• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

    hi Celestine not had any paper work from howard cohen & co solictors


    just wondering if they have sent you the paper work ?


    as its been well over 30 day

    with cpr letter
    none compliance

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

      Hi there

      The deadline for CPR 31.14 expired on 6th July. So as nothing has been received, they have not complied.

      Sorry for the delay from me, been hectic LOL.

      Ive emailed them now to ask why they've not yet withdrawn the claim. I'll update when I hear more.
      "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

      I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

      If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

      If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

        Claim Withdrawn

        Congratulations Smith eace:
        "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

        I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

        If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

        If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

          Originally posted by Celestine View Post
          Claim Withdrawn

          Congratulations Smith eace:
          BRILLIANT! :high5: :high5: :high5:

          Cel strikes yet again! :cheer2: :cheer2: :cheer2:
          ...and it HAD to be the Leeds Losers, her name must strike fear into every monkey at Lowlife HQ.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

            Originally posted by Celestine View Post
            Claim Withdrawn

            Congratulations Smith eace:


            thank you ever so much Celestine i owe you 1 big bunch of flowers
            as thanks for your help couldn't have done it with out you and your a star xx

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

              Originally posted by Celestine View Post
              Claim Withdrawn Congratulations Smith eace:
              Congratulations on yet another victory Cel :high5: You've got a 100% success rate so far :whoo:


              All the more enjoyable since you scored a victory against Howard Cohen solicitors who lost my Santander vs. Mayhew case msl:

              I love seeing them crushed more than any other law firm :bounce:

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                I do think sometimes a 'watchful eye' is all thats needed, I wasn't even instructed on Smiths case, just got authority from him and let Howard Cohen know I was 'monitoring' events. They knew that if they put one foot wrong, I would go under instruction and hit them hard for costs.

                They tried two days ago to say that they were going to further extend the CPR 31.14 deadline. I merely asked when they would recognise that their delays had become an abuse of process. 24 hrs later they called back to say they had decided to withdraw the claim 'due to the vulnerability' of the defendant.
                Of course.........nothing to do with the fact that their claim was deeply flawed and lacking any evidence
                "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                  CASE CLOSED FOR NOW
                  take notice that the claimant hereby discontinues all
                  proceedings under the above numberd action and accordingly withdraws
                  from the same
                  we certify that a copy of this notice has been served on the defendant


                  second letter

                  we can confirm that we have been instructed by our client to discontinue the county court claim issued
                  against you therefore please find enclosed by way of service you notice of discontinuance
                  we trust this is in order

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                    the above account letter from lowell dated 7,oct 2013

                    we regret to notice that dispite previous correspondence regarding your account we have not received payment or a valid reason for non payment
                    failure to respond to this notice may result in further action being taken please call

                    ps
                    this case was droped that cel sorted out 3 to 4 phone calls a day and evening and the jokers are still asking for solictors and court fees lol

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                      Originally posted by celestine View Post
                      24 hrs later they called back to say they had decided to withdraw the claim 'due to the vulnerability' of the defendant.
                      Originally posted by smith View Post
                      the above account letter from lowell dated 7,oct 2013

                      we regret to notice that dispite previous correspondence regarding your account we have not received payment or a valid reason for non payment
                      failure to respond to this notice may result in further action being taken please call

                      ps
                      this case was dropped that cel sorted out 3 to 4 phone calls a day and evening and the jokers are still asking for solicitor's and court fees
                      One might wonder when (or if) the Leeds Losers will again consider "the vulnerability of the defendant" and begin to understand that they might become liable for damages arising from harassment.

                      Their antics are not (yet) sufficiently oppressive to merit such action, but would they refrain from becoming an unholy nuisance merely from decency?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                        Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                        One might wonder when (or if) the Leeds Losers will again consider "the vulnerability of the defendant" and begin to understand that they might become liable for damages arising from harassment.

                        Their antics are not (yet) sufficiently oppressive to merit such action, but would they refrain from becoming an unholy nuisance merely from decency?
                        They have pretty much sunk themselves with their own letters. As a famous person accross the way used to say Hung by their own Petard

                        What a wunch of Bankers

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                          there solicitors above told celestine no costs would be added to the debt
                          but yet they have

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                            Doubtless Celestine will remind them of that

                            The are complete idiots

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                              Originally posted by ODC View Post
                              They are complete idiots
                              Why are you sure they are complete?

                              For all you know, they may have some bits missing.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: smith v the lowell group & howard cohen & co solictors

                                14 oct 2013
                                despite the fact we have offerd you numerous opportunities to reslove the debt it remains out standing

                                unless we receive payment in full or part payment with proposed payment plaN
                                within the next 5 days we will have no alternative but to instruct our solicitor to
                                look to begin legal action against you this could result in us applying for the value
                                of the to be secured on your property or applying to recover the money you owe by making deductions directly from your earnings along with court costs and interest alternatively we may arrange for an agent to vist your adress to negotiate settlement
                                you can still avoid further action being taken by contacting our collections department now

                                advise please 14
                                celestine


                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X