Letter from HSBC Solicitors

[Smasher]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

Haha, well, lets hope so!

In the very least, as long as we can produce something decent to persuade the court that we need this data in order to amend our POCs there's a chance they could grant us 40 days for the SAR + maybe a further 30 days to analyse and use the data.
We should no doubt expect bankers to mess us around in supplying ALL DATA, but this time, that should only serve to shoot themselves in the foot because, assuming the stay was granted on these grounds, we can just inform the courts that we'll need to extend the stay because Mr Banker is dragging his feet and breaching DPA regs.

If we got to pay the fee for the N244 anyway, then that extra tenner should be well worth it.

[stephen1976]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

HOW DAM RUDE !!!

We never had are heads in the sand Penalty charges was the first site to have new templates up these were posted on MSE as well, but then again I did not know it was a competition.

[EXC]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

I'm sorry Stephen, I do indeed know that and it really wasn't aimed at your site.

[EXC]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

This letter is post OFT announcement and invites the court to dismiss the case.

[EXC]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors



Re: Not over yet! RGS1 vs HSBC





Re: Not over yet! RGS1 vs HSBC

[Amethyst]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

He amended his particulars to include penalties and level of charges ? eh what?

[EXC]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

I'm not clear whether the claimant responded to DG's standard letter saying he was going to use amended arguments rather than actually submitting an amended POC. All we've got to go on is:

''I sent a letter requesting to change my POC's and DG responded to this letter, as far as i know i havent actually changed them yet though so do people think it is ok to amend them further before it is formally submitted??''

''Yes I originally sent that one then expanded section 5 in my POC's and sent that off.
Their responce arguement to this was to do with the price of the charges so I want to amend it to remove the price arguement.
I dont have the letter with me at work today but ill post it when I can.
Just a bit worried about them saying they would apply for me to pay their costs.''

Either way he was taken in by the uncorrected myth that non individually negotiated contracts are grounds for unfairness in themselves.

I hope someone can ask him to post up the letter or POC that the DG letter was in response to.

[TUTTSI]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

I did ask him this morning as I read that as well. very worrying that he has jumped in without giving to much thought perhaps.

Tutts[

quote=EXC;147996]I'm not clear whether the claimant responded to DG's standard letter saying he was going to use amended arguments rather than actually submitting an amended POC. All we've got to go on is:

''I sent a letter requesting to change my POC's and DG responded to this letter, as far as i know i havent actually changed them yet though so do people think it is ok to amend them further before it is formally submitted??''

''Yes I originally sent that one then expanded section 5 in my POC's and sent that off.
Their responce arguement to this was to do with the price of the charges so I want to amend it to remove the price arguement.
I dont have the letter with me at work today but ill post it when I can.
Just a bit worried about them saying they would apply for me to pay their costs.''

Either way he was taken in by the uncorrected myth that non individually negotiated contracts are grounds for unfairness in themselves.

I hope someone can ask him to post up the letter or POC that the DG letter was in response to.[/quote]

[Amethyst]

Re: Letter from HSBC Solicitors

he's replied - thankfully he hasnt entered the POCs in court. incredibly focused on individual negotiated terms and price. Not over yet! RGS1 vs HSBC - Page 3 - The Consumer Forums