Tweet
Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors
Yet "Hamptons Legal" and "Red" are, once more, sending out threatograms that suggest they might sue.
Unless they have somehow cobbled together a reconstituted "twue copy" of a document that probably never existed, they'd still come up against the same problem.
Someone should cauterise them.
Originally posted by Celestine, on 1[SUP
st[/SUP] August;362176]I do think sometimes a 'watchful eye' is all thats needed, I wasn't even instructed on Smiths case, just got authority from him and let Howard Cohen know I was 'monitoring' events. They knew that if they put one foot wrong, I would go under instruction and hit them hard for costs.
They tried two days ago to say that they were going to further extend the CPR 31.14 deadline. I merely asked when they would recognise that their delays had become an abuse of process. 24 hrs later they called back to say they had decided to withdraw the claim 'due to the vulnerability' of the defendant.
Of course.........nothing to do with the fact that their claim was deeply flawed and lacking any evidence
They tried two days ago to say that they were going to further extend the CPR 31.14 deadline. I merely asked when they would recognise that their delays had become an abuse of process. 24 hrs later they called back to say they had decided to withdraw the claim 'due to the vulnerability' of the defendant.
Of course.........nothing to do with the fact that their claim was deeply flawed and lacking any evidence
Unless they have somehow cobbled together a reconstituted "twue copy" of a document that probably never existed, they'd still come up against the same problem.
Someone should cauterise them.
Comment