rapid response back!!!

You're welcome Riess!!

Keep up to date on progress!

nem

[Reiss]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

[MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] Thanks will do just that when i receive my copy.

Thanks for the rapid response back!!!

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Happy New Year Reiss,!!

Your answers when you receive your DQ should match theirs I can see nothing contentious there.

Just follow the directions on the form.

nem

[Reiss]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Hi All and Happy New Year!! @nemesis45

I have today just received a letter from Lowel (please see scans below) Let me know your thoughts on this and what you would advise that i do from here on.

Kind Regards

Reiss

[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG][IMG][IMG][/IMG][/IMG]

[Reiss]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

[MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] thanks for the rapid replies back!!

i have uploaded the second page, the application was approved on 07/08/2008 (see below)

[Reiss]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

Below is the online application, there are two pages the other page has contact details, d.o.b and my employment details

[nemesis45]

Re: Lowell vs Reiss

@nemesis45 should i send you in private message? Or should i delete my personal details and upload?

The address seems to be correct and so does the name (i.e spelling all fine)

where it says Application Type: Internet Mar 2008

Ok ,

My question regarding the name and address was made as the pages I've seen seem generic and it could be a reconstituted agreement.

When was the account opened Reiss?

nem