Received following claim:
Defendant owes the claimant £650 under a regulated loan agreement eith V7 Limited V/A VIVUS dated **/**/ 2013 and which was assigned to the claimsnt on **/**/2014 and notice of which was givento the defendant on the **/**/14
Despite formal demands for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay and the claimant claims £650 and further claims interest thereon pursuant of section 69 of the county act limited to one tear court act 1984 limited to one year of 8% persnnum amounting to x amount.
So far:
i have acknowledged the claim, sent CCA and CPR
I have had no information sent back.
i have put in my defence.
i have also put in affordibility claim with “alleged” original lender which MMILE have replied stating Vivus do not exist any more but they carried out correct checks and it is deemed affordable?
Not sure what to reply as on one hand im contesting even knowing the loan and have asked for agreements then the affordibility claim Mm should have no right to reply saying they think vivus acted correctly?
Defendant owes the claimant £650 under a regulated loan agreement eith V7 Limited V/A VIVUS dated **/**/ 2013 and which was assigned to the claimsnt on **/**/2014 and notice of which was givento the defendant on the **/**/14
Despite formal demands for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay and the claimant claims £650 and further claims interest thereon pursuant of section 69 of the county act limited to one tear court act 1984 limited to one year of 8% persnnum amounting to x amount.
So far:
i have acknowledged the claim, sent CCA and CPR
I have had no information sent back.
i have put in my defence.
i have also put in affordibility claim with “alleged” original lender which MMILE have replied stating Vivus do not exist any more but they carried out correct checks and it is deemed affordable?
Not sure what to reply as on one hand im contesting even knowing the loan and have asked for agreements then the affordibility claim Mm should have no right to reply saying they think vivus acted correctly?
Comment