• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Ladidi v Abbey - settlement offer ** SETTLED**

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    halifax, lloyds and abbey....seem to be getting offers sent out.

    lol 'sok took me a while to work out what you meant
    Last edited by Amethyst; 23rd July 2008, 18:41:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ladidi
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    OMG I cant believe I misread that date...Lol

    I`m a right dizzy dodo at times lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    ummmm whats on the 27th ? (sorry if I'm being exceedingly dense)






    ahhhhhhh the waiver terms.....well I think those bits were in the original waiver too - will double check tho

    hehe lol here

    If the firm attempts to resolve a relevant charges complaint after 27 July 2007:
    anyway original from th new waiver terms:-

    (16)
    if the firm attempts to resolve a relevant charges complaint after 27 July 2007:
    The Financial Services Authority
    25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS, United Kingdom
    Telephone +44 (0)20 7066 1000 Fax +44 (0)20 7066 1099
    Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered office as above
    - 6 -
    (a)
    the firm must not seek agreement from the complainant that the resolution is in full and final settlement of the matter;
    (b)
    in relation to such complaints, if the outcome of the test case produces a result that is more favourable to the complainant, the firm must take all reasonable steps to pay any difference in the amount of compensation actually received by the complainant and that that the complainant would have been entitled if his claim has not been settled by the firm then; and
    (c)
    the firm must explain the implications of its approach and commitment;
    (17)
    upon resolution of the test case, the firm must apply relevant principles established through such resolution in handling relevant charges complaints under DISP (even if the firm is not a party to the test case);
    (18)
    the firm must not close accounts or threaten closure of accounts of customers when it might reasonably appear that this is for the purpose (or with the intent) of penalising customers that have complained about unauthorised overdraft charges for having complained, or deterring future complaints from these customers or others. For the avoidance of doubt, the firm may close accounts or threaten to close accounts where there is good justification for doing so based on the circumstances of the particular case;
    Last edited by Amethyst; 23rd July 2008, 18:31:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ladidi
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    Cheers Budgie,

    now your going to think I am being a cheeky burger. I have no idea how to word that so that it comes across as me protecting myself and also so that I do not lose out.

    Secondly, does this mean if I have to get this sorted before the 27th July or can I make them wait until after teh 27th then they could not make this an offer as a full and final settlement? Do you know what I mean, half the time I dont think even I know what I am saying lol..

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    Thats really good news Ladidi.

    I think accepting isn't a problem on part payments now using the terms of the waiver....when the case is over in our favour ( ) you can get the rest.

    I would guess they will try attaching conditions to the offer - without liability, confidentiallity, full and final etc. Just stick your ground (unless you are really desperate for the money of course )

    Wonder if this is a sign of things to come...reply to their offer in writing if you can - its no matter what their current charges are - the originals were unlawful (in our opinion) so they must repay ALL of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Budgie
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    Thanks Ladidi,

    OK you can try and push for a bit more.

    There is no real legal term to use for this it's just a question of perhaps saying that you have discussed it with your OH and would be prepared to accept a partial, gesture of goodwill payment, at this stage, of say 75% or 80% etc.

    HOWEVER :

    Note that according to the terms of the waiver :-

    (16)
    if the firm attempts to resolve a relevant charges complaint after 27 July 2007:
    The Financial Services Authority
    (a) the firm must not seek agreement from the complainant that the resolution is in full and final settlement of the matter;
    (b) in relation to such complaints, if the outcome of the test case produces a result that is more favourable to the complainant, the firm must take all reasonable steps to pay any difference in the amount of compensation actually received by the complainant and that that the complainant would have been entitled if his claim has not been settled by the firm then; and
    (c) the firm must explain the implications of its approach and commitment;


    So make it quite clear to Abbey that you would only consider this as a payment on account, not in final settlement of your claim.

    You can also say that according to the terms of the waiver :-

    (15)
    to the extent that sums are ultimately to be paid to complainants in respect of relevant charges complaints that have been stayed, the firm must include in these sums an element of compensation in respect of interest charged to or lost by the customer as a result of being out of money during the stay period;


    Hope that helps !

    Regards Budgie

    Leave a comment:


  • Ladidi
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    Hi Budgie,

    My claim is with Abbey, My total is £5362.13 and thats broken down at £4442.47 charges for last 6 years and interest. total interest plus charges on date 18/06/07 5362.13 which is the amount abbey are using to settle or rather part settle..No court fees as I was exempt from this at time of claim
    ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
    I have just worked out that "if" the banks come to some agreement with what Barclays are saying is £8 per charge yeah and take the total claims I have for each of their transactions they have charged me that this comes to £1126.00. So if I was to look at their 70% offer and push for the interest due from date of claim to settlement I would receive £4053.76 but if the banks get ana greement on the say for arguments sake £8 which is what Barclays are pertaining to be a fair amount I would receive £4146.13 plus interest £331.69 totalling £4480.82
    I believe they shouldd offer/pay more they have benfit of my/our money for a long time and we should get back what we are due.

    What do you guys and gals think?
    Last edited by Ladidi; 23rd July 2008, 18:09:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Leave a comment:


  • Budgie
    replied
    Re: Banks granted unfair charges waiver

    Hi Ladidi,

    Very interesting !

    Who is your claim with?

    What is the breakdown of your claim, ie Charges, interest, court fees etc?

    Rgds Budgie

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X