Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

[cardinals]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Judge Waksman isn't among the judges nominated to sit on Administrative Court cases Information About - Administrative Court Administrative Court List

That is rather good news!

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

That is rather good news!

Lol.

Judge Waksman is a regional Mercantile Court judge and although technically also a deputy High Court judge, the Judicial Review Court Order specifically stated that this case is ''not suitable for hearing by a Deputy High Court judge''. I believe that Administrative Court judges are senior High Court judges.

The judge who issued the PPI Court Order - below - and refused the FOS's request to throw out the claim against them for being out of time is Justice MaKenna, who isn't apparently totally unknown to controversy Is McKENNA HHJ OUT OF HIS DEPTH?

My view of senior judges used to be quite cynical until I sat through the bank charges test case hearings and I was genuinely taken aback with how intelligent and able they are to grasp and absorb large amounts of really complex stuff. Especially Justice Smith in the first instance test case who had to deal separately with the minutia of 8 different defences. He was stunningly bright.

Although Judicial Reviews are normally heard by a single judge it's not inconceivable the case could be heard by 2 judges - at least that's what I'm told. If it goes on to the Court of Appeal it'll be 3 judges and 5 if it makes it to the Supreme Court.

[Chip Tuesday]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

so does McKenna not sit at Administrative level (usually) as he is not included on the Admin court list of nominated judges?

CT

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

so does McKenna not sit at Administrative level (usually) as he is not included on the Admin court list of nominated judges?

CT

I don't know. He's listed here as a Circuit Judge so maybe he just vets JR applications Judiciary of England and Wales | List of members of the judiciary | Circuit Judges

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Top 20 cases of 2011 - BBA v FSA & FOS at #7 Top 20 cases of 2011 | Features | The Lawyer

One of the FSA's counsel, Richard Coleman, was junior counsel for the OFT in the bank charges test case.

[Amethyst]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Oooo and the Harry Potter case has made the top 20 too.

6 Paul Gregory Allen v (1) Bloomsbury Publishing plc; (2) Joanne Kathleen Murray (aka JK Rowling)
Allegation that the fourth book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, infringes copyright in the claimant’s work Willy the Wizard.




Jolly exciting (and irrelevant to this thread sorry)

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Oooo and the Harry Potter case has made the top 20 too.

6 Paul Gregory Allen v (1) Bloomsbury Publishing plc; (2) Joanne Kathleen Murray (aka JK Rowling)
Allegation that the fourth book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, infringes copyright in the claimant’s work Willy the Wizard.




Jolly exciting (and irrelevant to this thread sorry)

You can just imagine it can't you?

Judge: ''Willy the who?''

Counsel for Willy the Wizard: ''Willy the Wizard, m'lud.''


Anyway, quite an interesting article on the JR, albeit written prior to the defendants responses http://www.dac.co.uk/documents/resou..._review_-_Wire

[Chip Tuesday]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

There have been so many cases brought against JK Rowling, including one including a book about a young witch with a magic double bass who has a cousin named Harry...!

CT

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Leaked letter reveals banks' dirty tricks on PPI reclaiming

[Chip Tuesday]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Leaked letter reveals banks' dirty tricks on PPI reclaiming

The Scoundrels, just goes to show our sceticism is well founded.

CT

[The Debt Star]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

"The arbitrator receives around 2,500 PPI claims a week and upholds roughly eight out of ten."

There you go. Keep at 'em.

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

The Scoundrels, just goes to show our sceticism is well founded.

CT

I love this from the HSBC spokesman:

"Our processing of PPI complaints is in line with BBA guidance for members waiting for resolution to the judicial review.''

So, that's alright then.

[Amethyst]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Leaked letter reveals banks' dirty tricks on PPI reclaiming

So where's the actual letter?

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

So where's the actual letter?

Maybe MSE are uncomfortable with publishing it.

[Amethyst]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Maybe. I just prefer first hand than someone elses take on things. There aren't any direct quotes from the letter published either are there? Assuminig it related to an individual case there would be DPA issues, but a good amount of redaction of the personal bits should make it okay to publish and I expect the letters are templated with personal bits added after anyways.

(don't mind me, I'm just sulking)