I cannot see how you can describe yourself as a ‘partnership’ and then be exempt from the partnership act? They answer each others emails, their business is so intertwined they are essentially one and the same.
In listing ARP as liable for costs, would you suggest the magistrates court has made an error? East SC are still listed as defendent on the court summary.
It seems churlish on the part of the council, seven months latter to argue what could essentially be called an administrative error?
also should an actual cost order have been produced or do you think that did happen?
In listing ARP as liable for costs, would you suggest the magistrates court has made an error? East SC are still listed as defendent on the court summary.
It seems churlish on the part of the council, seven months latter to argue what could essentially be called an administrative error?
also should an actual cost order have been produced or do you think that did happen?


Comment