Poorly formed defence - could this be thrown out by the court?

[cam69]

I have received a Defence which on the face of it does not appear to comply with the requirements of the CPR in that it does not address the claims that I have made.

This is a fast-track case started through MCOL.

Could someone take a look at this and give me an opinion?
I can post the claim and defence, of course (or PM them)

Thanks

[Amethyst]

I think to be able to help you'd have to post the claim particulars and defence - suitable redacted.

Has the case been allocated to track yet ?

[cam69]

Ok - thanks. I expected this. I will spend a bit of time to redact the documents.

[cam69]

Our case was recently allocated to the fast track

[cam69]

I have attached redacted copies of the Claim and Defence for further inspection

[cam69]

Can anyone offer an opinion on the way that the Defence has been written up here? Thanks in advance.