Good evening all,
I am looking for some assistance please. After my last experience with yourselves though this is by far the best place to get it.
I have recently been made aware PPI was part of my Credit Card I took out with Barclays in 2008. Now I have been made aware my complaint has been rejected on the basis that back in 2008 I have "ticked" a box and said I wanted PPI.
i have just came off the telephone with them and tried to have a conversation and make them aware that legitimately I had no clue I had PPI, it is unfortunate that my reason of complaint regardless of how true it is happens to be the same as most others too.
however I tried to make them aware as part of the online sale of the card I do not recollect at any point ticking this box etc and would like to see evidence of this which I was immediately hit with yes that's fine £10 please for the pleasure of a DSAR.
However am I right or wrong here that as part of a sale a bank or organisation cannot just presume a customer fully understands the policy and all it includes or even what PPI was (January 2008 I would have been 19, not a clue what PPI was) etc so they must provide written clarification of the policy and a policy document etc, making sure the customer is aware and understand the policy but also offering them a cooling off period? (Which I would have taken advantage of and cancelled as soon as I was made aware of any such policy).
I have never received any info, I was kindly told that the policy which was in my name (cancelled when I became of the policy a few weeks back) was intact an in house policy supplied and underwritten by Barclays themselves for ASU critical illness and life cover. None of this I needs as I have through my employer of whom I have worked since I was 16 on a full time permanent contract.
i would like to know if anyone feels I have an argument as I feel that I should have been provided info on the policy etc it even doesn't show on the credit card statements I receive.
unfortunately I fell behind on my payments and this doesn't help matters that the amount that I fell behind by each month was being increased due to a payment for something which I did not want or need not have any knowledge of its existence. Is this not also in the realms of consequential loss?
any help and assistance would be greatly appreciated.
thanks again for reading over my post
Cheers Dan
I am looking for some assistance please. After my last experience with yourselves though this is by far the best place to get it.
I have recently been made aware PPI was part of my Credit Card I took out with Barclays in 2008. Now I have been made aware my complaint has been rejected on the basis that back in 2008 I have "ticked" a box and said I wanted PPI.
i have just came off the telephone with them and tried to have a conversation and make them aware that legitimately I had no clue I had PPI, it is unfortunate that my reason of complaint regardless of how true it is happens to be the same as most others too.
however I tried to make them aware as part of the online sale of the card I do not recollect at any point ticking this box etc and would like to see evidence of this which I was immediately hit with yes that's fine £10 please for the pleasure of a DSAR.
However am I right or wrong here that as part of a sale a bank or organisation cannot just presume a customer fully understands the policy and all it includes or even what PPI was (January 2008 I would have been 19, not a clue what PPI was) etc so they must provide written clarification of the policy and a policy document etc, making sure the customer is aware and understand the policy but also offering them a cooling off period? (Which I would have taken advantage of and cancelled as soon as I was made aware of any such policy).
I have never received any info, I was kindly told that the policy which was in my name (cancelled when I became of the policy a few weeks back) was intact an in house policy supplied and underwritten by Barclays themselves for ASU critical illness and life cover. None of this I needs as I have through my employer of whom I have worked since I was 16 on a full time permanent contract.
i would like to know if anyone feels I have an argument as I feel that I should have been provided info on the policy etc it even doesn't show on the credit card statements I receive.
unfortunately I fell behind on my payments and this doesn't help matters that the amount that I fell behind by each month was being increased due to a payment for something which I did not want or need not have any knowledge of its existence. Is this not also in the realms of consequential loss?
any help and assistance would be greatly appreciated.
thanks again for reading over my post
Cheers Dan
Comment