Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

[di30]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Di, I think it was a misread, ie that the JR finished 28th January and that they rang in February. Note that there is a full stop after 28th . It's a grammatical error on their part.

I would add that the subsequent part of the post states about having guidelines to deal with PPI which means that clearly it wasn't over and completed since they would have said what guidelines that they were talking about.

Oh yes I see now, lol trust me to miss that.

[leclerc]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Wherever I go there seems to be that letters have been received from the FOS that it could take a year yet!

However, was just catching up over at MSE etc, and someone had posted up that they are dealing with Natwest, and they were told the JR issue had finished on the 28 Feb and that the banks lost, but surely we would have heard something by now, wrong info given to the person I expect.

Post number: 928


http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/...786416&page=47

Di, I think it was a misread, ie that the JR finished 28th January and that they rang in February. Note that there is a full stop after 28th . It's a grammatical error on their part.

I would add that the subsequent part of the post states about having guidelines to deal with PPI which means that clearly it wasn't over and completed since they would have said what guidelines that they were talking about.

[cappo]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Corrected as we do not want everyone getting there hopes up.

Regards

i know it might be totally the wrong idea but couid no news be good news,so the old pun goes

[leclerc]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

haven,t heard anything yet guys and are trawling all the sites to try to find out some info, tried to get onto a government website yesterday re duncan ouesleys decision about the j.r and got a little bit which suggested that he,d claimed the j.r was "unargueable" but i cannot confirm that.

Try the word Judicial Review, Fawcett Society cos that judgement was about the government budget and women

EDIT: Gender-Equity Group Cant Challenge U.K. Budget, Judge Rules - Businessweek

[cappo]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Hopefully the poster will get back and let us know since you posted PF, cheers.
And seems like he or she may have just been misleaded perhaps with the wrong info?
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------



Totally agree.

haven,t heard anything yet guys and are trawling all the sites to try to find out some info, tried to get onto a government website yesterday re duncan ouesleys decision about the j.r and got a little bit which suggested that he,d claimed the j.r was "unargueable" but i cannot confirm that.

[di30]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Hopefully the poster will get back and let us know since you posted PF, cheers.
And seems like he or she may have just been misleaded perhaps with the wrong info?
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------

Corrected as we do not want everyone getting there hopes up.

Regards

Totally agree.

[pompeyfaith]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Corrected as we do not want everyone getting there hopes up.

Regards

[di30]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

However we do know from the media that if the banks lose then yes they would have to possibly pay out to 3 odd million customers, but not came across anything as yet about the verdict, which we again know can take some time.

[di30]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Wherever I go there seems to be that letters have been received from the FOS that it could take a year yet!

However, was just catching up over at MSE etc, and someone had posted up that they are dealing with Natwest, and they were told the JR issue had finished on the 28 Feb and that the banks lost, but surely we would have heard something by now, wrong info given to the person I expect.

Post number: 928


http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/...786416&page=47

[pompeyfaith]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Years ago a lot of us where either paid in cash or paid weekly into a bank account and each bank had a bank manager so issues were sorted at local level.

Internet was also not such a big deal then so word never spread as much as it does now indeed the internet has empowered the british citizen and business is or should understand that it can no longer get away with ripping off the british citizen as they will see a big dent in there profits.

Business should be working in tune with the british citizen not against it.

[cappo]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Probably already posted up, and this is about a fortnight old.

http://news.scotsman.com/news/Lloyds...for.6726208.jp

Lloyds and RBS worst for serving the public who bailed them out.

A SHARP rise in the number of complaints about Britain's banks was reported in the second half of last year, with taxpayer-backed RBS and Lloyds Banking Group named the biggest culprits.
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) yesterday reported a 15 per cent increase in the number of complaints about financial services firms in the final six months of 2010.

More to follow on link posted above.........

i think it,s all about making a huge profit now di,i don,t think they care that the taxpayer bailed them out, you never used to hear so much of this poor treatment years ago did you i don,t know if it did,nt happen or was swept under the carpet.

[di30]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Probably already posted up, and this is about a fortnight old.

http://news.scotsman.com/news/Lloyds...for.6726208.jp

Lloyds and RBS worst for serving the public who bailed them out.

A SHARP rise in the number of complaints about Britain's banks was reported in the second half of last year, with taxpayer-backed RBS and Lloyds Banking Group named the biggest culprits.
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) yesterday reported a 15 per cent increase in the number of complaints about financial services firms in the final six months of 2010.

More to follow on link posted above.........

[cappo]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

I got three letters from the FOS yesterday,re three seperate complaints, informing of delays in complaint handling due to the BBA action and advising that it could take in excess of a year for some cases to be resolved......I have a number of complaints with them so Im expecting more copies of the same letter anytime soon.

now found out fos are putting me on fast track due to i,ll health as there so busy i still think it,ll be a while though.

[MattyA]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

It's disappointing that the FOS felt concerned enough to write to Claims Management Companies about the delays but not individual claimants.

I got three letters from the FOS yesterday,re three seperate complaints, informing of delays in complaint handling due to the BBA action and advising that it could take in excess of a year for some cases to be resolved......I have a number of complaints with them so Im expecting more copies of the same letter anytime soon.

[EXC]

Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold

Reading the above you'd be forgiven for thinking that Nicola Northway and Barclays had actually been successful in appealing the Competition Commission's PPI point-of-sale-ban.

''The judgment was handed down in October 2009 and Barclays became only the second company to successfully appeal commission recommendations at the Competition Appeal Tribunal......

Barclays' case was based on the notion that the CC failed to account for the ''inconvenience'' that consumers would endure by not being able to buy PPI at the point-of-sale.

But the ''success'' only meant that the CC had to reconsider this aspect of their decision, which they did and came to precisely the same conclusion.

Payment protection insurance: Point-of-sale ban will go ahead | Money | The Guardian

So far from being ''successful'', the appeal was an unmitigated and expensive failure.