Cartel using Burleys solicitors ? NOT ANY MORE :-D

[righty]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

Ame have PM'd you regarding repos

[Amethyst]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

We had a small communication with him. Mainly on the basis that he had said he ran a CMC.

He responded with some info about himself and his campaign and the company he works with. He basically assists victims of sub prime mortgage lenders who are fighting reposession use the CCA regulations.

I'll ask if we can say any further - your thought Righty was exactly my first thought - hmmm trying to get rid of the competition, but hearing more of what he had to say I don't think that is the case.

[righty]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

In the Lib Dems website blurb he admits to running some sort of CMC. In fact I think there's a link in there. So what he says needs to be taken with a large pinch of salt

[Amethyst]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

I think you have it pretty spot on re CCLS and the Lib Dem guy - doesnt sound like his issue is with the solicitors but the introducer company.

I did start a thread about the solicitors who actually take on and handle these cases properly and professionally, but its very difficult because we cant recommend any without direct experience, and the only people I have any knowledge or experience with is Stephensons.

Theres a number of the big boys specialising in cca cases. If you do decide to use any and can be impartial we would be very interested to hear back your experiences. "Publicised" cases such as the SPML and the recent BOS case are rather few and far between which doesnt meet the expectations raised from the dubious 95% claims made by the CMCs who want your £199 to £495 up front fee.

Across the forums we dont see people coming back from having used these CMCs with good experiences barring very obvious spammers (ie no evidence , very little detail and no undertsanding of the cca )and it would be nice to see more. if they exist which they must.

[Pouring Rain]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

Very interesting, I didn't see this thread before.

I've been on the prowl to find a decent no win, no fee lawyer, just because I don't want to end up being taken to court by the creditors and then find I have to fork out a lot of money for a barrister. I went with what PT has said in other posts, that you don't need to go for CMCs that will charge money upfront.

Well my hunt turned up Consumer Credit Litigation Solicitors ... and also Stephensons, and I see you guys already knew about them both! I had to ring Bradley Say's Chambers to get their recommendations for good solicitors firms that they would work with ... and those are two names that they suggested.

So now I'm wondering what this Lib Dem candidate has against CCLS. If Bradley Say's office say they are good, then it makes me wonder if there's a more complex story here

Maybe these people filter out the best cases and that's what Bradley Say sees, and then keep the rest in some kind of limbo?? But I am surprised that the Lib Dem candidate thinks people have put money up front. According to Burley's website they don't charge an upfront fee...and as Curleyben and Righty have noted, CCLS and Burleys are the same firm. Very difficult to get through to CCLS on the phone if you haven't already got a case number from them though!

[righty]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

Someone from the LibDems (I think it's the local MP) posted their email address on CAG asking that anyone who was having problems with Cartel should contact them only to have their email removed by freaky leaky because of the 'site rules' ...........unbelievable
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
And this is the guy's post It appears he's the LibDem candidate

Anyone suffering with issues and problems with Cartel, such as delays, lack of
responses ect please let me know. Visit www.stokenorthlibdems.com
(http://www.stokenorthlibdems.com)
email me direct on davidjack@stokenorthlibde ms.com (davidjack@stokenorthlibdems.com)

AND he names us & CAG on his site as good sources of information on reclaiming charges

[righty]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

CONSUMER CREDIT LITIGATION SOLICITORS
Floor 5, Building 5,
Universal Square,
Devonshire Street,
Manchester,
M12 6JH
Tel: 0845 026 2599
Fax: 0845 675 2605
Partners: Richard J. Burley and Karl A. Berry.
483311

BURLEY, RICHARD JAMES - Senior Partner
ID: 293295
Admission Date: 01/03/2004
Higher Rights of Audience: No
Registered Foreign Lawyer: No
Registered European Lawyer: No
Insolvency Practitioner: No
Address:
BURLEYS SOLICITORS
64 Balderton Gate
NEWARK
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
NG24 1UN
ENGLAND
Telephone Number:0845 009 5354
Areas of law:
Children law
Civil litigation
Consumer problems
Employment law
Family law
Personal injury

Details: ]BERRY, KARL ANDREW - Partner
ID: 260197 Admission Date: 17/09/2001 Higher Rights of Audience: No
Registered Foreign Lawyer: No
Registered European Lawyer: No

Address: BURLEYS SOLICITORS
Building 5 Universal Square
Devonshire Street North
MANCHESTER
LANCASHIRE
M12 6JH
ENGLAND
Areas of law: Consumer problems

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

Cartel Client Review Consumer Credit Litigation SOlicitors

please email: davidjack@stokenorthlibdems.com

[Amethyst]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

pmsl ohh they same people.


Theres rumours in last couple weeks going about of impending bankruptcy (which I don't believe yet) and that the MOJ are investigating heavily (which i don't think the MOJ would tell anyone until something was signed and sealed) so although i don't particularly like Cartel, I would hazard a guess these are rumours from competitors.


anyway - Burleys will look at agreement without a charge, as will Stephensons - so really don't know why people feel the need to stump up hundreds to get their agreements 'evaluated'.

[Curlyben]

Re: Cartel using Burleys solicitors ?

CCLS: Contact Us | Consumer Credit Litigation Solicitors

Try this: http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosin...1&searchType=L

Notice any matches ??