Hi all.
I am currently in the process of trying to claim back a PPI refund from Britannia Building society which was a joint policy for myself and my wife covering redundancy, accident and sickness, which we took out in 1999 until 2005 with our mortgage. We cancelled the policy in 2005 when we realised how expensive it was and how much cheaper it was elsewhere.
I had a pre-existing medical condition (I have been asthmatic and on medication since at least 1980) at the time of taking out the policy. We were never informed that pre-existing medical conditions were excluded and would render the policy invalid. This was never discussed. As the policy was free for the first year, we were not really offered much information at all at the time of sale of the policy.
The only questions in the application questionnaire, with regard to medical history, that we had to answer when we filled in the application were:
Are you in good health, and
Have you visited a doctor in the last 12 months for anything other than minor conditions.
We both answered correctly 'NO' to both of these questions as we were in good health at the time and hadn't visited a doctor for anything other than minor conditions.
We have just been offered a full refund of all premiums plus interest from the Nationwide for the same issue (I sent pretty much identical letters to both Britannia and Nationwide as both policies were sold in the same manner, i.e free for the first year with very little information given).
I have just had to send a doctors letter to Nationwide confirming that I do suffer from asthma and have long periods of good health, proving I could have been in good health at the time of the application, and they will then process our refund.
Originally, the Britannia replied refusing a refund. I responded to this rejection letter by sending them the doctors letter that I sent to Nationwide and a copy of Nationwide's refund offer letter, as further evidence to back up my claim.
They have responded to this letter saying that they will refund the Illness part of my part of the policy only, if I send them a doctors letter listing all prescriptions and doctors appointments that I had during the duration of the policy (199-2005!!), to prove that I did have asthma and how bad it was.
As Britannia are now offering to pay back part of the policy premiums plus interest once I prove what they have asked, they are now in effect admitting the policy was mis-sold to myself and my wife.
My question, which I hope someone can answer is:
As the policy was a joint policy for myself and my wife, shouldn't they refund the entire policy payments plus interest, not just my illness portion of the premiums, if they are now admitting that the policy was mis-sold?
Surely, if a joint policy was mis-sold, it was mis-sold in its entirety, not just part of it?
If they had told me that the policy was not suitable for me due to my asthma, neither my wife or myself wouldn't have taken the policy with them. We would have looked at other options which were suitable for our needs.
I would be extremely grateful if somebody could offer me some advice.
I am quite willing to go to the Ombudsman, but would obviously like the best chance of success prior to doing that, and dont really want to wait 2 years to get my money back.
Thanks in advance.
I am currently in the process of trying to claim back a PPI refund from Britannia Building society which was a joint policy for myself and my wife covering redundancy, accident and sickness, which we took out in 1999 until 2005 with our mortgage. We cancelled the policy in 2005 when we realised how expensive it was and how much cheaper it was elsewhere.
I had a pre-existing medical condition (I have been asthmatic and on medication since at least 1980) at the time of taking out the policy. We were never informed that pre-existing medical conditions were excluded and would render the policy invalid. This was never discussed. As the policy was free for the first year, we were not really offered much information at all at the time of sale of the policy.
The only questions in the application questionnaire, with regard to medical history, that we had to answer when we filled in the application were:
Are you in good health, and
Have you visited a doctor in the last 12 months for anything other than minor conditions.
We both answered correctly 'NO' to both of these questions as we were in good health at the time and hadn't visited a doctor for anything other than minor conditions.
We have just been offered a full refund of all premiums plus interest from the Nationwide for the same issue (I sent pretty much identical letters to both Britannia and Nationwide as both policies were sold in the same manner, i.e free for the first year with very little information given).
I have just had to send a doctors letter to Nationwide confirming that I do suffer from asthma and have long periods of good health, proving I could have been in good health at the time of the application, and they will then process our refund.
Originally, the Britannia replied refusing a refund. I responded to this rejection letter by sending them the doctors letter that I sent to Nationwide and a copy of Nationwide's refund offer letter, as further evidence to back up my claim.
They have responded to this letter saying that they will refund the Illness part of my part of the policy only, if I send them a doctors letter listing all prescriptions and doctors appointments that I had during the duration of the policy (199-2005!!), to prove that I did have asthma and how bad it was.
As Britannia are now offering to pay back part of the policy premiums plus interest once I prove what they have asked, they are now in effect admitting the policy was mis-sold to myself and my wife.
My question, which I hope someone can answer is:
As the policy was a joint policy for myself and my wife, shouldn't they refund the entire policy payments plus interest, not just my illness portion of the premiums, if they are now admitting that the policy was mis-sold?
Surely, if a joint policy was mis-sold, it was mis-sold in its entirety, not just part of it?
If they had told me that the policy was not suitable for me due to my asthma, neither my wife or myself wouldn't have taken the policy with them. We would have looked at other options which were suitable for our needs.
I would be extremely grateful if somebody could offer me some advice.
I am quite willing to go to the Ombudsman, but would obviously like the best chance of success prior to doing that, and dont really want to wait 2 years to get my money back.
Thanks in advance.


Comment