Search
  • Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Directions Questionnaire N181

Collapse
Loading...
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous Next
  • #1

    Directions Questionnaire N181

    I have received a Directions Questionnaire N181 from the court regarding my claim against a barrister for professional negligence.
    Regarding part A Settlement. I have requested to settle the claim before the hearing but the defendant refused any type of ADR. Do I tick the yes box that I would like to settle the claim although I have attempted this and it has been refused.
    Regarding part C pre action protocols. I to the best of my knowledge have complied with the protocols, but the defendant has not. Do I tick the yes box and rely on defendant to be truthful in that they have not supplied evidence?
    Regarding D3. I do not understand this section at all. Most of my case is on paperwork although it has been done in a word processing application. Is this then electronic documentation? I have no idea which boxes to tick. Defendant has advised awaiting a case management hearing regarding disclosing documents.
    Regarding D4. What does this mean?
    Regarding E Experts. I have expert evidence that was used at the hearing. I wish to use this again. Do I tick the yes box or does it mean new expert evidence acquired since the hearing.
    Regarding J Directions. As I am a LIP will the defendants solicitor do this for me to agree or disagree?

    Think I posted in the wrong section previously so posting again!
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Originally posted by blondelady View Post
    I have received a Directions Questionnaire N181 from the court regarding my claim against a barrister for professional negligence.
    Regarding part A Settlement. I have requested to settle the claim before the hearing but the defendant refused any type of ADR. Do I tick the yes box that I would like to settle the claim although I have attempted this and it has been refused.
    Regarding part C pre action protocols. I to the best of my knowledge have complied with the protocols, but the defendant has not. Do I tick the yes box and rely on defendant to be truthful in that they have not supplied evidence?
    Regarding D3. I do not understand this section at all. Most of my case is on paperwork although it has been done in a word processing application. Is this then electronic documentation? I have no idea which boxes to tick. Defendant has advised awaiting a case management hearing regarding disclosing documents.
    Regarding D4. What does this mean?
    Regarding E Experts. I have expert evidence that was used at the hearing. I wish to use this again. Do I tick the yes box or does it mean new expert evidence acquired since the hearing.
    Regarding J Directions. As I am a LIP will the defendants solicitor do this for me to agree or disagree?

    Think I posted in the wrong section previously so posting again!
    I think you should always look to mediate, so settlement id say tick yes.

    On the Defendant not complying with the protocol, you must answer for you and you only, the defendant may say they have complied, then it is up to you to argue that they havent.

    The remaining questions are tricky to answer, are there any electronic docs? i dont know nor do i know if they are discloseable
    As for directions, you could try and invite the Defendnts lawyer to propose some draft directions or you could use the MOJ website here to create your own http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...ard-directions
    I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

    If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

    I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

    You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
    • 1 thank

    Comment

    • #3
      Thanks for your help, greatly appreciated.

      Comment

      Previous Next

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

      Announcement

      Collapse

      Support LegalBeagles


      Donate with PayPal button

      LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

      Create a Thread
      See more
      See less

      Court Claim ?

      Guides and Letters
      Loading...



      Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

      Find a Law Firm


      Working...
      X