PPI Judicial Review Judgment - BBA v FSA 20th April 2011

[Amethyst]

attached

Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWHC 999 (Admin)

Case No: CO/10619/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 20/04/2011

Before :

MR JUSTICE OUSELEY

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

THE QUEEN on the application of BRITISH BANKERS ASSOCIATION

Claimant

- and -

(1) THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY

(2) THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE

- and –

NEMO PERSONAL FINANCE LTD

Defendants

Interested Party

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Lord Pannick QC and Mr C Flint QC

Mr J Herberg and Mr S Pritchard (instructed byFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for the Claimant

Mr M Brindle QC and Miss M Carss-Frisk QC

Mr R Coleman and Mr J McClelland (instructed by SNR Denton UK LLP) for the First Defendant

Mr Hodge Malek QC and Mr J Strachan (instructed by Russell Cooke LLP) for the Second Defendant

Mr M Fordham QC and Mr P Luckhurst (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the Interested Party

Hearing dates: 25th, 26, 27th and 28th January 2011

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment




......

Overall conclusions
1. I grant permission to argue all three grounds, but dismiss them.

[Amethyst]

Re: PPI Judicial Review Judgment - BBA v FSA 20th April 2011

Also http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2011/999.html